End of the War?

[kyzr]

That’s typical thinking of a Zionist establishment dupe. Stop believing propaganda by the Zionist establishment.

Israel has a huge nuclear arsenal and is obviously far more dangerous than Iran. Ever heard of the Samson Option?

Israel has had nukes a long time without use, Samson or no Samson, Iran can't be trusted with nukes.
I'm not Zionist, I'm not a fan, but Iran needs a regime change.

 

[luiza]

"Iran is desperate to make a deal" says Trump, everyday since the first week of March.

Now Iran mocks him.

'Trust Me BRO Failed': Iran BRUTALLY MOCKS Trump ...​

View attachment 1253313
The Times of India
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com › videos › videoshow




3 hours ago — Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf ridiculed the Trump administration after Washington halted naval efforts assisting ships through the Persian Gulf chokepoint.

Ghalibaf mocked the move on X, writing that “Operation Trust Me Bro failed” while sarcastically referring to “Operation Fauxios.” President Donald Trump claimed the pause followed requests from Pakistan and other nations and insisted negotiations with Tehran were progressing.


Even Iran knows bloviating Trump is a joke.

But don’t overlook that they are all just playing their scripted parts .
A successful Energy and Food starvation project makes multi billions for the organisers and with luck might kill a billion or two billion Sheeple .
Perfect for the organisers and the Committee of 300 .
Could earn Trumpfy an unlimited supply of Adrenochrome .

 

[gipper]

Israel has had nukes a long time without use, Samson or no Samson, Iran can't be trusted with nukes.
I'm not Zionist, I'm not a fan, but Iran needs a regime change.

It’s been reported that Israel has threatened to use the Samson option. I guess you don’t know that.

A nation mass murdering its indigenous population and attacking its neighbors is extremely dangerous and heinous.

Think!

 

[kyzr]

It’s been reported that Israel has threatened to use the Samson option. I guess you don’t know that.

Never heard of it until now.

Why the world should worry about Israel’s nuclear doctrine

The threshold the Israeli authorities have set for the use of a nuclear weapon is dangerously low.

www.aljazeera.com

A nation mass murdering its indigenous population and attacking its neighbors is extremely dangerous and heinous. Think!

That describes Iran.

 

[gipper]

Never heard of it until now.

Why the world should worry about Israel’s nuclear doctrine

The threshold the Israeli authorities have set for the use of a nuclear weapon is dangerously low.

www.aljazeera.com

That describes Iran.

Hopefully you realize how uninformed you are.

 

[SaxonJackson]

This time it seems a little more solid.

Fingers crossed. The global economy needs this ASAP.

U.S., Iran closing in on memo to end war: Report

I think the only way Trump's war ends is when our economy collapses. Trump is too proud to admit that Iran won this war. He's too bullheaded to find a way out. And he's too controlled by Israel to disobey their mandate.

Remember, they bought him for $230 Million. Couple that with the fact that he's an "Israel First," Zionist shill who's bought into the religious fallacy that the Khazars are "God's chosen people." There's this odd belief that Trump is doing "God's work" and helping the "chosen race" reclaim their ancestral land. A complete joke.

As usual, I keep up with the Iran war by listening to Daniel Davis/Deep Dive and I especially like when Col Douglass MacGregor is on the show. I continue to emphasis to my friends, family, and coworkers the importance of preparing for the hard times that are likely heading our way. We can talk until the cows come home but taking real action is a far better use of our time and energy.

 

[SaxonJackson]

You think. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. If Iran gets nukes all the other Gulf states will need to get nukes.
Their nuclear weapons program is the only reason for the aggression. Think. They don't need nukes.

There are no greater "state sponsors of terrorism" than Israel and the USA. And by "USA" I mean the Globalist/Zionists running D.C. ... not the American people and the America First, Constitutionalists.

I'm guessing here: But if Iran weathers this storm, they WILL develop a nuke to curb any future aggression against their citizens. If Is-A-Real-Hell has them then it's in Iran's best interest to have them as well. The best way to fight a bully with a club is to have a bigger club.

 

[Mac1958]

I think the only way Trump's war ends is when our economy collapses. Trump is too proud to admit that Iran won this war. He's too bullheaded to find a way out.

He's demonstrating why authoritarian regimes always ultimately fail ugly. We're seeing it with Putin now. The "great leader" is surrounded by yes men and incompetent loyalists who are either too afraid (Rubio) or too stupid (Hegseth) to say anything. Nary a discouraging word. So Trump is being led around by the nose and panicking.

It's bad enough when the "great leader" is intelligent and strategic. But this is Trump we're talking about.

I guess he's going to China in a few days. Maybe Xi can talk some goddamn sense into him. But nothing seems to overrride Trump's profound self esteem issues.

 

[gipper]

There are no greater "state sponsors of terrorism" than Israel and the USA. And by "USA" I mean the Globalist/Zionists running D.C. ... not the American people and the America First, Constitutionalists.

