What did he do?Thanks Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What did he do?Thanks Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2.9% is the "best growth"?!?
I'm sorry....are you saying it is not the best growth in 2 years? When in the last two years was the change in real GDP higher?2.9% is the "best growth"?!?
Do you prog leg humpers have seriously low standards, or what?
That didn't answer my question. You were questioning the claim that 2.9% was the best growth in the last 2 years. So is 2.9% the best growth in the last 2 years or not? Bush was not President in the last 2 years, btw.We haven't had back-to-back quarters of GDP growth over 3% since li'l Bushy left office..
I'm sure all five of them will.Good news that should please every American.
It should be, but the lunatic RWers who hate America will whine, as we see.
92 million out of work, that is not the labor force, that us the amount out of work. I do nit see any numbers that refute that figure.I didn't say that (though you do realize your 92 million figure excludes the unemployed?). If you take the number of employed PLUS the number of unemployed that is the "Labor Force" Divide the Labor Force by the adult civilian non-institutional population and you get the percent of people in the population who are either working or trying to find a job. How do you think that gives a number of people "out of work?"unemployed has nothing to do with out of work?Those are not the same thing. The labor force participation rate is the number of employed plus the number of unemployed as a percent of the adult civilian noninstitutional population. Nothing to do with "out of work."
And you still haven't stated what you're defining as "out of work" or linked to a source.
the most basic question is whether or not you're calling people who don't want to or are unable to work "out of work?" That would not be normal usage.
lies, all lies, debt increased, spending increased every year under clinton.If Clinton lowered healthcare costs why did Obama have to fix it?Wrong again as always!
Clinton & Democrat Congress CUT Spending before Repubtard Congress came along to take credit!!!
Republican President Bush & Republican Congress EXPLODED Spending, Deficits & Debt!!!
Clinton Lowered Healthcare Cost!!!
Healthcare Cost EXPLODED under Republican President Reagan / Bush & Republican Congress!!!
Clinton cut spending? Right, from a 20% increase to 19.6% increase. ha, ha, liberal math and reasoning is great.
Repubtards Explode Healthcare Cost! Clinton Lowered it!
Clinton & Democrat Congress CUT Spending before Repubtard Congress came along to take credit!!!
Clinton Cut Government Spending by nearly 20%!!!
Republican President Bush & Republican Congress EXPLODED Spending, Deficits & Debt!!!
You leftist love high health care cost as you push for a government run healthcare system. Hillary Clinton wants massive expiation of government spending are you voting for her nutter?..What did Bill Clinton do to lower healthcare cost?
You are truly clueless!
It's called economically running government so it delivers what we pay for. Verses creating massive inflation by cutting taxes while spending more & not allowing government we pay more for to regulate. All elected Republicans & candidates signed Pledge to bankrupt the government who's very faith & credit that backs the US Dollar! They Love Inflation taxing workers to fatten wallets of the 0.1% that own most thing being inflated.
Reagan / Bush increased spending allowed RECORD CRIME rate!!!
Clinton Cut spending & Crime at Record rate!!!
But the unemployed are in the labor force. "The labor force includes all persons classified as employed or unemployed in accordance with the definitions contained in this glossary." Glossary92 million out of work, that is not the labor force, that us the amount out of work. I do nit see any numbers that refute that figure.I didn't say that (though you do realize your 92 million figure excludes the unemployed?). If you take the number of employed PLUS the number of unemployed that is the "Labor Force" Divide the Labor Force by the adult civilian non-institutional population and you get the percent of people in the population who are either working or trying to find a job. How do you think that gives a number of people "out of work?"unemployed has nothing to do with out of work?Those are not the same thing. The labor force participation rate is the number of employed plus the number of unemployed as a percent of the adult civilian noninstitutional population. Nothing to do with "out of work."
And you still haven't stated what you're defining as "out of work" or linked to a source.
the most basic question is whether or not you're calling people who don't want to or are unable to work "out of work?" That would not be normal usage.
lies, all lies, debt increased, spending increased every year under clinton.If Clinton lowered healthcare costs why did Obama have to fix it?Wrong again as always!
Clinton & Democrat Congress CUT Spending before Repubtard Congress came along to take credit!!!
Republican President Bush & Republican Congress EXPLODED Spending, Deficits & Debt!!!
Clinton Lowered Healthcare Cost!!!
Healthcare Cost EXPLODED under Republican President Reagan / Bush & Republican Congress!!!
Clinton cut spending? Right, from a 20% increase to 19.6% increase. ha, ha, liberal math and reasoning is great.
Repubtards Explode Healthcare Cost! Clinton Lowered it!
Clinton & Democrat Congress CUT Spending before Repubtard Congress came along to take credit!!!
Clinton Cut Government Spending by nearly 20%!!!
Republican President Bush & Republican Congress EXPLODED Spending, Deficits & Debt!!!
You leftist love high health care cost as you push for a government run healthcare system. Hillary Clinton wants massive expiation of government spending are you voting for her nutter?..What did Bill Clinton do to lower healthcare cost?
You are truly clueless!
It's called economically running government so it delivers what we pay for. Verses creating massive inflation by cutting taxes while spending more & not allowing government we pay more for to regulate. All elected Republicans & candidates signed Pledge to bankrupt the government who's very faith & credit that backs the US Dollar! They Love Inflation taxing workers to fatten wallets of the 0.1% that own most thing being inflated.
Reagan / Bush increased spending allowed RECORD CRIME rate!!!
Clinton Cut spending & Crime at Record rate!!!
As I stated, under Bill Clinton the Debt went up every year, it never went down. In order for debt to increase you must increase spending without having enough money to pay for the increase, hence you borrow. Bill Clinton borrowed money to spend, every year he was in office.
Remember, Democrats must always lie, or repeat a lie unwittingly. If they know the truth they lie, if they claim they are not lying, they still are, they are just not smart enough to know.
Government - Historical Debt Outstanding - Annual 1950 - 1999
Date
9/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992 4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 2,857,430,960,187.32
Dollar Amount
09/30/2015 18,150,617,666,484.33
09/30/2014 17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 11,909,829,003,511.75
09/30/2008 10,024,724,896,912.49
09/30/2007 9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 6,783,231,062,743.62
09/30/2002 6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
NO, you are ignorant! A FISCAL YEAR ENDS IN SEPTEMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!You Lie! You post debt from earlier in September, not end of calendar year 1999 to end of calendar year 2000.
I'm sorry....are you saying it is not the best growth in 2 years? When in the last two years was the change in real GDP higher?2.9% is the "best growth"?!?
Do you prog leg humpers have seriously low standards, or what?
NO, you are ignorant! A FISCAL YEAR ENDS IN SEPTEMBER!!!!!!!!!!!!You Lie! You post debt from earlier in September, not end of calendar year 1999 to end of calendar year 2000.
Further, it is the government reporting this, not me. My link is to the United States of America Treasury Department. Check the link, it is to a .gov That is the government.
Seriously, where are you getting all your figures, it is obvious now, that you are simply posting lies, given the fact that you do not know that the budget is based on fiscal years, not calendar years.
I can not believe the level of stupidity "kissmy" has displayed.
It will be revised 3 times. Are you claiming all three will be lower, just the first revision or the final from the advance estimate? And how do you know it'll be down?I'm sorry....are you saying it is not the best growth in 2 years? When in the last two years was the change in real GDP higher?2.9% is the "best growth"?!?
Do you prog leg humpers have seriously low standards, or what?
Pathetic... and it'll be revised down