Ummm, no. No such claim was made as a point of debate. That would be y'all.
Ya see, claiming one's ancestry contains some element can go a lot of ways. As you found out when you had to ignore 32,754 people so you could focus on two. Could be ancestor number 46. Could be number 117. Could be both, and/or others.
Claiming the negative though, that there's an absolute. That's a far higher standard, because now you have to eliminate everybody. If a single exception slips through, your point falls like a house of cards in a tornado.
Whooooosh.
The only thing we have to eliminate is Lizzie's credibility if she can't support her claim that she's a Cherokee Indian.
You can't prove the negative, so that ain't gonna happen.
How fucking dumb are you?
Seriously
What, to expect you to see logic? You have a point. But that's on you, not me.
You're saying you can prove the negative? Cool, then do it. That's what I've been telling you the whole time, Einstein.
Logic: Liz got caught lying
Lie: Frank made a post.