Drudge is embarrassing himself by hyping up the Trump impeachment story...

[Slade3200]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

The latter is impossible to ignore, and the Hysterical House Dem impeachment silliness will only succeed in destroying what little chance they had to salvage something from 2020.

Yup ... all is lost if one follows the Democrat Socialist Party.

Then you should be supporting impeachment proceedings. Right?

I consider the political circus to be a waste of time and energy better spent making tomorrow even better for Americans than today. Our MSM needs this nothing burger to feed our unhinged not-too-brights and our Hysterical House Dems - afraid that a better tomorrow means more votes for Trump next year - are eager and willing to cooperate. They will do anything to damage this country.

Bill Maher doesn't even try to hide his disdain & disloyalty. Like many on the left he doesn't care who gets hurt as long as his mindless hatred is served:

Liberal Media Scream: Bill Maher cheers economic collapse if it dooms Trump
“I’ve been hoping for a recession — people hate me for it — but it would get rid of Trump, so you shouldn’t hate me for it.”
To which, Barro noted: “Recessions are really bad. People lose their jobs and their homes.”
Maher doubled down: “I know. It’s worth it.”

Oh come on. Was Trump any different than Maher? Did you hear the shit he said on the campaign trail and still says today? Every time he called our leaders stupid and having made bad deals and yada yada scorched earth yada.

It’s all the same rhetoric. None of it good

 

[skews13]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

It’s amazing watching the Magats swirling the toilet with their main turd like pieces of paper used to wipe his ass with.

Now that’s loyalty.

 

[Lesh]

Who's next?

Rush?

Trump is destroying the GOP

 

[Wry Catcher]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

The latter is impossible to ignore, and the Hysterical House Dem impeachment silliness will only succeed in destroying what little chance they had to salvage something from 2020.

Yup ... all is lost if one follows the Democrat Socialist Party.

Then you should be supporting impeachment proceedings. Right?

I consider the political circus to be a waste of time and energy better spent making tomorrow even better for Americans than today. Our MSM needs this nothing burger to feed our unhinged not-too-brights and our Hysterical House Dems - afraid that a better tomorrow means more votes for Trump next year - are eager and willing to cooperate. They will do anything to damage this country.

Bill Maher doesn't even try to hide his disdain & disloyalty. Like many on the left he doesn't care who gets hurt as long as his mindless hatred is served:

Liberal Media Scream: Bill Maher cheers economic collapse if it dooms Trump
“I’ve been hoping for a recession — people hate me for it — but it would get rid of Trump, so you shouldn’t hate me for it.”
To which, Barro noted: “Recessions are really bad. People lose their jobs and their homes.”
Maher doubled down: “I know. It’s worth it.”

Oh come on. Was Trump any different than Maher? Did you hear the shit he said on the campaign trail and still says today? Every time he called our leaders stupid and having made bad deals and yada yada scorched earth yada.

It’s all the same rhetoric. None of it good

Remember those doll toys advertised on TV, pull the string and and one of several short sentences popped out. That's Trump a man-child that is dummmmmb.

 

[iceberg]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

 

[Slade3200]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

 

[MAGAman]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

Drudge hasn't gone anywhere.

Hes always hyped both ways.

 

[lennypartiv]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

Fox news is doing the same thing. Is Murdoch still in control?
Giuliani was not working alone in Biden Ukraine probe

 

[iceberg]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Intel Community Secretly Nixed Whistleblower Demand Of First-Hand Info

 

[lennypartiv]

In my most humble opinion, the dumbest of the dumb supporters of trump will toss anyone, any idea, any fact under the bus which doesn't fit their narrative. The really believe trump is honest, truthful, a patriot, intelligent and moral - all of which defies reality.

Stupid Dems don't understand that loyalty is everything in politics.

 

[lennypartiv]

I have other sites I prefer over Drudge, I hadn't been there in a while.
I just went to their site now, they really are throwing Trump under the bus.

 

[Slade3200]

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Intel Community Secretly Nixed Whistleblower Demand Of First-Hand Info

Thanks for the link. Would love to know who changed the guidelines and why? Perhaps this whistlerblower initiated it? I don’t know. I think it’s a valid question but I don’t see a conspiracy here. The only thing this rule change did was give the whistleblower the ability to submit a report for the IG to review. It was the IG who deemed it of urgent concern. Remember the details of this report was kept under wraps until Trump released it. And the main issues involved in this situation are really focused on what Trump actually said on a phone call and what his lawyer was doing in Ukraine.

