Publius1787
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2011
- 6,211
- 676
- 190
But none of them were collectivists.
When collectivists decided to hide their intentions, they coopted the term liberal and perverted it to it's current modern parlance.
EXACTLY right. I got a neg. rep and message from that moron JBeukema telling me to read Locke -as if that somehow proves Locke shared ANYTHING in common with modern liberals who are actually COLLECTIVISTS!
Sorry JBeukema that you are such an ignorant MORON but Locke was NOT a modern liberal, he was NOT a collectivist, he did NOT believe in the nanny state -and for any collectivist to think he can co-opt people like Locke, Montesquieu and Blackwood who were individualists and pretend they were all actually budding little Marxists is the continuation of the big deception of the left that started when they co-opted the word "liberal" in the first place trying to avoid being identified for what they really are -collectivists.
And because JBeukema feels free to slam people with neg reps while STILL being the liberal COWARD he is, proving he is totally incapable of actually defending himself in debate either publicly or personally, taking advantage of those who allow open access to leave personal comments, messages and rep but blocks it for himself -he is now on my ignore list. Go fuck yourself you stupid asshole. If you can't tell the difference between what Locke REALLY believed and what the collectivists calling themselves "liberals" actually believe -then go back to school because your ignorance surely poses a danger to yourself. Try a real school instead of that indoctrination center called "public school" you have proved you never even graduated from yet.
I will not allow gutless cowards like JBeukema to do a hit-and-run on me any more.
Read Locke. Then read Jefferson and the rest.
Not my fault you're retarded.
Cicero, Locke, Jefferson, and Madison are always welcome references in a debate such as this. They are the nails in the coffin that is this thread.
Last edited: