Durham: Perkins Coie Allies Connected to Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Campaign Spied on Trump’s Internet Traffic While Trump Was President

It would be better if you admitted to lying because now it's just proof you're an idioit.

Durham never said anything about it being nefarious. And if he did, that's Durham's interpretation. A particularly dastardly one too because he's casting aspersions about the behavior of people who aren't being charged with anything and have no chance to defend themselves in a court of law against his accusations. He does us the favor by not naming the person, but that's clearly not really working.

That's rich you flaming hypocrite. Would that you'd afford Rump the same courtesy.
 
Sorry, turd, but no accepts your standard that only convictions for voter fraud count as evidence.

My standard is the actual count, the recount, the hand count, the forensic audits, and the electoral count.

Along with EVERY court case on the topic of voter fraud in 2020. Along with Trump's own Department of Justice, which found no evidence of fraud sufficient to overturn the election.

And Trump's own Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council & the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Executive Committees.....which found this to be the most secure election in American history.

Your standard....is the My Pillow Guy.

Our sources are not equal.

Show us the evidence that every vote counted past 2 AM on November 4th, 2020......was fraudulent. You can't. Its a story you repeat to yourself, but it lacks evidence to support.

Which might explain your perfect record of failure in court.
 
oh shut it down, shut it down says crying joe Scarborough. It doesn't make sense...how could she be spying on White house when she wasn't in the white house to do it. Well...that's when you get the previous president to let them set it up...with his knowledge. Joe's trying to cover for the Kenyan Prince's butt.

he makes a great point…obviously there were connections and co-conspirators in the obama/xiden white house
 
Plus, some of those batches of late-arriving votes - 10,000 or more - went 99% for Biden and 1% for Trump. A statistical impossibility.
Who says that 'late arriving votes' were 99% Biden?

You mistake when votes were reported publicly for when votes were counted.

Even the Republican Election Managers in states as conservative as Georgia laughed your narrative out of the room. As has every court to take up the issue. You guys lost what? 60 cases?

Your fevered speculation and imagination doesn't hold up well in an actual court of law.
 
he makes a great point…obviously there were connections and co-conspirators in the obama/xiden white house

And by 'obviously', you mean 'you imagine'. As Durham's claims indicate that the DNS data was pulled from a university.

Why would Obama or Biden know about that? What evidence do you have that indicates as much? Where did Durham say as much in his reports?

You're offering us baseless speculation as fact. It isn't.
 
That’s fine.
Just don’t say that Trump represents the will of the people.
haha of course he’s election and that of the GOP Congress represented the will of the people. This is a democratic-republic, ruled by a Constitution that Clinton, the DnC, the obamagate gang and you cultist attacked
 
Not by the vote of the people. The majority of the people's vote has never gone to Trump.

You could argue that Trump won the electoral vote in 2016, in defiance of the popular vote - and you'd be right. But the argument being refuted is that Trump was the one with the support of the people.

And the popular vote in every election demonstrates that's nonsense. Trump never had the support of the people. The people *always* supported his opponent more than they supported Trump.

Only if you count all those dead people voting Democrat.
 
haha of course he’s election and that of the GOP Congress represented the will of the people. This is a democratic-republic, ruled by a Constitution that Clinton, the DnC, the obamagate gang and you cultist attacked

Nothing says 'ruled by the Constitution' like the GOP sending fraudulent electors and insisting that the outcome of a presidential election is determined soley by the VP.
 
And by 'obviously', you mean 'you imagine'. As Durham's claims indicate that the DNS data was pulled from a university.

Why would Obama or Biden know about that? What evidence do you have that indicates as much? Where did Durham say as much in his reports?

You're offering us baseless speculation as fact. It isn't.

Let it play out, we'll see.
 
Progs are morons. Pub automatically guilty. Dems innocent no matter what.

Says who? I haven't called for Trump to be put in prison NOW for say, threatening the Secretary of State of Georgia. Or to be put in prison NOW for tax evasion or fraud. I'm not saying that Trump should be put in prison NOW for sending insurrectionists to the Capitol and then sat and watched TV gleefully rather than act.

I'm content to let the grand juries and open investigations to run their course.
 
Not by the vote of the people. The majority of the people's vote has never gone to Trump.
because that's not how the game is played and it wasn't NECESSARY.

dipshit.

Post 998 crushes you. of course, thats why you ignored it.
 
Nothing says 'ruled by the Constitution' like the GOP sending fraudulent electors and insisting that the outcome of a presidential election is determined soley by the VP.
nobody said the outcome is determined solely by the VP, but the Consitution does make him the President of the Senate, and Congress has made a law allowing him to reject certain votes and not certify them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top