Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Electoral College: Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19
- Thread starter Grizz
- Start date
Moxie2
Who is John Galt?
"On December 19, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots. If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, they can vote for Hillary Clinton if they choose. Even in states where that is not allowed, their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine - which we can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay!
We are calling on the Electors to ignore their states' votes and cast their ballots for Secretary Clinton."
Electoral College Electors: Electoral College Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19
More hypocrisy.
Never happening.
Trump is our president.
End of story.
Moxie2
Who is John Galt?
Question: Can the Electoral College Vote for Trump as President and Clinton as VP?
Or would they have to split votes where nobody gets 270,
then the House could vote for two different people and don't have to pick from the given tickets?
Answer: Doesn't matter. Hillary Clinton just lost the election and has been retired.
Grizz
Gold Member
- Jun 27, 2015
- 2,440
- 312
- 160
- Thread starter
- #24
"On December 19, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots. If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, they can vote for Hillary Clinton if they choose. Even in states where that is not allowed, their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine - which we can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay!
We are calling on the Electors to ignore their states' votes and cast their ballots for Secretary Clinton."
Electoral College Electors: Electoral College Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19
More hypocrisy.
Never happening.
Trump is our president.
End of story.
Oh I agree, but I love pointing out their hypocrisy.
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,823
- 350
I'm so sick of liberals being completely intolerant when they don't get their way. Just learn to deal with life like an adult. We put up with Obama and his liberal policies for 8 years. No one went to the streets and rioted or attacked people. No one cried about changing the rules. College kids didn't piss and moan and get out of taking tests.
Disagree all you want with how he does things, but stop with the petty bullshit. Right now, the whiney ass babies are throwing public tantrums because they didn't get their way. They claim to be the party of peace and tolerance but they are anything but that when they can't control things. Grow the fuck up. All those idiots burning cars and beating people up should be in jail. It's disgusting and I refuse to give any of them sympathy when they act like total douchebags.
Disagree all you want with how he does things, but stop with the petty bullshit. Right now, the whiney ass babies are throwing public tantrums because they didn't get their way. They claim to be the party of peace and tolerance but they are anything but that when they can't control things. Grow the fuck up. All those idiots burning cars and beating people up should be in jail. It's disgusting and I refuse to give any of them sympathy when they act like total douchebags.
Moxie2
Who is John Galt?
"On December 19, the Electors of the Electoral College will cast their ballots. If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, they can vote for Hillary Clinton if they choose. Even in states where that is not allowed, their vote would still be counted, they would simply pay a small fine - which we can be sure Clinton supporters will be glad to pay!
We are calling on the Electors to ignore their states' votes and cast their ballots for Secretary Clinton."
Electoral College Electors: Electoral College Make Hillary Clinton President on December 19
More hypocrisy.
Never happening.
Trump is our president.
End of story.
Oh I agree, but I love pointing out their hypocrisy.
That's a full time job my friend!
I found these select responses posted this elsewhere and co-opted this material
NOT MINE but thanks to others for posting these:
=============================================
"You evidently think the Hillary won all those electoral votes in red states because she barely won the popular vote. It doesn't matter if she won in a select few areas that predominantly are liberal and full of welfare recipients. The electoral college gives all states a vote."
"In perhaps the most stunning political story in American history, the folks rejected corruption and unfair federal policies and delivered vast power to a maverick political novice who is promising to treat working Americans with respect."
"Question: Would you be willing to allow California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois alone to decide the who the President is going to be? If the election was decided based on the popular vote alone, those states would be the only ones that matter. If you those five states combined populations, they equal more then all the total votes cast in this election. That is why the Electorate College was derived. Now, if you want a suggestion that would work. Take a page from Nebraska and Maine's book. Divide the state into Electoral Districts. The Popular vote for that district would chose who that Electoral Delegates votes for. In other words, keep the Electoral College. Just get rid of the winner take all part. Simple!!!"
NOT MINE but thanks to others for posting these:
=============================================
- if something horrible comes out about Trump, he could lose the Electoral College vote.
Hillary only needs 40 more votes to win - I know that the Electoral College could elect Hillary, if we find out some horrible (*)(*)(*)(*) about Trump, or if he commits a horrible crime.
"You evidently think the Hillary won all those electoral votes in red states because she barely won the popular vote. It doesn't matter if she won in a select few areas that predominantly are liberal and full of welfare recipients. The electoral college gives all states a vote."
"In perhaps the most stunning political story in American history, the folks rejected corruption and unfair federal policies and delivered vast power to a maverick political novice who is promising to treat working Americans with respect."
"Question: Would you be willing to allow California, Texas, New York, Florida and Illinois alone to decide the who the President is going to be? If the election was decided based on the popular vote alone, those states would be the only ones that matter. If you those five states combined populations, they equal more then all the total votes cast in this election. That is why the Electorate College was derived. Now, if you want a suggestion that would work. Take a page from Nebraska and Maine's book. Divide the state into Electoral Districts. The Popular vote for that district would chose who that Electoral Delegates votes for. In other words, keep the Electoral College. Just get rid of the winner take all part. Simple!!!"
