There is no such thing as a "muslim mentality" - the represent people from hundreds of cultures some completely different. The people being attacked no more deserve than any other people yet essentially get blamed for being attacked simply because they are Muslim and are some how asking for it. That is bigotry plain and simple and it's bigotry in UK just as it's bigotry in Egypt when the Copts were attacked.
Hard to believe? I think I have slightly more experience than you do with Muslims and Arabs in general, I recommend you watch the video where David Wood explains the origins and the references in the Qura'n, the most studied Muslim-only book which is the source for the differences.
There is a mentality for everything now you must have missed a discussion we had here about Tribalism and why the M.E. is burning, or perhaps the documentary I posted here on this thread by Zvi Yehezkeli, open your mind and watch - later judge and conclude, its not wise to conclude before judging or to judge before knowing.
I think your experiences are limited to Muslim Arabs and your perceptions are influenced by your personal veiwpoint and experiences. I'm not denying their validity, I'm just saying they are colored by your own views. Let me put it this way: Palestinians who have plenty of experience with Jews and Israeli Jews in particular have some pretty negative things to say about Israeli's and Jews in general. Are they accurate?
When you talk about tribalism etc. in Arab culture - I agree with you. If you talk about a need for a reformation in a religion that is still stuck in a Medievil mindset in many parts of the world and which the other major world religion, Christianity, has moved beyond - I agree.
I did not find David Wood convincing at all, so I went and looked him up:
David Wood Christian apologist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Christian apologetics - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
The American Muslim TAM
Exposing David Wood Of Mosques and Men Pt. 2 loonwatch.com
Rebuttal to David Wood s Article Muhammad in the Bible An Analysis of the Muslim Appeal to Biblical Prophecy
If I want to learn about Islam, I would do the following: read a decent history of Mohammed that included the cultures of the era, read a history of it's spread and it's different sects, written by reputable historians, read some works by modern Islamic writers and scholars (not self-professed experts), read the Quran and interpretations/explanations of what it means both today and in the context of the times, and read some works on Islam in the the modern world and on Islamic culture. I would read books by Muslims themselves on what constitutes Islam and what their faith means to them. That is what I've been in the process of doing.
If I want to learn about Judaism, I would do the following: read a decent history (or histories) of the Jewish people that would include ancient history, diaspora and spread, the differing sects, their status in Europe and Muslim countries, the events surrounding the founding of Israel and modern Israeli culture, and Jewish culture and views in the modern world. Read about what the actual beliefs are - what makes a person Jewish in faith. I would read the OT, read a good historical analysis of the OT (for example Issac Asimov's The Bible as History) and works by modern Jewish writers and historians. That is on my bucket list.
If I want to learn about Christianity, I would do the following: read some decent histories of the religion and it's spread throughout the world from ancient times, through reformation and to the modern world. I would read the NT and try to find some good books interpreting it and looking at it's history. Read about the different sects and divisions. Because Christianity is so wildly diverse - I would try to find a selection of books on the many divisions and what their beliefs are, written by people of those faiths. I would look for books by modern Christians on what it means to be a Christian in todays worlds. That is partially done but kind of on the back burner.
Lastly - I would look for good fiction by Jews, Christians, Muslims. Sound silly? Not necessarily - fiction provides a look at cultures.
What I would be very careful with is material written with obvious agendas and bias' against something though that can still be worth reading because it can give you the downside of particular religions - for example an athiests view of Catholocism or a Christian Apologist's view of Islam.
That's just my opinion Daniel. I grant you know more of Arab culture than I do - but that is not all of Islam and it is likely colored by your experiences as an Israeli. I think we all colored by our experiences (or lack of them) and mine are limited but include Muslims in N. America's Muslim communities as well as foreign students. They comprise a variety of communities though - Bangledesh, India, Somali, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Malaysia and of course - American.
This is going to be a very long post, I'll try to make it as short as possible.
First let me draw the line here, what you've studied in class is all one valuable thing, however you can't learn swimming by mail, after all actual experience has no equal.
