Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

[tinydancer]

So is Trump going to pay up the one million?

why? it didn't show she was american indian. it shows she was .097 mexican, colombian or peruvian.

Trump on a fly by.....the deal was just the test. He's not a politician so he ***** up more than not. But he must be held to the standard.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So is Trump going to pay up the one million?

He better

First ask her to retake the test at a lab of his choice; if the results are the same he'll donate it to a Native American cause, **** Lizzy Cheekbones

 

[easyt65]

I heard Warren opened up her own restaurant but it did not do so well.......

(You can see she grew her hair out since this picture..... bwuhahahaha)


.

 

[Cecilie1200]

No. She paid some Stanford liberal to find she may be 1.56% Indian. LOL! What a FRAUD!

You are unhinged dude.

This stupid shit is why you focus on POLICY AND NOT PERSONALITY.

EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN who mocked her heritage including me now look like childish ******* morons. You can now bet your last damn dollar that there will be ads with various GOP officials mocking her and the ad will end with her DNA results.

This is what happens when you play petty politics.

If you want to pretend she found something that supported the lies she's been telling because the media told you she did, instead of being aware of what she ACTUALLY SAID versus the ACTUAL RESULTS, that's your problem, not ours.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So is Trump going to pay up the one million?

why? it didn't show she was american indian. it shows she was .097 mexican, colombian or peruvian.

Trump on a fly by.....the deal was just the test. He's not a politician so he ***** up more than not. But he must be held to the standard.

How funny would it be if Trump has more Indian DNA than Lizzy Cheekbones?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So is Trump going to pay up the one million?

why? it didn't show she was american indian. it shows she was .097 mexican, colombian or peruvian.

Trump on a fly by.....the deal was just the test. He's not a politician so he ***** up more than not. But he must be held to the standard.

How funny would it be if Trump has more Indian DNA than Lizzy Cheekbones?

Trump probably does have more Indian DNA.

*******, Lithuanians have more Indian DNA and then Warren

 

[Siete]

I thought a lying politician was the standard for RW's -

 

[easyt65]

First ask her to retake the test at a lab of his choice; if the results are the same he'll donate it to a Native American cause, **** Lizzy Cheekbones

The burden of proof is on Warren!

She is GUILTY of being a European White Chick until PROVEN innocent!

She should demand the FBI investigate this immediately! If she doesn't it means she is definitely GUILTY of being a European White chick!



(The lessons we learned from the Democratic Party's 'Herman Cain'ing of Judge Kavanaugh )

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I thought a lying politician was the standard for RW's -

A lying politician is the standard for politicians. Don't be naïve.

 

[Joann Stubbs]

The stupidity of tRumpkins knows no bounds.

You ask for proof and she gets it for you but you still don't believe it.

It's called Trumpanzee-ism.... monkey see, monkey do... I don't expect any of them anymore, to ever tell the truth.... truth is VOID among the whole lot... they follow the leader.... in to the Lake of Fire! Sad!

so - the dems never lie?

please. for the love of god this generic stereotyping bullshit really needs to stop.

I wonder if it was rape, or accident, or marrage, or slave. The ME/To bunch might fit in.

 

[buckeye45_73]

More on Pocahontas. Ain't this a Hoot!
_______

It Gets Better… Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren

It Gets Better... Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren
______________________________

But, to be honest, this Bat-Shit Crazy ***** doesn't deserve the time being spent to ridicule her.

She could NOT get elected to anything more than Dog Catcher outside of LoonLands like Massachusetts----might have a chance in Shitholia (Connecticut).

Wouldn't .098% be if she was only 1/1024th NA, instead of 1/32?
They're playing math tricks on ya, Macaulay.

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy ***** had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

When propagandists say it is reported they mean here is another piece of crap...

it's just a talking point for him to claim victory, he considers 1/32 an actual indian......think about that..he supports the one drop theory, Even NAZIS thought that was harsh

 

[Sunsettommy]

Elizabeth Warren has taken a DNA test.

The results show she wasn't lying.

trump and the republicans have been lying all this time.

The truth is that most American families that have been here for a long time have Native American Indian somewhere in the past in their families.

I do. Like Warren it was a long family story that many generations back someone married a Cherokee woman. I never believed it until I took a DNA test. There it was. Just like Warren, a very small part of my DNA has Native American Indian. Just like the family story, it's very small which means it's many generations back.

Just like most Americans.

So go ahead and call her names. You're only showing your hate and ignorance.

Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

Her Genealogy records back to early 1800's shows ZERO evidence of an Indian Ancestor, plus she isn't recognized as a Cherokee by the Indian nations, thus NOT an Indian at all.

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 1

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 2

"Now we are seeing a very clear pattern develop. We are back to the great great grandparent generation, and Ms. Warren's ancestors are still only being found as white in the documents. On the other hand, Chief Baker's ancestors are found as Cherokee Indians. And notice that even though Sarah Harlin was born in 1834 and Indian, there are plenty of records to document both her existence and the fact she was Cherokee. We have 6 sources for her and all verify she is Cherokee even though many people wrongly assume records are harder to find if your ancestor was Indian/Cherokee.

