Earth just had hottest 12 months in recorded history

Anything before the industrial revolution (not counting the 1930s of course) doesn't count!
I found (and posted) data for the last 11,000 years and 2 or 3 glacial/interglacial cycle before that which were all exceeded by this year's global temperature. I think that's enough to indicate something might be happening. No?
 
Last edited:
I just put this thread up this morning. I can't believe it has garnered this much response. I thought you all were tired of me.
It's called the Anomalism effect. You're welcome.
 
How do we fix it? Will we save the planet by convincing these ignorant rednecks that the scientists aren't lying to us?
If that's what it's gonna take then we are probably screwed. These guys are dumber than rocks and twice as hard headed.
 
If that's what it's gonna take then we are probably screwed. These guys are dumber than rocks and twice as hard headed.
No dude. Let's be honest right now. The truly frustrating part is these are not all objectively stupid people. They're just ignorant. And stubborn. They should be smart enough to fight their way out of the paper bag they've placed themselves in. It's more disappointing than anything, is it not?
 
No dude. Let's be honest right now. The truly frustrating part is these are not all objectively stupid people. They're just ignorant. And stubborn. They should be smart enough to fight their way out of the paper bag they've placed themselves in. It's more disappointing than anything, is it not?
If that were true we wouldn't be having this conversation. These people are dumb. There's no other explanation.
 
If that were true we wouldn't be having this conversation. These people are dumb. There's no other explanation.
Stubbornness and excessive arrogance often looks like stupidity. If they were all stupid we wouldn't be in the position that we're in with the state of the world. These people should not be underestimated.
 
But the people getting climate science studies published in refereed journals and the people putting together the IPCC's assessment reports - those people ARE climate scientists. And they all accept AGW theory as valid.

That's why governments put out so much data and transparent analysis.

Because the reams and reams of chlorine gas that will produce will be unpleasant to say the least.

Poster Anomalism doesn't seem to be debating the science. He's discussing YOUR relationship and the relationship of other deniers with the actual scientists doing climate research and their conclusions; something for which he seems perfectly qualified.
Those getting published are following the agenda that is pro-AGW/ACC. Those thousands that oppose this hypothesis are not getting published at anywhere near an equal volume.

Governments mostly fund only pro-AGW/ACC hence the bulk of the data they put out support an unproven hypothesis.

The reams and reams of chlorine gas produced depend upon reams and reams of 'chlorox' and ammonia. Typical household would be a cup or two of each. BTW, one of my brothers whom is a retired fire chief experienced scores of calls related to this sort of mixing mistake.

"Poster Anomalism" was trying to debate science, than realized he was in over his head, beyond his low knowledge level. Hence he shifted to a more ad homineum focus along with a "run away".

I notice you still do not "practice what you preach", "walk a walk consistent with the talk you talk". You are still consuming the very product of society you rail that we all should abandon. You are a full time dues paying member of the Hypocrite Club.
 
Stubbornness and excessive arrogance often looks like stupidity. If they were all stupid we wouldn't be in the position that we're in with the state of the world. These people should not be underestimated.
They are stupid. Sorry, but that's just the case. If they weren't they would be capable of looking at the evidence and drawing a conclusion. Instead what they do is repeat the garbage they've been spoon fed ad nauseum.

I'm stubborn.

They're programmed worker drones.
 
I suspect the article was referring to the recording of sufficient temperature data so that a global mean could be approximated. Of course, proxy data has been used for temperatures back 22,000 years and 800,000 years for ice cores.

Ummm... I don't think I'm the confused one here.

Do you have plans to ever give mainstream science any credence?
Do you have plans to give that part of mainstream science that disagrees with your political agenda any credence?
 
They are stupid. Sorry, but that's just the case. If they weren't they would be capable of looking at the evidence and drawing a conclusion. Instead what they do is repeat the garbage they've been spoon fed ad nauseum.

I'm stubborn.

They're programmed worker drones.
If you weren't stupid, and greedy and lazy, you'd realize that Conservatives/Republicans are about Wealth Creation and Meritocracy while lazy, non-productive parasites like you are all about plundering from the productive to "redistribute" to your useless, non-productive asses.

See your lying signature. 'Creepitass'!
 
I found (and posted) data for the last 11,000 years and 2 or 3 glacial/interglacial cycle before that which were all exceeded by this year's global temperature. I think that's enough to indicate something might be happening. No?
NO!
Not human caused that is. Nor related to CO2 levels.

You need to gauge over the past 4.5 Billion year history of this planet. Otherwise you have an insignificant glitch~'anomaly'.
 
Back
Top Bottom