Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact is this: PC misstates and fabricates all the time, so I am never concerned with her concussions: they will be false.
Voter fraud, by members of both parties, is a concern that needs to be addressed.
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens 2008 2010 Self reported and/or verified 38 (11.3%) 13 (3.5%) Self reported and verified 5 (1.5%) N.A. Adjusted estimate 21 (6.4%) 8 (2.2%) Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens 2008 2010 Self reported and/or verified 38 (11.3%) 13 (3.5%) Self reported and verified 5 (1.5%) N.A. Adjusted estimate 21 (6.4%) 8 (2.2%)
We also find that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective. Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted.
An alternative approach to reducing non-citizen turnout might emphasize public information. Unlike other populations, including naturalized citizens, education is not associated with higher participation among non-citizens. In 2008, non-citizens with less than a college degree were significantly more likely to cast a validated vote, and no non-citizens with a college degree or higher cast a validated vote. This hints at a link between non-citizen voting and lack of awareness about legal barriers
The blah balh is based on a CCES project, the polling pardner of which is a consumer driven company that produces results the customer wants. Got to "Home" on the website and READ carefully.
The fact that are GOP is losing nationally is that too much of the party is out of step with the 21st century.
"PC misstates and fabricates " Never. And the give-away that exposes what a lying low-life you are is the lack of examples.The fact is this: PC misstates and fabricates all the time, so I am never concerned with her concussions: they will be false.
Voter fraud, by members of both parties, is a concern that needs to be addressed.
Could non-citizens decide the November election?
How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010.
.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens 2008 2010 Self reported and/or verified 38 (11.3%) 13 (3.5%) Self reported and verified 5 (1.5%) N.A. Adjusted estimate 21 (6.4%) 8 (2.2%) Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. Non-citizen votes could have given Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health-care reform and other Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) won election in 2008 with a victory margin of 312 votes. Votes cast by just 0.65 percent of Minnesota non-citizens could account for this margin. It is also possible that non-citizen votes were responsible for Obama’s 2008 victory in North Carolina. Obama won the state by 14,177 votes, so a turnout by 5.1 percent of North Carolina’s adult non-citizens would have provided this victory margin.[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Estimated Voter Turnout by Non-Citizens 2008 2010 Self reported and/or verified 38 (11.3%) 13 (3.5%) Self reported and verified 5 (1.5%) N.A. Adjusted estimate 21 (6.4%) 8 (2.2%)
We also find that one of the favorite policies advocated by conservatives to prevent voter fraud appears strikingly ineffective. Nearly three quarters of the non-citizens who indicated they were asked to provide photo identification at the polls claimed to have subsequently voted.
An alternative approach to reducing non-citizen turnout might emphasize public information. Unlike other populations, including naturalized citizens, education is not associated with higher participation among non-citizens. In 2008, non-citizens with less than a college degree were significantly more likely to cast a validated vote, and no non-citizens with a college degree or higher cast a validated vote. This hints at a link between non-citizen voting and lack of awareness about legal barriers
Could non-citizens decide the November election - The Washington Post
The blah balh is based on a CCES project, the polling pardner of which is a consumer driven company that produces results the customer wants. Got to "Home" on the website and READ carefully.
The fact that are GOP is losing nationally is that too much of the party is out of step with the 21st century.
Is that why they have a majority in the US House of Representatives?
The blah balh is based on a CCES project, the polling pardner of which is a consumer driven company that produces results the customer wants. Got to "Home" on the website and READ carefully.
The fact that are GOP is losing nationally is that too much of the party is out of step with the 21st century.
Is that why they have a majority in the US House of Representatives?
Because those are local elections, not national.
Keep up, please.
Explanations or sour grapes?
I believe I saw your name mentioned prominently in item #2a in the OP!
You must be bursting with pride!
I agree with Frank.
Voter ID required to be available eight months before major state elections at no expense.
I agree with Frank.
Voter ID required to be available eight months before major state elections at no expense.
"PC misstates and fabricates " Never. And the give-away that exposes what a lying low-life you are is the lack of examples.The fact is this: PC misstates and fabricates all the time, so I am never concerned with her concussions: they will be false.
Voter fraud, by members of both parties, is a concern that needs to be addressed.
You always seek confirmation bias not enlightenment.
That is why you are such a monumental failure.
Explanations or sour grapes?
I believe I saw your name mentioned prominently in item #2a in the OP!
You must be bursting with pride!
Takes one to know one?
It's been the narrative all along that there is no way America would elect a black man so he must have cheated.