Since the forced removal of the Cherokees was in 1838, we have gotten back to that time with both families. Preston H. Crawford was born approximately fourteen years before the forced removal and Sarah Harlin was born about four years before the removal.

The Crawford family was always listed as white in the records and remained in the east after the forced removal of the Cherokees. The Harlin family was always living among Cherokees and always listed as Indians. These two families are clearly found listed differently in the records.

In Elizabeth Warren's family, we have gotten to approximately 1824, fourteen years prior to the removal of the Cherokees from the east and there is no indication of Indian blood or association with the Cherokees through her Crawford line, the line she claims to be Cherokee through. That means we have gone back about 188 years and still not found a Cherokee. "​

 

[francoHFW]

What a bunch of welching cheats and Liars Republicans are....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That matches what she had claimed. Sad for you.

No, she claimed to be at least 1/16th Indian.
Turns out she is more likely 1/1000th.

No, she said exactly what the DNA test says. But keep parroting the BS.

1/1024 is not American Indian
Any Caucasian of America can say what she is saying… And most of them would have more credibility percentagewise

1/32

That is her claim from a few years ago, but the DNA result shows a LOT less than that. It seems she keeps finding a way to be

Elizabeth Warren has taken a DNA test.

The results show she wasn't lying.

trump and the republicans have been lying all this time.

The truth is that most American families that have been here for a long time have Native American Indian somewhere in the past in their families.

I do. Like Warren it was a long family story that many generations back someone married a Cherokee woman. I never believed it until I took a DNA test. There it was. Just like Warren, a very small part of my DNA has Native American Indian. Just like the family story, it's very small which means it's many generations back.

Just like most Americans.

So go ahead and call her names. You're only showing your hate and ignorance.

Elizabeth Warren's DNA test results point to Native American heritage

Her Genealogy records back to early 1800's shows ZERO evidence of an Indian Ancestor, plus she isn't recognized as a Cherokee by the Indian nations, thus NOT an Indian at all.

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 1

Elizabeth Warren's Ancestry - Part 2

"Now we are seeing a very clear pattern develop. We are back to the great great grandparent generation, and Ms. Warren's ancestors are still only being found as white in the documents. On the other hand, Chief Baker's ancestors are found as Cherokee Indians. And notice that even though Sarah Harlin was born in 1834 and Indian, there are plenty of records to document both her existence and the fact she was Cherokee. We have 6 sources for her and all verify she is Cherokee even though many people wrongly assume records are harder to find if your ancestor was Indian/Cherokee.

Since the forced removal of the Cherokees was in 1838, we have gotten back to that time with both families. Preston H. Crawford was born approximately fourteen years before the forced removal and Sarah Harlin was born about four years before the removal.

The Crawford family was always listed as white in the records and remained in the east after the forced removal of the Cherokees. The Harlin family was always living among Cherokees and always listed as Indians. These two families are clearly found listed differently in the records.

In Elizabeth Warren's family, we have gotten to approximately 1824, fourteen years prior to the removal of the Cherokees from the east and there is no indication of Indian blood or association with the Cherokees through her Crawford line, the line she claims to be Cherokee through. That means we have gone back about 188 years and still not found a Cherokee. "

The only Indian blood from her ancestors was when one of them killed an Indian

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What a bunch of welching cheats and Liars Republicans are....

Duppe, wussamatta?

 

[Cecilie1200]

No. She paid some Stanford liberal to find she may be 1.56% Indian. LOL! What a FRAUD!

The test result page does say that the person working on the sample did not know the identity of the sample donor at the time the work was done. Absent any proof otherwise, I will give them the benefit of the doubt.

However, if you read all the way down to the bottom of the report, you find this interesting segment: "For Native American references, we used sample within the 1000 Genomes project of Native American ancestry; these samples come from Mexico, Peru, and Colombia. (It is not possible to use Native American reference sequences from inside the United States, since Native American groups within the US have not chosen to participate to participate in recent population genetics studies.)"

So she had her DNA tested to prove her tale of Native American ancestry - which has always focused on US Native Americans - by a group whose reference samples don't actually include any US Native Americans.

And at that, her claim to "Native American" is actually about half what your average white American can claim. Hell, I'M more Native American than she is, and you don't see ME going to around claiming to be one. You certainly don't hear me telling tall tales about how "my parents had to elope to escape racism because my mother was Native American" or asking my employers to list me as Native American ethnicity.

that's gonna leave a mark.

Yep, The test proves that she is even less of the ratio that most Caucasians in this country are...
But she has high cheekbones

Proves her original story as written in her book about having a distant Grandmother who was native American is credible due to scienrific evidence.

What about this story?



