Why are you sticking up for a "science" guy who doesn't know the difference between an approved test and an unapproved, fraudulent test. He's even forgotten that he said a cycle threshold of 40 will give meaningless results. We know he forgot because he didn't say anything when everyone was using a cycle threshold of 40+, which we all know has spit out meaningless results.Fauci is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which has provided grants for medical studies using the dogs as test subjects. But the NIAID denied funding one particular project in which sedated beagles had their heads placed in mesh cages so sand flies could bite them.
In a July 30 “exposé,” the White Coat Waste Project alleged that Fauci, chief medical adviser to the president and head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, spent more than $424,000 on “beagle experiments” in which the dogs were “bitten to death by flies.”
That was followed by an Aug. 31 blog post that carried the headline “Fauci Funded $375K Beagle Torture Overseas, Too.”
Then, in an Oct. 5 report, the group added that “Fauci Wasted $1M+ to Poison Beagle Puppies, Cut Out Vocal Cords.”
So far there has no proof that Dr. Fauci had any knowledge of mistreatment of animals in any study. Further, the NIH, said, "Dr Fauci does not approve any individual grants. The NIH does fund medical research projects that includes animals in research but the NIH carefully monitors these projects for inhumane treatment and to insure that federal guidelines on use of animals in medical research are adhered to."
Answering Questions About #BeagleGate - FactCheck.org
Q: Did Dr. Anthony Fauci fund experiments on beagles? A: Fauci is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which has provided grants for medical studies using the dogs as test subjects. But the NIAID denied funding one particular project in which sedated beagles...www.factcheck.org
You are obviously triggered enough to keep replying, kid. I've thrown myself on no sword. I just said "snopes is for dopes" and your vagina has been constantly bleeding over it for days now. Tampon?
You do realise that the higher number of tests are generally used to detect a virus in a batch sample I suppose?
Flu season has hit which is adding to the problems caused by Covid
Dr. Fauci Admits That Covid Vaccines May Actually Make People 'Worse': "It Would Not Be The First Time"
Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down with "Meta" CEO Mark Zuckerberg and finally said out loud what many people have been warning for over a year about the rushed mRNA vaccines: They may actually make the Covid pandemic worse. Dr. Fauci was commenting on a recent study that showed that the Covid vaccines...trendingpolitics.com
Dr. Fauci was commenting on a recent study that showed that the Covid vaccines may actually make a recipient more likely to be reinfected than someone with natural immunity from a prior infection.
“This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse,” Fauci said. “There was the history of the Respiratory Syncitial Virus vaccine in children, which paradoxically made the children worse.”
Dr. Fauci wasn’t done yet, though. He went on to state another example that he was directly involved with where a treatment made individuals worse.
“One of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected,” Fauci added.
Simply because most of the attacks on Fauci are based on fake news such as the one that is the subject of this tread. And when that one was exposed, another attack was launch based on more fake news, followed by a third.
I see.
You provide a from link from reputable source and I will address it. Otherwise it's just false news.
I’m not a conservative.
Arguments for and against Fauci have been political since the first cases appeared in the US.
No it’s not political. You’ve made it political. Since Fauci opposed dumb Don, you support lying Fauci. It’s as simple as the enemy of my enemy is my friend.Arguments for and against Fauci have been political since the first cases appeared in the US.
Feb. 10: Trump, at a political rally, says the coronavirus will be gone by April when the weather gets warmer, but doesn't offer scientific explanation.
Feb. 16: Fauci says on CBS' "Face the Nation" that "it would be a stretch to assume that it's going to disappear with the warm weather."
March 20: At a White House coronavirus press briefing, Fauci downplays Trump's declaration of the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine as a "game changer" and states the potential benefits of the drug was "anecdotal evidence."
Trump, who had been standing behind Fauci, then stepped forward to clarify: "We'll see. We're going to know soon."
March 22: Fauci says he can't "jump in front" of Trump when he gives misinformation.
March 24: Trump states he wants states open by April 12, but Fauci cautions him to "be flexible."
April 5: Trump and Fauci again tout different messages regarding hydroxychloroquine.
April 12: Fauci says on CNN that earlier efforts to stop the spread of COVID-19 "obviously” could have saved lives but top health officials faced “a lot of pushback about shutting things down.”
Ect, Etc,......
The bottom line is Fauci was all about science and Trump was all about politics. From the very beginning of the pandemic, every statement Trump made was political with the November election in mind. Fauci began to oppose Trump when those statements had no scientific basis. If Trump would have checked with Fauci, his medical advisor to see that his statements were based on sound scientific evidence, there would have been no problem. Of course, that's not Trump. He makes statements to grab headline, not to state facts. It's no wonder republicans hate Facui's guts and will say anything to discredit him.
Here's a timeline of President Donald Trump's and Dr. Anthony Fauci's relationship
Over the course of the coronavirus’ spread, President Trump’s relationship with Dr. Anthony Fauci has seemingly vacillated from support to disdain.www.usatoday.com
The public, the media, and congress, all demand information about Covid from the CDC and the NIH. Fauci has said time after time, we just don't know yet and preliminary evidence indicates ..., or best data we have at this time, etc. In other words he qualifies his statements because he often doesn't not have sold data yet he has to provide guidance. In March 2020 he told the publics not to wear masks because there was not sufficient data to show they were effective. A few weeks later he said, we need to wear masks because the data shows they are effective at preventing the spread of virus. This is normal for a pandemic caused by a new virus.
Delusional.
If you have a link I will be happy to discuss it.
Lol
If all you can do is come up insults, there not much to discuss.
You don’t want a discussion. You’re just another winger.
You mean you stole the ballot box.
