*Durham Throws Cases, Working For Deep State*

[bripat9643]

Fucking moron...

‘Kind of Wild/Creative’: Emails Shed Light on Trump Fake Electors Plan

Previously undisclosed communications among Trump campaign aides and outside advisers provide new insight into their efforts to overturn the election in the weeks leading to Jan. 6.

www.nytimes.com

​

“We would just be sending in ‘fake’ electoral votes to Pence so that ‘someone’ in Congress can make an objection when they start counting votes, and start arguing that the ‘fake’ votes should be counted,” Jack Wilenchik, a Phoenix-based lawyer who helped organize the pro-Trump electors in Arizona, wrote in a Dec. 8, 2020, email to Boris Epshteyn, a strategic adviser for the Trump campaign.​

​

In a follow-up email, Mr. Wilenchik wrote that “‘alternative’ votes is probably a better term than ‘fake’ votes,” adding a smiley face emoji.​

So Trump didn't say that.

Thanks for playing!

 

[bripat9643]

Fucking moron, it wasn't a hung jury. To normal people, that means the decision was unanimous.

And it's "Scott free," not "Scott free." There's no one named Scott involved.

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

I said it would have been a hun jury, your fucking moron. That means the jury would have had to stay in session until they arrived at aa unanimous verdict. If enough people are against a conviction, the rest will go alone so they can go home.

 

[Aldo Raine]

lol

There is no 'deep state,' that's a lie contrived by the right.

Durham's cases are devoid of merit.

Yup, it certainly has not aged well.

 

[Lesh]

three years and millions wasted...another Republican FAIL.

 

[Faun]

So Trump didn't say that.

Thanks for playing!

I didn't say Trump said that. Seriously, fucking moron, is your brain too fried to comprehend English??

 

[Lesh]

I didn't say Trump said that. Seriously, fucking moron, is your brain too fried to comprehend English??

bripat?

Do ya KNOW who you're talking to?

There's nothing there to fry

 

[bripat9643]

I didn't say Trump said that. Seriously, fucking moron, is your brain too fried to comprehend English??

My question was "He used the word "fake" to describe them?"

Your answer was "no."

 

[Faun]

I said it would have been a hun jury, your fucking moron. That means the jury would have had to stay in session until they arrived at aa unanimous verdict. If enough people are against a conviction, the rest will go alone so they can go home.

That's not even what a hung jury is, you fucking moron. No, a hung jury doesn't deliberate until they all vote unanimously. So no, jurors don't just flip from convicting to acquitting just so they can go home. Most jurors take their role as juror very seriously.

Fucking moron, a hung jury is one that cannot reach a unanimous verdict. When that happens, the judge dismisses the case without prejudice.

Regardless of your abject ignorance, that's not what happened in this case. In this case, all jurors reached the same verdict. Which according to the nonsense YOU posted, makes them all Democrats. Which brings us full circle to .... Durham is also a fucking moron for stacking a jury with all Democrats, which is what you're idiotically claiming.

 

[bripat9643]

bripat?

Do ya KNOW who you're talking to?

There's nothing there to fry

Look at the biggest dumbass in the forum call others dumb.

 

[Faun]

My question was "He used the word "fake" to describe them?"

Your answer was "no."

Holyfuckingshit!

Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever???

Fucking moron: Who says they're fake other than morons like you?

Faun: A Trump allied attorney who was pushing for the fake electors, ya fucking moron.

Fucking moron: He used the word "fake" to describe them? Prove it.​

I added the emphasis to show what a fucking moron you are. I pointed out it was an attorney, not Trump, who called them "fake." So when you challenged me to prove "he" said it, you too were talking about the attorney, not Trump.

Just goes to show that not even you know what you're talking about.

 

[Faun]

Look at the biggest dumbass in the forum call others dumb.

Perhaps you're just too stupid to know this, fucking moron -- there is no one on this forum dumber than you. Not even close. My previous 2 posts exemplifies that fact.

 

[bripat9643]

That's not even what a hung jury is, you fucking moron. No, a hung jury doesn't deliberate until they all vote unanimously. So no, jurors don't just flip from convicting to acquitting just so they can go home. Most jurors take their role as juror very seriously.

Fucking moron, a hung jury is one that cannot reach a unanimous verdict. When that happens, the judge dismisses the case without prejudice.

The judge only does it after sending them back to the jury room several times and forces the to deliberate a lot longer than they normally would. That's not an experience that any jury wants to go through. That's why the settle on a verdict, you fucking moron

Regardless of your abject ignorance, that's not what happened in this case. In this case, all jurors reached the same verdict. Which according to the nonsense YOU posted, makes them all Democrats. Which brings us full circle to .... Durham is also a fucking moron for stacking a jury with all Democrats, which is what you're idiotically claiming.

You didn't contradict what I said, brain damage. They all eventually agree on a verdict, or it's a hung jury. Why they agreed hasn't been established. You just assume it.

Are you ever not a moron?

Ever?

 

[bodecea]

General Flynn on John Durham: “Whatever His Reputation as a Thorough Prosecutor was, is Now Gone”​

The General is right! too sad too bad

General Flynn on John Durham: "Whatever His Reputation as a Thorough Prosecutor was, is Now Gone"

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Is that the Russian troll talking point?

 

[bodecea]

Sorry bout that,

1. Its becoming obvious that those roaming the seats of American Politics, that 75% of them are *LIBTARDS*.
2. Only a fucking fool, doesn't see it.

Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

Same as American voters, loser.

 

[bodecea]

The evidence.

Which is?

 

[Care4all]

The evidence.

What evidence? Evidence shown in one of his court trials???

 

[Care4all]

Who says they're fake

Everyone!

 

[bripat9643]

Everyone!

Wrong.

 

[Care4all]

Wrong.

Nope! Even lawyers in Trump circles and trump campaign, knew it was illegal....the committee showed their emails stating such....

 

[bripat9643]

Nope! Even lawyers in Trump circles and trump campaign, knew it was illegal....the committee showed their emails stating such....

Whatever "it" is.

Wrong.