The rule change seems like a relatively insignificant side note. Are you seeing something there that I’m not?

 

[iceberg]

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Intel Community Secretly Nixed Whistleblower Demand Of First-Hand Info

Thanks for the link. Would love to know who changed the guidelines and why? Perhaps this whistlerblower initiated it? I don’t know. I think it’s a valid question but I don’t see a conspiracy here. The only thing this rule change did was give the whistleblower the ability to submit a report for the IG to review. It was the IG who deemed it of urgent concern. Remember the details of this report was kept under wraps until Trump released it. And the main issues involved in this situation are really focused on what Trump actually said on a phone call and what his lawyer was doing in Ukraine.

The rule change seems like a relatively insignificant side note. Are you seeing something there that I’m not?

we get "heresay" info that due to protections in our system, is not allowed.
we change our system to allow it
we go after the president
you see nothing to be alarmed about. you NEVER see anything done to trump to be alarmed about HOWEVER if it were to happen to the left, i'm 99.999% sure you'd be livid, yet now that a protection in our system is bypassed for the sole reason of attacking the president, you're like "well it's just to review it..." HOWEVER they were in full impeach mode before even SEEING said evidence (publicly) and no one raises an eyebrow.

kavanaugh was "Just to review it"
russia was "just to review it"
trumps lunch - just to review it.

the event itself schiff tweeted about a MONTH ago. the whistleblower said he had dirt, trump released said "dirt" and now you're saying TRUMP released it all as if it's now HIS fault he's being brought up for impeachment before it's even "reviewed"

and you see nothing wrong here. all they have then slade is HERESAY evidence bound by the sheer fact they had to allow it just to look at it FOR THIS AND ONLY THIS PURPOSE. this is fishing and making up your own god damn catch of the day.

the left is off in impeachment AGAIN over heresay and you're ok with this shit. our government is morphing in front of our eyes and every protection and separation of power we've ever known is tossed aside and you "see nothing of significant" note.

what is being done today is wrong and being done for the sole reason to attack a political opponent and you just don't give a flying horse shit. at this point there is zero to discuss with you because EVERY SINGLE FUCKING THING the left does that is bypassing our checks and balances is simply NOT significant to you.

cause...trump.

how fucked up a country do you really want to have that is so emotionally unstable you'll talk yourself into such bullshit?

just for grins, what law did the president break in that conversation? please cite it and how he broke it.

 

[Muhammed]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

He's probably always been a Democrat.
I think he's in the closet and doesn't want it to come out.

Oh....BTW, both his parents are DC Democrats.
So.....nuff said.


Yup.....he's fucking Gay.....:Matt Drudge - Wikipedia

Drudge previously lived in Hollywood. As of 2007, he owned two properties in Miami – a $1.4 million Mediterranean-style stucco house on Rivo Alto Island,[2] and a $1 million-plus condominium in Miami's Four Seasons hotel.[6] By early 2009, Drudge earned millions of dollars a year, traveled extensively and moved to another property in Miami and had become reclusive.[12] In 2003 he said his one indulgence, apart from travel, was his Corvette.[27]

He was listed on Out Magazine's Power List of the top 50 "list of gay men and women whose power and prestige is instrumental in influencing how we think about, and engage with, the world"[28] in 2011,[29] 2012,[30] and 2013.[28][31] Washington D.C. landscaper, David Cohen, alleged in the New York Daily News that he had a long-term relationship with Drudge.[32][33][34] Drudge specifically denied being homosexual in response to the Out Magazine article.[35]​

 

[mudwhistle]

I have other sites I prefer over Drudge, I hadn't been there in a while.
I just went to their site now, they really are throwing Trump under the bus.

The left has almost complete control of all sources of information.
This is how dictatorships are created.

 

[mudwhistle]

...methinks Drudge has gone over to the enemy.

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Used to be you had to witness wrongdoing.
Now all you need is gossup and rumors.

 

[Synthaholic]

Drudge has become a never Trumper. Probably didnt get credit he thought he deserved for getting Trump elected or his ego got bruised. All he hypes are anti Trump stories. He's become worse than CNN

 

[iceberg]

You’re right, presidential misconduct and impeachment is no big deal... we should just be focusing on how stupid the dems are, right?!

