Of course you don't ... Because all you want to do is fight with me ... And you suck at it.
At least I will try something different every now and again ...
You give yourself too much credit. I don’t want to fight with you. I just tend to confuse trolling with a genuine attempt at discussion. Or maybe I don’t understand your style.
I can say ... Stop making excuses for President Biden ... Did so many, many times.
We have a limited amount of facts available, so we are left with what we know and what the law says. We don’t know “intent” because that hasn’t been determined (Nor has it been in the case of Trump, which the OP was making a comparison to). We do know what the law says and it makes distinctions.
I have never said it shouldn’t be investigated or that it shouldn’t be taken seriously nor have I opposed a special counsel. That is the only way to have an investigation of a president that isn’t going to be political.
So talking the law (which you haven’t really disputed) and talking about how the law specifies intent (which you pretty much punted on) is making excuses? You are the one who seems to be insisting that unintentional acts are the same as intentional acts even though the law says otherwise.
You will then turn around and start making excuses for President Biden ...
Then try to tell me you think the whole thing is serious.
I’ve never said it wasn’t serious or that it shouldn’t be investigated. But feel free to keep on pretending it’s “the same” as the situation with Trump’s documents.
My first comment on this topic was to point out that it wasn’t the same, not that it wasn’t also serious.
At any rate, it’s pretty obvious to me you have no sincere desire for discussion.
I will ask you what you want or expect from our Public Officials ...
And you will literally tell me to stop telling you what you think.
Maybe you should be more straight forward in how you ask Instead of trying to make answering a challenge that puts off discussion?
I will clearly indicate my position on how serious I think it is to completely fail to respect and neglect our laws ...
And you somehow think you need to start making more excuses.
I clearly articulated my position. Yet you insist that it is the
exact same whether or not something was intentional.
It isn’t in terms of the law.
So why don’t wait for the results of an investigation before throwing around equivalencies?
....
I will tell you ... "You are not capable".
And you have yet to figure out what I mean ... So, I am going to give you a clue.
It's not as much my communication skills.
You are not capable of thinking outside that stupid little box ...
That continues to produce nothing more than the same old crusty Right-Left garbage you always spew ...
And will misinterpret whatever you can of what I post ... And do your best to turn everything into your garbage.
And you have no desire for honest communication.
And ... If the only way you can ever see the two of us communicating ... Is by fighting about everything you get wrong ...
You Better Buckle Up Buttercup ... I Am Not on the Staff and Don't Have to Take That Shit Out of You ...
.
I have no interest in fighting, life is too short to get emotionally engaged with an anonymous person on the internet who is convinced everything she says is right.
Try a little less arrogance sometime and learn what people really think instead of assuming.
I doubt you have any desire to, at least not with me.
