HaShev
Platinum Member
- Jun 19, 2009
- 17,995
- 7,288
- 375
FACT: nowhere does the founding church and it's texts reveal who this FATHER is.
Never is there a name. Sure we know Yeshu's father was the Roman soldier Pantheras, but Jesus is not merely the accounts of this one figure from a different era, he's made up of a convergence of many along with plagiarized mythologies and Bible stories of other figures.
So who is the Father that Rome was selling as this created images emulation trinity split personality?
It's real simple to solve the mystery:
1) he exposes it when (Rev 22:16) he calls himself the morning star=Baal's messenger through mere meaning of words, and in Canaanite mythology the son of Baal who must die to surpass his father on the throne is the morning star. In no way can the morning star be YHWH's son or reflection as it means, because it's the nemesis of YHWH.
The proper reflection is called the Evening Star (Michael).
2)Easter is a dead give away that Jesus father is Baal, because EASTER (ISHTAR/Isis) WAS THE WIFE OF THE SUN GOD BAAL & Mother of the Morning Star. The son of Ishtar was the 'fish' hatching out of the “giant egg” by the river bank, who is deemed Morning Star =Rev 22;16.
We know the original trinity was father/Mother/son and here we have Baal/Ishtar/Morning Star (Jesus)
3)Jesus image is created by the plagiarization of the Baal Passion Play (predated tablet housed in the Brittish Museum) exactly the same story including the same birthdate as Baal, thus he's but a mask for Baal worship given a new name and cultural image to lure as in bait the fishies hook line and sinker.
Hence the Church telling you the father and son are one, they are the same deity reinvented by the dying god mythology of the Canaanite rites.
4) So if father and son ar eone then the secreting of the number of his name would be Baal(lord) Jesus or Jesus Baal=666 in ASCII numerology used to secret numbers from names.
IN conclusion we now have Jesus "FATHER" that they kept hidden and never mentioned and the number of the beast is thus revealed. Maybe this is why they never mentioned the name?
Nope, it's because they were converging all the cultures into one world religion, so they couldn't mention a singular name that would offend the other worshiping cultures and their deities.
Hence needing to reinvent the deity through the dying god /son masking his father in a new name that converged all.
Never is there a name. Sure we know Yeshu's father was the Roman soldier Pantheras, but Jesus is not merely the accounts of this one figure from a different era, he's made up of a convergence of many along with plagiarized mythologies and Bible stories of other figures.
So who is the Father that Rome was selling as this created images emulation trinity split personality?
It's real simple to solve the mystery:
1) he exposes it when (Rev 22:16) he calls himself the morning star=Baal's messenger through mere meaning of words, and in Canaanite mythology the son of Baal who must die to surpass his father on the throne is the morning star. In no way can the morning star be YHWH's son or reflection as it means, because it's the nemesis of YHWH.
The proper reflection is called the Evening Star (Michael).
2)Easter is a dead give away that Jesus father is Baal, because EASTER (ISHTAR/Isis) WAS THE WIFE OF THE SUN GOD BAAL & Mother of the Morning Star. The son of Ishtar was the 'fish' hatching out of the “giant egg” by the river bank, who is deemed Morning Star =Rev 22;16.
We know the original trinity was father/Mother/son and here we have Baal/Ishtar/Morning Star (Jesus)
3)Jesus image is created by the plagiarization of the Baal Passion Play (predated tablet housed in the Brittish Museum) exactly the same story including the same birthdate as Baal, thus he's but a mask for Baal worship given a new name and cultural image to lure as in bait the fishies hook line and sinker.
Hence the Church telling you the father and son are one, they are the same deity reinvented by the dying god mythology of the Canaanite rites.
4) So if father and son ar eone then the secreting of the number of his name would be Baal(lord) Jesus or Jesus Baal=666 in ASCII numerology used to secret numbers from names.
IN conclusion we now have Jesus "FATHER" that they kept hidden and never mentioned and the number of the beast is thus revealed. Maybe this is why they never mentioned the name?
Nope, it's because they were converging all the cultures into one world religion, so they couldn't mention a singular name that would offend the other worshiping cultures and their deities.
Hence needing to reinvent the deity through the dying god /son masking his father in a new name that converged all.