Eric Swalwell Vows to Target Private Citizens If Dems Win a Majority

[Crepitus]

And mostly terrorists.

 

[Crepitus]

Yes they are look at the antifa punks, BLM and other low IQ turds.

Gonna getcha!

 

[Crepitus]

Nah, just stupid and violent.

You're confused.

 

[JusticeHammer]

You're confused.

You're delusional

 

[Crepitus]

You're delusional

Irrelevant. You are still confused.

 

[JusticeHammer]

The only way I see it ending is for congress to pass laws codifying what is and isn't acceptable. We have always depended up the integrity of our elected officials to act in an honorable way, and with a few exceptions they mostly behaved honorably. That has changed. We can't legislate integrity, but we can define acceptable behavior.

In your mind who was the last honorable politician? It sure wasn't a dem

 

[JusticeHammer]

Irrelevant. You are still confused.

Nope

 

[Crepitus]

Nope

Well, that's what you would say either way, isn't it?

 

[Nostra]

Problem is… they found no evidence of that

Lies.

 

[westwall]

You're confused.

Nope. You clowns are easy to decipher.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Well, that's what you would say either way, isn't it?

Nope

 

[Lesh]

Lies.

Provide the evidence then

 

[Nostra]

Provide the evidence then

You provided zero evidence with your claims.

It’s in you to prove your claims, Simp.

 

[Lesh]

You provided zero evidence with your claims.

It’s in you to prove your claims, Simp.

Which claims?
You want proof of no evidence?

It doesn’t work that way stupid

 

[ThisIsMe]

The only way I see it ending is for congress to pass laws codifying what is and isn't acceptable. We have always depended up the integrity of our elected officials to act in an honorable way, and with a few exceptions they mostly behaved honorably. That has changed. We can't legislate integrity, but we can define acceptable behavior.

Really? Who gets to define what is acceptable and what isnt? Because I promise you, THAT would be as big of a disagreement as anything else.

 

[BULLDOG]

Really? Who gets to define what is acceptable and what isnt? Because I promise you, THAT would be as big of a disagreement as anything else.

The general behavior and integrity we have counted on from all presidents before trump would be a good start. Just because you can find a loophole that allows unethical behavior doesn't mean you should do it. Other presidents knew this and mostly behaved accordingly. Not trump.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The general behavior and integrity we have counted on from all presidents before trump would be a good start. Just because you can find a loophole that allows unethical behavior doesn't mean you should do it. Other presidents knew this and mostly behaved accordingly. Not trump.

don't get me wrong. I don't care for how trump conducts himself, but you seem to be suggesting that we have some sort of entity that can decide what's acceptable, and what's not. If that's the case good luck.

 

[westwall]

The general behavior and integrity we have counted on from all presidents before trump would be a good start. Just because you can find a loophole that allows unethical behavior doesn't mean you should do it. Other presidents knew this and mostly behaved accordingly. Not trump.

Obummer's integrity? Are you stoned?

 

[BULLDOG]

don't get me wrong. I don't care for how trump conducts himself, but you seem to be suggesting that we have some sort of entity that can decide what's acceptable, and what's not. If that's the case good luck.

Trump's behavior is only acceptable to his cult.

 

[BULLDOG]

Obummer's integrity? Are you stoned?

The straw man that trump and his cult built and called Obama doesn't resemble the man in the least.