Hillary Clinton dodges questions about Durham probe developments

TYPICAL REACTION OF A COMMUNIST:
  1. Hillary and the Democrats conspire to interfere in an election campaign. Nailed to rights after DENIED for years.

'interference in a campaign' isn't a crime. Your ilk are going to need a better reason to start executing people.
  1. They committed espionage against a sitting president compromising national security of the Executive Branch.

Durham has accused no one of espionage. That you, citing yourself. And your source is inadequate to carry your argument.
  1. Failed all that, they admittedly finally stole the election in a last ditch effort to get Trump out. Mind you, of a president that had gven us a great economy, low crime, less regulations, bountiful food and energy independence.

Stole the election according to who? Certainly not the States whose electors went to Biden, any court, not the actual electors, not any count, recount, hand count, official count, forensic audit or electoral count.

So that would be you, citing yourself again.
  1. Finally instigating a riot from a simple protest to engineer a disaster to hang on Trump hoping to keep him out of politics forever.

Didn't your ilk blame anti-fa for that already? Then claimed it wasn't a riot but just a tour through the capitol building? And now you're blaming the ubiquitious 'them' for 'instigating a riot'.

And, of course, have jackshit to back any of it.
Now as the Durham report comes out revealing that Trump wasn't lying all along on these nefarious activities, and people rightly vow to exact justice for these heinous crimes, does a communist say: "That is terrible what happened, I share your anger!"? No. Instead, he makes those victimized in all this crime the subject calling THEM jihadis!

WELCOME to the fucked up warp, twisted mind of a far left subversive.

What 'heinous crimes' are you referring to? Remember, the only indictment is lying to investigators. No other charges have been filed against anyone.

Trump on the other hand is under TWO criminal investigations, with open grand juries reviewing evidence as speak. One for threatening the Secretary of State of Georgia to find more votes.
 
So you didn't claim that "On the other side is a bullet in the head, and another notch in the Clinton Body Count."?

You're using a dipshit conspiracy to justify the stunning lack of any charges against Clinton by Durham.

Or by anyone else.
leftists are deliberately blind to any charges even if in black and white...

because they are mostly hacks who couldn't care less about truth and justice, only about maintaining power... and keeping their supporters in Useful Idiot mode
 
Does hrc forfeit her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent if she rhetorically asks

What difference does it make?
 
leftists are deliberately blind to any charges even if in black and white...

because they are mostly hacks who couldn't care less about truth and justice, only about maintaining power... and keeping their supporters in Useful Idiot mode
The sweet thing is over 60% of independents want her to be put on trial. So keep covering for Hillary and lose a couple of election cycle or give her up. They cannot win without the independents.
 
Really? Can you show us Durham ever affirming this? Or accusing anyone in any of his findings of that crime?

Because I'm pretty sure that's just you making shit up again.


Treason isn't a generic catch all for whatever you don't like. Its the specific crime of waging war against the United States on behalf of a foreign power. Its only crime defined by the Constitution itself.

And Durham hasn't accused anyone of it. That's you....citing yourself as Durham.

Which obviously don't amount to much.
Well, according to my 25 years of military experience, anyone housing a private server and compromising Top Secret material has in fact committed treason. And thats not really what this investigation is even about, although I am sure Hildabeast has committed treason more than once.
 
Well, according to my 25 years of military experience, anyone housing a private server and compromising Top Secret material has in fact committed treason.

Treason is the only crime defined by the constitution. And here is how the constitution defines it:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. "

So where does it mention Email servers exactly? It doesn't sound like your 25 years of military experience amounts to much in analyzing the law. Maybe you fixed trucks or something.
 
I wonder if you have the slightest clue how special counsels work.
You do realize the Attorney General can fire a special council.

Who nominates the Attorney General? The President. President Hillary nominates someone who will fire Durham. The wimpy Republicans in the Senate fold as usual and confirm him/her.

The Attorney General fires Durham and the liberal media and Democrats cheer.
 
Treason is the only crime defined by the constitution. And here is how the constitution defines it:

"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. "

So where does it mention Email servers exactly? It doesn't sound like your 25 years of military experience amounts to much in analyzing the law. Maybe you fixed trucks or something.
The Constitution tells us about freedom. It tells us about federal taxes. It tells us what real money is. Yet we jettisoned these things, and they were mentioned.
 

Hillary Clinton dodges questions about Durham probe developments

Clinton ignores reporter's questions when confronted in NYC

15 Feb 2022 ~~ By Andrew Mark Miller
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton refused to answer questions as to whether or not her presidential campaign spied on former President Donald Trump.
"Did you pay to spy on the Trump campaign," Hillary was asked by a Daily Mail reporter in New York City on Tuesday. "When are you going to comment on the spying allegations, Hillary?"
Clinton declined to answer both questions as she simply waved at the reporter while continuing to walk inside a building.

Clinton's lack of comment comes after special counsel John Durham’s Feb. 11 filing alleging that lawyers from Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign in 2016 had paid to infiltrate servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an "inference" and "narrative" to bring to federal government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia.


Commentary:
Actually, Hillary is exercising her right to remain silent because anything she says can be used against her in a court of law. She also has the right to an attorney, just not one that's being indicted along with her.
Hmm..., I wonder if Hillary will choose a partner from Perkins Coie to represent her?
Obviously, Hillary hasn't been Emailed a storyline to use from the Central Committee as of yet, but they're working on it, I assure you.
My guess is that Hillary is calculating exactly how many campaign workers and State Dept., must “commit suicide”. Probably difficult arithmetic...
There's a lot of people involved in this act of sedition.
Tech guy 1, will never get another government contract, his business is ruined and he’s facing prison time. He’ll talk. Once the barrier is cracked there will be a flood of those willing to talk to follow.
It would be interesting to find out who tipped off the reporter that Hillary was going to visit Chelsea. Indeed, she didn't go there to talk politics.
Meanwhile, the only thing we're aware of is that Chelsea Hubbell-Mezvinsky has been running marathons recently instead of political office which tells me the Clinton “brand” in NY politics is polling really poorly. We may not see the next generation get elected.

Hillary belongs in handcuffs

 
le9k4l5ojii81.jpg

the statute of limitations has run out.
 
Well as much of a dirty evil bitch as she is that's standard operating procedure. Anytime you're involved in something that's an investigation or trial or whatever you don't say anything publicly as it can be used against you or tip off the opposing legal team.

Just because she didn't answer a question isn't indicative of anything. Any legal advisor regardless of the proceedings will tell you to keep quiet.
 

Forum List

Back
Top