HaShev

Platinum Member
Jun 19, 2009
17,995
7,288
375
FACT: nowhere does the founding church and it's texts reveal who this FATHER is.

Never is there a name. Sure we know Yeshu's father was the Roman soldier Pantheras, but Jesus is not merely the accounts of this one figure from a different era, he's made up of a convergence of many along with plagiarized mythologies and Bible stories of other figures.

So who is the Father that Rome was selling as this created images emulation trinity split personality?

It's real simple to solve the mystery:

1) he exposes it when (Rev 22:16) he calls himself the morning star=Baal's messenger through mere meaning of words, and in Canaanite mythology the son of Baal who must die to surpass his father on the throne is the morning star. In no way can the morning star be YHWH's son or reflection as it means, because it's the nemesis of YHWH.
The proper reflection is called the Evening Star (Michael).

2)Easter is a dead give away that Jesus father is Baal, because EASTER (ISHTAR/Isis) WAS THE WIFE OF THE SUN GOD BAAL & Mother of the Morning Star. The son of Ishtar was the 'fish' hatching out of the “giant egg” by the river bank, who is deemed Morning Star =Rev 22;16.

We know the original trinity was father/Mother/son and here we have Baal/Ishtar/Morning Star (Jesus)

3)Jesus image is created by the plagiarization of the Baal Passion Play (predated tablet housed in the Brittish Museum) exactly the same story including the same birthdate as Baal, thus he's but a mask for Baal worship given a new name and cultural image to lure as in bait the fishies hook line and sinker.

Hence the Church telling you the father and son are one, they are the same deity reinvented by the dying god mythology of the Canaanite rites.

4) So if father and son ar eone then the secreting of the number of his name would be Baal(lord) Jesus or Jesus Baal=666 in ASCII numerology used to secret numbers from names.

IN conclusion we now have Jesus "FATHER" that they kept hidden and never mentioned and the number of the beast is thus revealed. Maybe this is why they never mentioned the name?

Nope, it's because they were converging all the cultures into one world religion, so they couldn't mention a singular name that would offend the other worshiping cultures and their deities.

Hence needing to reinvent the deity through the dying god /son masking his father in a new name that converged all.
 
In Judaism Moshiach's are servants not served.
I'm not out to "get you", I'm out to
HaShev (redeem) you.
No one said the process is easy.

Bible verses like in Isaiah and later rehashed by Luke and Thomas declare : "the end will be like a woman giving birth". This means the end of the age will be painful, what you're told and shown will be painful, the transformation will be painful, but as a child being born what will come from this is a beautiful new birth. A new beginning will be born from this straightening of the path and the painful lessons learned through this transformation.
The scrolls warned about recognizing the task of the messenger:Hymn 14: "..they let fly those poisonous darts, vipers venom against which there is no charm;" (in other words countering or protecting from this behavior, or exposing it, will not seem gracious)1QM v, 1-2 (not to be confused with 1QM 1-2)Mentions:little room to act as the Royal Messiah while battling the Sons of Darkness. (Busy fighting through the smoke screens and deception before he can do his Messiah Roles), then it says:"God himself is the supreme agent of salvation and after him in importance is Michael."
People should Read hymns 12,13,& 14 in the scrolls that can be found online or in this forum searching my Hymn posts.
 
Mystery: Why the fish out of the egg on Ishtar day?
Probably because Baal's father was the fishman god called Dagon. Dagon priests wore fishead hats seen today as The Pope's Mitre, they wore fishscale robes still seen today on the trim of their robes, and the Pope still wears the fishman ring which they kiss in devotion to Baal's father just as Christians devote to morning stars father= Baal.
Revealing the true meaning of fishers of men.
 
Of course digging a little deeper the RCC claims the title of " father" as well... Not just the priests but even Simon who they claimed Peter but probably was " Pater" or father .... Simon the father this shows that not only are they not against stealing gds title for themselves but also taking the title of someone actual father and like a child they want you to confide in them your closely quarded secrets instead of going to your parents esp your father to get help...I also am curious if the teaching of the father and the son are one is the reason that many priests have unfortunately taken advantage of young boys as if their is some " hidden" teaching that it is okay for the "father" ( in this case the priest) to be joined with the " son"( in this case a young man or altar boy) as " one"....Maybe there is a deeper meaning to the word Ro man or was this practise borrowed from Mithraism or an older pagan ritual.....
 
The bent over brushing the hair cleaning the feet is a polite way of saying something else and was a mithraic sex ritual used in the story of the lady at the well? I think?
And the priests use that as an excuse for humility rituals on their own select, using the story as an excuse and leeway into unspeakable things.
The man boy statue in France? is said to secret something about the church and it's not the lineage it's probably the man-boy club it has become and the fleeing naked Lazarus story is
an obvious clue if not the secret in the statue itself.
 
Makes one wonder why a parent who loved their son would ever let any of their children near these guys unless they are so brainwashed that they just can't believe they would do such a despicable thing....
 

Forum List

Back
Top