Come on, slade. You don't find it odd a month ago schiff tweeted about AL this?

That they changed whistleblower rules JUST BEFORE going after Trump?

To anyone without a dog in this race you'd scream SET UP..

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Used to be you had to witness wrongdoing.
Now all you need is gossup and rumors.

But he FEELZ Trump is sleeze so this is ok.

This only means I can change our laws and processes at will so I can go after 1 person.

What would we call other countries doing this?

Slade, if they did this to someone you love, still OK or do you call foul?

 

[Synthaholic]

But Drudge is the enemy now.

 

[Slade3200]

I think there is a lot of over politicalization going on but cut through the BS, I think it’s pretty clear what Trump was trying to do with that phone call and with Gulianis trip to Ukraine. I think it is an abuse of his power. I don’t think it rises to impeachment as I’d rather see him voted out of office. The people knew he was a sleezy businessman and they voted him in. He should get called out on all his BS but the right way to exit is from a vote.

Cut through the BS both ways.

You only do it one way usually. If the Don changed rules to go after someone, how would that sit with you? If he tweeted a month ago about a topic then a month later went OH NOs, what would you do or think?

And if impeachment is an overreaction, can we focus on the actions, not the people?

This is the first I’m hearing about changing whistlerblower rules. Can you explain a little more about that?

Intel Community Secretly Nixed Whistleblower Demand Of First-Hand Info

Thanks for the link. Would love to know who changed the guidelines and why? Perhaps this whistlerblower initiated it? I don’t know. I think it’s a valid question but I don’t see a conspiracy here. The only thing this rule change did was give the whistleblower the ability to submit a report for the IG to review. It was the IG who deemed it of urgent concern. Remember the details of this report was kept under wraps until Trump released it. And the main issues involved in this situation are really focused on what Trump actually said on a phone call and what his lawyer was doing in Ukraine.

The rule change seems like a relatively insignificant side note. Are you seeing something there that I’m not?

we get "heresay" info that due to protections in our system, is not allowed.
we change our system to allow it
we go after the president
you see nothing to be alarmed about. you NEVER see anything done to trump to be alarmed about HOWEVER if it were to happen to the left, i'm 99.999% sure you'd be livid, yet now that a protection in our system is bypassed for the sole reason of attacking the president, you're like "well it's just to review it..." HOWEVER they were in full impeach mode before even SEEING said evidence (publicly) and no one raises an eyebrow.

kavanaugh was "Just to review it"
russia was "just to review it"
trumps lunch - just to review it.

the event itself schiff tweeted about a MONTH ago. the whistleblower said he had dirt, trump released said "dirt" and now you're saying TRUMP released it all as if it's now HIS fault he's being brought up for impeachment before it's even "reviewed"

and you see nothing wrong here. all they have then slade is HERESAY evidence bound by the sheer fact they had to allow it just to look at it FOR THIS AND ONLY THIS PURPOSE. this is fishing and making up your own god damn catch of the day.

the left is off in impeachment AGAIN over heresay and you're ok with this shit. our government is morphing in front of our eyes and every protection and separation of power we've ever known is tossed aside and you "see nothing of significant" note.

what is being done today is wrong and being done for the sole reason to attack a political opponent and you just don't give a flying horse shit. at this point there is zero to discuss with you because EVERY SINGLE FUCKING THING the left does that is bypassing our checks and balances is simply NOT significant to you.

cause...trump.

how fucked up a country do you really want to have that is so emotionally unstable you'll talk yourself into such bullshit?

just for grins, what law did the president break in that conversation? please cite it and how he broke it.

Uhh no that’s not at all what I said. I actually said that it was a valid question. I didn’t say there was nothing there. But I didn’t point out that the controversy is more about they actual phone call than they heresay whistleblower report so I do t see how this factors in in a significant way.

Also a system wasn’t bypassed, it appears to have been legally changed. Perhaps it was changed because the whistlerblower had something to say and no avenue to voice his/her concerns, I don’t know. Like I said I’m open to a conversation about it. But I’m not seeing how it’s a conspiracy here.

I hope there was an avenue for anybody to report corruption and troubling things they learn in our government whether they see it first hand or hear about it. Not saying hearsay should carry as much weight but as second hand but there should be the ability to voice concerns. Wouldn’t you agree?