Experience provides one value, but Daniel - experience can be colored by your own personal bias. Do you disagree? You and I have different experiences and I'll grant that your opinion carries the weight of direct experience. That doesn't make it right or wrong, it just validates your perspective.
I Would like to begin with what we do agree on, Islam- or most likely MUSLIMS* needs to go through a revolution, and it starts from here;
Maajid Nawaz “We Muslims must admit there are challenging Koranic passages that require reinterpretation today. Let us use existing tools of exegesis, such as specificity, restriction, abrogation and metaphor. Vacuous literalism as an interpretive method must be abandoned. It is bankrupt. Only by rejecting vacuous literalism are we able to condemn, in principle, ISIS-style slavery, beheading, lashing, amputation and other medieval practices forever (all of which are in the Quran). This is a struggle within Islam. Reformers either win, and get religion-neutral politics, or lose, and get ISIL-style theocracy.”
The Qura'n made it very clear, everything written in it is fully explained and clear, you must not take part of it or reinterpret it and be remained as a true Muslim - a true Islamic believer, otherwise they are to be considered hypocrites/disbelievers and every Muslim must fight them until they will testify* "The Messenger of Allah said: “that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah" - this is why you happen to find many Muslims citing IS is the true nature of Islam, and which is why IS also fight other Muslims.
To conclude I think that what you've learned in class is most likely inaccurate in case it is different than what's written in the Qura'n.
How do you know what I learned in class?
What you say in paragraph one - written by a Muslim - I totally agree with. This is a cross-roads for Islam.
You say: "this is why you happen to find many Muslims citing IS is the true nature of Islam" - but IS it "many Muslims"? There are millions of Muslims around the world - representing many cultures. How many support groups like ISIS? A fraction. Many come straight out and say ISIS' actions are un-Islamic.
ISIS' "supporters" come from several factions. One - Sunni's who (justifiably) felt maltreated and disenfranchised under the Iraqi Government and felt that things were so bad, supporting ISIS was marginally better.
Islamists - attracted by slick propaganda, by what they percieve as "true Islam" as you point out.
Yet even combined it's a small group in comparison to all Muslims.
The forms of violence Christianity went through began with the Crusaders and the Inquisition - we can argue about other cases but the point is - nothing last until our time, and this cases were when people reinterpreted Christianity to anything close to what Islam truly is by default.
Christianity became "civilized" - and why? NOT because of anything inherent in the religion. The religion's dogma provided rational for peace (as does Islam) but it also provided plenty of rational supporting forced conversions, conquest by war, and intolerance of non-believers. What civilized Christianity was not religion but humanism and secularism and the idea that human beings were endowed with certain rights that could not be granted or taken away by any authority. This also led to a seperation of church from government and that, in my belief - is what ultimately "civilized" that religion and it's the only thing that will civilize ANY religion. There is no instance I can think of where religion and government are intertwined and basic human rights and freedoms for all citizens are respected. Islamic majority countries still have a ways to go in that regard but just because they do doesn't mean they can't.
Now you also mentioned the OT/Judaism as a "death cult" - do you see Jews terrorizing other religions in the name of God? seriously now you just made a guessing here because the OT is only filled with history/prophecies and if you look closer to Judaism to the 613 commands you won't find anything close to what is written in the Qura'n - and what we see today, and if you want the people with all the reasons in the world to fight other religions - it be the Jews.
When I made that remark, it was in reference to a specific post - and that was in relation to what is written in religious texts. There is plenty of material in the OT to take and use to justify murder, intolerance and subjegation. One source I looked at compared violence in the OT and Quran and found many more references to violence, condoning or encouraging violence than in the Quran. One of the main points it made was references to violence, conducting war, etc in the OT were unconditional. The Quran includes specific references to when something is allowed and when it isn't and how it should be done. It is as specific about the "not allowed" as it is about the "allowed" and it sets forth rules for conduct - rules absent in the OT. That is the background of my statement: religious text.
