Eden Garden of the GodS

[Taz]

Scriptures don't prove god, they just tell a lot of unsubstantiated stories.

Incorrect, but it is an endeavor.

So how do scriptures prove god?

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

 

[Taz]

So now the bible is an attempt by aliens to contact us?

Ya, sound like you have several wormholes in your brain.

lol....very funny coming from captain kangaroo.


Scripture makes it clear that God and his angels are not of this world.

The prophecy about the kingdoms of the world becoming one with the kingdom of God and his Christ is a prophecy about an alien conquest ...

You sure that wasn't in the Hobbit?

ha ha. you won't be laughing when your bloody flesh is stripped from your broken bones and eaten by the birds of heaven because you did not become 'like one of us." when you had the chance,,,,

Prove to me that there's a place called heaven, and show me what kind of birds they have there please.

Ok...

You have been carefully chosen to be fitted with a corrective lens for your brain..

Do not be alarmed if you wake up one morning with fuzzy memories of being strapped to a gurney and probed by aliens.

At the very least you will become less of an asshole.

You made the statement, I simply asked you to back it up. You can't, so you call me an asshole. Typical. You guys need a new schtick.

 

[Indeependent]

Incorrect, but it is an endeavor.

So how do scriptures prove god?

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

 

[Indeependent]

Incorrect, but it is an endeavor.

So how do scriptures prove god?

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

 

[Taz]

So how do scriptures prove god?

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

 

[Indeependent]

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

Prove to me the world is billions of years old.
Oh! That’s right, you can’t.
Isn’t extrapolation great?

 

[Indeependent]

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

How much time are you willing to spend?

 

[Taz]

So how do scriptures prove god?

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

Science can reverse itself when it find that a theory is proven wrong. That pisses you off because you know that your theories can't be right, but yet you refuse to budge.

 

[Indeependent]

How much study does any specialty take?
Scientific studies show that coffee is good for you.
Scientific studies show that coffee is bad for you.
Scientific studies show that antibacterial soap is good for you.
Scientific studies show that bacterial soap is bad for you.
How many years of studying biology and chemistry to know who’s right and maybe they both are...or nit.

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

Science can reverse itself when it find that a theory is proven wrong. That pisses you off because you know that your theories can't be right, but yet you refuse to budge.

Not when it comes to “extrapolated” science.
We need a time machine.

 

[Taz]

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

Prove to me the world is billions of years old.
Oh! That’s right, you can’t.
Isn’t extrapolation great?

Is that your way of saying that you CAN'T prove god through scripture? Then your concession is duly noted.

 

[Indeependent]

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

Prove to me the world is billions of years old.
Oh! That’s right, you can’t.
Isn’t extrapolation great?

Is that your way of saying that you CAN'T prove god through scripture? Then your concession is duly noted.

You want an answer in one post?
Can you explain how your body works in one post?
I didn’t think so.
You’re what we call intellectually dishonest.

 

[Taz]

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

How much time are you willing to spend?

Stop playing with your weenie and just go for it.

 

[Indeependent]

It’s my way of saying that knowing something requires study.
Criticism of people who aren’t bothering you requires arrogance.
Presuming you don’t have people preaching to you all the time.

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

How much time are you willing to spend?

Stop playing with your weenie and just go for it.

Taz and an ad hominem!

 

[Taz]

Is this your way of saying that you don't know and just made up that prior statement?

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

Science can reverse itself when it find that a theory is proven wrong. That pisses you off because you know that your theories can't be right, but yet you refuse to budge.

Not when it comes to “extrapolated” science.
We need a time machine.

Science reverses itself all the time given new contradicting data, they aren't locked in a position that is unchanging and illogical like you are.

 

[Taz]

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

Prove to me the world is billions of years old.
Oh! That’s right, you can’t.
Isn’t extrapolation great?

Is that your way of saying that you CAN'T prove god through scripture? Then your concession is duly noted.

You want an answer in one post?
Can you explain how your body works in one post?
I didn’t think so.
You’re what we call intellectually dishonest.

Your concession has already been duly noted. You can stop digging now. And as it stands, you CAN'T prove god through scripture, that much you've proven for sure!

 

[Indeependent]

Those studies are fact.

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

Science can reverse itself when it find that a theory is proven wrong. That pisses you off because you know that your theories can't be right, but yet you refuse to budge.

Not when it comes to “extrapolated” science.
We need a time machine.

Science reverses itself all the time given new contradicting data, they aren't locked in a position that is unchanging and illogical like you are.

What exactly is unchanging?

 

[Indeependent]

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

Prove to me the world is billions of years old.
Oh! That’s right, you can’t.
Isn’t extrapolation great?

Is that your way of saying that you CAN'T prove god through scripture? Then your concession is duly noted.

You want an answer in one post?
Can you explain how your body works in one post?
I didn’t think so.
You’re what we call intellectually dishonest.

Your concession has already been duly noted. You can stop digging now. And as it stands, you CAN'T prove god through scripture, that much you've proven for sure!

The originator of the ad hominem is the giver of the course concession speech.
In 5 years we will be mocking half the scientific theories floating around today.

 

[Taz]

I simply asked you how do scriptures prove god? So far you have nothing. Then why make that statement?

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

How much time are you willing to spend?

Stop playing with your weenie and just go for it.

Taz and an ad hominem!

LOL! You're right, I did it! Ok, I'll stop, will you?

 

[Indeependent]

How do scientists prove that something is 200 billion years old?
They spend years studying.

In terms of science, you have nothing because NYC was supposed to be under water by now.

Global cooling was the scientific rage of the 70s.

You see how it all works out?

Science is theory, not proof.

So are you going to prove how the scriptures prove god or not?

How much time are you willing to spend?

Stop playing with your weenie and just go for it.

Taz and an ad hominem!

LOL! You're right, I did it! Ok, I'll stop, will you?

Engage in what is important to you that you have yet to master.
I do not discuss automotive engines because I am not willing to surrender another pursuit in exchange for what it will take to attain such expertise.

 

[Taz]

What facts?

I see you don’t pay attention to weekly studies that all wind up being agendas disguised as science.

Science can reverse itself when it find that a theory is proven wrong. That pisses you off because you know that your theories can't be right, but yet you refuse to budge.

Not when it comes to “extrapolated” science.
We need a time machine.

Science reverses itself all the time given new contradicting data, they aren't locked in a position that is unchanging and illogical like you are.

What exactly is unchanging?

Your book of the Big Ghost.