I'm guessing here: But if Iran weathers this storm, they WILL develop a nuke to curb any future aggression against their citizens. If Is-A-Real-Hell has them then it's in Iran's best interest to have them as well. The best way to fight a bully with a club is to have a bigger club.

Of course you’re right about Israel and the US being the greatest sponsor of terrorism. This is undeniable and obvious. Yet dumb Americans will say Iran is the greatest. This allows these fools to think they’re right to support Trump’s war crimes against Iran.

Can’t fix stupid.

 

[kyzr]

There are no greater "state sponsors of terrorism" than Israel and the USA. And by "USA" I mean the Globalist/Zionists running D.C. ... not the American people and the America First, Constitutionalist.

I'm guessing here: But if Iran weathers this storm, they WILL develop a nuke to curb any future aggression against their citizens. If Is-A-Real-Hell has them then it's in Iran's best interest to have them as well. The best way to fight a bully with a club is to have a bigger club.

So you think that if Trump leaves the current regime intact that they will keep pursuing nuclear weapons?
If that is true the US could "mow the grass" again in the future (bomb them again and close Hormuz) to dissuade them from that goal.
Even if Iran gets nukes, they will never have a bigger club than the US has.

 

[SaxonJackson]

So you think that if Trump leaves the current regime intact that they will keep pursuing nuclear weapons?
If that is true the US could "mow the grass" again in the future (bomb them again and close Hormuz) to dissuade them from that goal.
Even if Iran gets nukes, they will never have a bigger club than the US has.

But it's possible that Iran could have a bigger club than their immediate threat, Israel.

If I were the leader of Iran, I'd pursue nuclear weaponry. The fact that they didn't have nukes is what made them "sitting ducks" in the first place. Israel/Trump wouldn't have started this war if Iran HAD been armed with nukes. Israel could not survive a nuclear strike.

Interestingly, the only terrorist nation in the history of the world that ever used a nuke (or two) was FDR's terrorist regime.

 

[kyzr]

But it's possible that Iran could have a bigger club than their immediate threat, Israel. Israel could not survive a nuclear strike.

Israel has 90-400 warheads. Plus Israel has the "Iron Dome" ABM system, so getting bombs thru isn't guaranteed.

If I were the leader of Iran, I'd pursue nuclear weaponry. The fact that they didn't have nukes is what made them "sitting ducks" in the first place. Israel/Trump wouldn't have started this war if Iran HAD been armed with nukes.

No other Gulf states have nukes and they are prospering. Iran's sponsoring terrorism is what makes them "sitting ducks".
If Iran keeps pursuing nukes they will continue to be punished. Slow learners.

Interestingly, the only terrorist nation in the history of the world that ever used a nuke (or two) was FDR's terrorist regime.

Ending WW2 is not "terror". Those two nukes actually saved millions of lives.

https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/Book-Reviews/Display/Article/2462838/atomic-salvation-how-the-a-bomb-saved-the-lives-of-32-million-people/

Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people. His calculations are detailed, and his argument is persuasive. If the atomic bombs were the final straw that pushed the emperor to step out of his traditional role and side with civilians willing to negotiate surrender, then his case is persuasive. But are those the only alternatives? Were there other factors at play?

 

[EdwinAMartin]

It’s been reported that Israel has threatened to use the Samson option. I guess you don’t know that.

A nation mass murdering its indigenous population and attacking its neighbors is extremely dangerous and heinous.

Think!

lol this nutjob welfare case thinks Israel has been 'committing genocide' since 1947, and yet the palis have 5 times the population they had in 1947 ....



He probably knows he's just a lying piece of shit, really.

 

[EdwinAMartin]

Israel has 90-400 warheads. Plus Israel has the "Iron Dome" ABM system, so getting bombs thru isn't guaranteed.

No other Gulf states have nukes and they are prospering. Iran's sponsoring terrorism is what makes them "sitting ducks".
If Iran keeps pursuing nukes they will continue to be punished. Slow learners.

Ending WW2 is not "terror". Those two nukes actually saved millions of lives.

https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/AUPress/Book-Reviews/Display/Article/2462838/atomic-salvation-how-the-a-bomb-saved-the-lives-of-32-million-people/

Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people. His calculations are detailed, and his argument is persuasive. If the atomic bombs were the final straw that pushed the emperor to step out of his traditional role and side with civilians willing to negotiate surrender, then his case is persuasive. But are those the only alternatives? Were there other factors at play?

Most people who actually know anything about it realize that the Japanese still had millions of soldiers under arms at the time, and civilian resistance cells were already being formed and armed. Saxon here is just a retarded psychopath, is all.

 

[gipper]

lol this nutjob welfare case thinks Israel has been 'committing genocide' since 1947, and yet the palis have 5 times the population they had in 1947 ....



He probably knows he's just a lying piece of shit, really.

If only you weren’t a dupe of the Zionist establishment.