If you look at people - you get a different story. I think in some ways Islam and Judaism, in religious belief are closer then either is to Christianity which I always see as kind of the flower child of religions becaues it goes out in all directions. Both Judaism and Islam have pretty strict and detailed outlines of codes of conduct for behavior. Both include a system of jurisprudence. Both emphasize charity and good works. I know more about Christianity and Islam however than I really do about Judaism so I'm always open for correction there. However, unlike Islam and Christianity - Judaism has never been a world religion, never been a political religion and always been a minority in any country it has been in. That profoundly alters it's conduct. Islam and Christianity have played major roles on the world stage and unlike Judaism both are proselytizing religions with an agenda - convert as many as possible. In both cases - when they were a minority, proselytizing was done by gentle conversion and both Islam and Christianity had something to offer in the way of a better life or afterlife. Once they became a power, that fell by the wayside and conversion was often by force and war or, a ruler who became converted then converted all his people. In that regard - in terms of long lengthy bloody warfare, discrimination, intolerance, brutality - there is no difference between Christianity and Islam. That's history.
Today, Christianity has been able to put most of it behind them but it still simmers beneath the surface because - along with the positive, Christs love and tolerance, lies the negative that can be used to justify abuse. Much of the Islamic world has not gotten to that point because to do so means you also have to allow for secularism, the concept of human rights independent of religion. I think Islam, in it's confrontation and adaptation to the West and it's ideals - is grappling with how to deal with these things and the result is what we see now.
I have a vast experience with Muslims starting from some of my friends and some are my enemies, I also have a vast experience about Arabs of all religions and Arabs are mainly influenced by Islam, but still different than Arab Muslims that we are discussing about, sadly since you was expecting to "be convinced" by David Wood's video, you didn't pay any attention to what he said, and I'm here to confirm every word.
But not all Muslims are Arabs - in fact, most aren't. There are vast cultural differences between Muslims in Eastern European "stans", Mid East, Africa, Indonesia, India, N. America and western Europe (which comrises a multi-national group as well as multi-generational natives).
The reason we all see uprising violence in Europe and MANY controversial words coming from Muslims we find ourselves confused, since you do understand what Tribalism is I believe it is not hard for you to understand why everything going that way in Europe, the Muslims are simply see themselves and other Muslims superior, and they don't try to blend in - to live as Europeans, that is all fair and fine, except that we are talking about Muslims, do you see any connection now? France is currently in what David Wood called 'Defensive Jihad' - they(the true Muslims) got offended by a cartoon and went spraying 12 people along with the police officers, they've managed to escape like the last terrorists because this happened in a Muslim AREA, again - phase two - 'Defensive Jihad'.
I disagree with this because you lump all Muslims together regardless of their countries or cultures of origin. Somali's are not Bangladeshi's. In addition is the issue of "assimilation" - the degree of assimilation varies according to host country and the country of origin. Some assimilate very well, some not - it's far from uniform.
Defensive Jihad. Did you know that most of the tips on terrorists that we have gotten have come FROM our Muslim communities with police and Muslim leaders working closely together? One recent example - the two teenage girls from Colorado attempted to join ISIS and were apprehended in Germany. How were they apprehended? Concerned parents approached their religious leaders who approached law enforcement.
If you also want to look at the Israeli-Palestinian situation you can find everything is according to this pattern, so please take a look again and instead of completely denying tell me again which parts of the Qura'n you consider as mistranslated or fake.
The Quran, like the Bible, contains many passages that should be understood in the context of the period rather than excised out and looked at in a vaccuum. When someone take ONLY the quotes pertaining to war, and omits the quotes pertaining to peace - I'm not saying it's mistranslated or fake - but it's "cherry picked" and dishonest.
It happens all over the world, 25,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11 is just 'the extremists' but what if it was completely reversed and we all were left for the mercy of Muslims? - remember the last time one ideology crowned over any sort of human rights?
Europe is going to chaos and this is only the beginning, its about time to acknowledge that.
No.
Because falling to that mindset is no different then falling to the 1930's anti-Jewish propoganda and you know where that ended up.