kyzr
Diamond Member
Israel has had nukes a long time without use, Samson or no Samson, Iran can't be trusted with nukes.
I'm not Zionist, I'm not a fan, but Iran needs a regime change.
End of the War?
- Thread starter Mac1958
- Start date
I'm not Zionist, I'm not a fan, but Iran needs a regime change.
luiza
Diamond Member
But donāt overlook that they are all just playing their scripted parts .
A successful Energy and Food starvation project makes multi billions for the organisers and with luck might kill a billion or two billion Sheeple .
Perfect for the organisers and the Committee of 300 .
Could earn Trumpfy an unlimited supply of Adrenochrome .
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 80,612
- 44,789
- 2,605
Itās been reported that Israel has threatened to use the Samson option. I guess you donāt know that.
A nation mass murdering its indigenous population and attacking its neighbors is extremely dangerous and heinous.
Think!
kyzr
Diamond Member
Never heard of it until now.
Why the world should worry about Israelās nuclear doctrine
The threshold the Israeli authorities have set for the use of a nuclear weapon is dangerously low.
That describes Iran.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 80,612
- 44,789
- 2,605
Hopefully you realize how uninformed you are.Never heard of it until now.
Why the world should worry about Israelās nuclear doctrine
The threshold the Israeli authorities have set for the use of a nuclear weapon is dangerously low.www.aljazeera.com
That describes Iran.
I think the only way Trump's war ends is when our economy collapses. Trump is too proud to admit that Iran won this war. He's too bullheaded to find a way out. And he's too controlled by Israel to disobey their mandate.
Remember, they bought him for $230 Million. Couple that with the fact that he's an "Israel First," Zionist shill who's bought into the religious fallacy that the Khazars are "God's chosen people." There's this odd belief that Trump is doing "God's work" and helping the "chosen race" reclaim their ancestral land. A complete joke.
As usual, I keep up with the Iran war by listening to Daniel Davis/Deep Dive and I especially like when Col Douglass MacGregor is on the show. I continue to emphasis to my friends, family, and coworkers the importance of preparing for the hard times that are likely heading our way. We can talk until the cows come home but taking real action is a far better use of our time and energy.
There are no greater "state sponsors of terrorism" than Israel and the USA. And by "USA" I mean the Globalist/Zionists running D.C. ... not the American people and the America First, Constitutionalists.
I'm guessing here: But if Iran weathers this storm, they WILL develop a nuke to curb any future aggression against their citizens. If Is-A-Real-Hell has them then it's in Iran's best interest to have them as well. The best way to fight a bully with a club is to have a bigger club.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #48
He's demonstrating why authoritarian regimes always ultimately fail ugly. We're seeing it with Putin now. The "great leader" is surrounded by yes men and incompetent loyalists who are either too afraid (Rubio) or too stupid (Hegseth) to say anything. Nary a discouraging word. So Trump is being led around by the nose and panicking.
It's bad enough when the "great leader" is intelligent and strategic. But this is Trump we're talking about.
I guess he's going to China in a few days. Maybe Xi can talk some goddamn sense into him. But nothing seems to overrride Trump's profound self esteem issues.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 80,612
- 44,789
- 2,605
Of course youāre right about Israel and the US being the greatest sponsor of terrorism. This is undeniable and obvious. Yet dumb Americans will say Iran is the greatest. This allows these fools to think theyāre right to support Trumpās war crimes against Iran.
Canāt fix stupid.
kyzr
Diamond Member
So you think that if Trump leaves the current regime intact that they will keep pursuing nuclear weapons?
If that is true the US could "mow the grass" again in the future (bomb them again and close Hormuz) to dissuade them from that goal.
Even if Iran gets nukes, they will never have a bigger club than the US has.
But it's possible that Iran could have a bigger club than their immediate threat, Israel.
If I were the leader of Iran, I'd pursue nuclear weaponry. The fact that they didn't have nukes is what made them "sitting ducks" in the first place. Israel/Trump wouldn't have started this war if Iran HAD been armed with nukes. Israel could not survive a nuclear strike.
Interestingly, the only terrorist nation in the history of the world that ever used a nuke (or two) was FDR's terrorist regime.
kyzr
Diamond Member
Israel has 90-400 warheads. Plus Israel has the "Iron Dome" ABM system, so getting bombs thru isn't guaranteed.
No other Gulf states have nukes and they are prospering. Iran's sponsoring terrorism is what makes them "sitting ducks".
If Iran keeps pursuing nukes they will continue to be punished. Slow learners.
Ending WW2 is not "terror". Those two nukes actually saved millions of lives.
Lewis estimates that the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, to the extent that it induced Japanese surrender, saved the lives of roughly 30 million people. His calculations are detailed, and his argument is persuasive. If the atomic bombs were the final straw that pushed the emperor to step out of his traditional role and side with civilians willing to negotiate surrender, then his case is persuasive. But are those the only alternatives? Were there other factors at play?
Similar threads