Or this one?

During her academic career as a law professor, she had her ethnicity changed from white to Native American at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where she taught from 1987 to 1995, and at Harvard University Law School, where she was a tenured faculty member starting in 1995. (She was a visiting professor at Harvard during the 1992-1993 academic year.)

Elizabeth Warren releases results of DNA test on Native American ancesty - The Boston Globe

Her ethnicity is no more "Native American" than is the vast majority of white people in this country, or even a large percentage of black people in this country. She's actually LESS Native American than most of us, if you're not the Boston Globe and carefully talking only about white people in Utah.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

What a bunch of welching cheats and Liars Republicans are....

This is true, but not for the reasons you think.

 

[easyt65]

I wonder if it was rape, or accident, or marrage, or slave. The ME/To bunch might fit in.

The way she looks now....had to be RAPE ... and the Native American gene definitely got watered down...if not out completely!

 

[OldLady]

More on Pocahontas. Ain't this a Hoot!
_______

It Gets Better… Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren

It Gets Better... Average White Person in America Has DOUBLE THE AMOUNT of Native American DNA as Elizabeth Warren
______________________________

But, to be honest, this Bat-Shit Crazy ***** doesn't deserve the time being spent to ridicule her.

She could NOT get elected to anything more than Dog Catcher outside of LoonLands like Massachusetts----might have a chance in Shitholia (Connecticut).

Wouldn't .098% be if she was only 1/1024th NA, instead of 1/32?
They're playing math tricks on ya, Macaulay.

_____________

Honestly, Old Lady, I don't think you can be educated....and in spite of your consistent embarrassing inanities posted too often on this board, I have left you alone for that reason.....and also out of sympathy for what is very likely much advanced age accompanied by some dementia.

But, here is a light math and genetics lesson.

If this lying goofy ***** had a full blooded Indian Great-Grandparent, she would have 1/8th Indian Blood, or .125 decimal interest (the same as 1.25 per cent). That is the MINIMUM amount of Indian Blood that will get you recognized by an Indian Tribe! Most require 1/4 Indian Blood---which would mean a full blooded Indian Grandparent--two generations up the chain of heredity.

Pocahantas flunks this test by a mile. She doesn't have a even Have a Great-Great-Great-Great-Grand Parent who was a full blooded Indian---that would make her 1/64 Indian (.015625 decimal interest)---her own specialist---who was probably a liar, as most Liberals are---said she wasn't even that close--- she was possibly up to the tenth generation or 1/1024 also called .000977 decimal interest.

Now that's her man's story and he wasn't even sure---and she went all over the country to find him, so there is rightful suspicion there....and an independent analysis would be required if anybody gave enough of a Shit--which I do not.

And it is now reported that the AVERAGE AMERICAN has more Indian Blood than Pocahantas's own bogus Sanford expert says he "thinks" she might have.

Her own privately, surreptitiously hired test man, a liberal tool from Sanford, said she might have no more than .000977 Indian Blood---the Cherokees would laugh her off the Reservation, as the American People will laugh her out of any race she runs outside of LoonLand in the NorthEast.

This was never about her being a Tribal member. She told us that family tradition said she had an ancestor back along the line who was Native American, and she has taken the test and it is true. She did. I don't remember anyone talking about specific percentages in that article which reported the results. You did that, basing it on your own guesses for what percentage she might be.
It doesn't matter. She was right; the DNA tests prove it, and Trump needs to cough up the one mil.
You can try to insult me all you want, but you're the one who is being either confused or dishonest here, not me.

 

[Wry Catcher]

She never claimed a significant portion and for that matter she never used it to gain advantage in school. What she claimed was supported in the DNA test you challenged her to take. Why not just admit she is right and let I go instead of digging in deeper? Surely you can find other things to attack her on?

"I" challenged her?

And we only have the word of her colleagues at Haaaarvard that they didn't consider her "heritage" in her application.

Whose word do you have that says they DID consider her heritage when they hired her??

Why would she claim it unless it conferred on her some perceived advantage?

When filling out an application sure to be vetted, why lie? I have no doubt Sen. Warren was reporting family lore, and by taking a DNA test she was vindicated, and her DNA evidence supported what she had believed true.

In fact, my experience is that an application for employment asks a question of ethnicity, but the Q. and A. is on a tear off sheet for administrative purposes only.

Human Resources is not to use this information for hiring purposes, but some may do so, and it is on them (Harvard) and not on Sen. Warren if that was a factor reported to the Federal Authority.

She has no more Native American DNA than most people who's families have been here for as long as hers.

1/32-1/1024th isn't recognized by pretty much any tribe out there.

So F'n what? First of all that's not true; more importantly, you are a hack who hates Democrats, liberals and progressives for some reason, when you don't know all of them. That's pathological. Worse, you let Trump and the Republican Pols slide with their hate and fear mongering, lies and efforts to deny suffrage to American citizens.