Last edited:
Rexx Taylor
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #28
i am hearing that the devil doesnt want hillary when she passes,,,but south chicago will find a place to bury her
yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
impeach her for being a witch.Impeach her from what?Cant we just impeach Hillary next week and send her to Canada?
Hillary is unemployed, and has been for a while.
How do you know she is a witch?
ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
Apparently the only results that are "valid" are those that the Left accepts.
Or valid could mean ignoring the vote and making...umm, what the word? Ahh, backroom deals with politicians.
Right? Riiiiight?
yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Dear Care4all
We could change it where the winner has to get majority of BOTH electoral and popular votes.
Then we could face a runoff in December by ALL people not just Electors.
Wouldn't that be a media circus?
Would the media back this so they can make even more money off more hype that never ends?
- Nov 5, 2012
- 23,017
- 14,102
- 1,405
This is just how liberals roll. They only accept things when it favors them. I suppose some electoral voters will be receiving some death threats over the next month. Stay classy, libs.
Here is a typical anti-Trump protester.
Well that was pretty democrat. Not sure what it was but it wasn't class or civilized.
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
The current system works just fine. You want to go with popular vote? You deny smaller populated states a voice, the majority silences the minority. Nope.
I truly can not believe the number of people who do not understand this.
I truly can not believe the number of people who do not understand this.
- Nov 5, 2012
- 23,017
- 14,102
- 1,405
Pissed off about the electoral college? How about we give each county one vote. I'm pretty sure the left would not be for that.yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Dear Care4all
We could change it where the winner has to get majority of BOTH electoral and popular votes.
Then we could face a runoff in December by ALL people not just Electors.
Wouldn't that be a media circus?
Would the media back this so they can make even more money off more hype that never ends?
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
This is just how liberals roll. They only accept things when it favors them. I suppose some electoral voters will be receiving some death threats over the next month. Stay classy, libs.
Here is a typical anti-Trump protester.
That is disgusting, what a pig. I despise leftists more and more each day.
Truly, the electoral college serves no purpose now, we did not have a popular vote when it was created...and now we do vote....and like with all other elected positions, it should be our vote that counts in a national election imo.yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Dear Care4all
We could change it where the winner has to get majority of BOTH electoral and popular votes.
Then we could face a runoff in December by ALL people not just Electors.
Wouldn't that be a media circus?
Would the media back this so they can make even more money off more hype that never ends?
TheDude
Gold Member
Cool, awesome. Just remember we don't play dirty like a cheap liberal. We actually get shit done. Righteousness is on our side too. Come and get it, see what happens.
why would we do that? why not just let the citizen's vote count?Pissed off about the electoral college? How about we give each county one vote. I'm pretty sure the left would not be for that.yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Dear Care4all
We could change it where the winner has to get majority of BOTH electoral and popular votes.
Then we could face a runoff in December by ALL people not just Electors.
Wouldn't that be a media circus?
Would the media back this so they can make even more money off more hype that never ends?
Pissed off about the electoral college? How about we give each county one vote. I'm pretty sure the left would not be for that.yes, they can do it, and they are SUPPOSE to do it....that's what the constitution says and that's how hamilton and madison created electors to be.... make their own decision on who to vote for..... not even coordinating with other electors in their State, but an informed, individual, decision....not by party, not by popular vote but they alone were to make their own individual decision.
Then politics got involved, and electors figured out they could have more power if they colluded together on who to pick as their candidate...and it's been all downhill since then...
ONE MAN, ONE VOTE....every elected position in the USA is picked that way....governors, senators, congressmen, legislators, county clerk, sheriff, school board members etc....
except our President.... it's bull crud.
IF TRUMP had won the popular vote but Hillary won the electoral vote, Trump would be tweeting from the rafters, the election was rigged, the system is rigged....
when wisonsin gets 3 electors for 500k citizens, and california with 39 million citizens gets 55, then the citizens in their state's vote does not count equally with a citizen in Wisconsin....that's simply not right, not fair, not just. one man, one vote against another man's vote, should be equal
if calif had the same proportion of electors as wisconsin citizens get, california would have 195 electors, not the 55....
it's stupid and highly unfair.
Dear Care4all
We could change it where the winner has to get majority of BOTH electoral and popular votes.
Then we could face a runoff in December by ALL people not just Electors.
Wouldn't that be a media circus?
Would the media back this so they can make even more money off more hype that never ends?
No Missouri_Mike
Where do you get that I am not RELIEVED that Trump won because of the Electoral System this time?
If a candidate has to win BOTH votes that INCLUDES the Electoral College, it doesn't reject it at ALL!!!
Are you trying to clarify that if there is a runoff, we should use the same system again?
And have ALL the people vote for just those two candidates,
and then use the Electoral system again for the runoff?
Okay, SURE! Whatever it takes to ensure the Winner wins
BOTH the Popular and Electoral Vote so we don't have this nonsense afterward.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 217
- Replies
- 33
- Views
- 496
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 288
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 145
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 78
- Replies
- 622
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 99
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8045
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-