Don’t complain if you don’t receive your Social Security Check

No, the left wants to screw responsible people who planned for their own retirement, in favor of taking money from them and funneling it to people who did not, in order to openly buy votes.
The fuck are you talking about about?
 
Do you have tell lies to stay in the argument?

Its your side that cant define a woman
Well I’m looking down at a pecker and you keep telling me I’m female.

You seem to be the confused one as always
 
I hate waste, fraud and abuse

Why don’t you identify some before you fire people ?
/---/ For the same damn reason you don't. WE DON'T WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT. WE HAVE NO POWER TO DO THAT. HOW THE HELL ARE PRIVATE CITIZENS SUPPOSED TO IDENTIFY WASTE, FRAUD , ABUSE? Why are you being so obtuse?
 
/---/ For the same damn reason you don't. WE DON'T WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT. WE HAVE NO POWER TO DO THAT. HOW THE HELL ARE PRIVATE CITIZENS SUPPOSED TO IDENTIFY WASTE, FRAUD , ABUSE? Why are you being so obtuse?

Well Skippy….you are the one demanding people get fired to stop waste, fraud and abuse when none has actually been identified
 
For all the sturm and drang about “dead people on the social security rolls”… there has been no accounting of how many of them actually draw any benefits.

Know why? Because they don’t.

Nor to my understanding thousands of indictments to arrest all these people.

(A one off here and there which is normal and has been happening for years, but not sudden uptick of thousands.)

WW
 
There is little chance for retired people to commit fraud. You work 30 years, reach 62, put in for SS and you get it.
When someone dies, SS is notified when a Death Certificate is issued and payments stop.

The REAL FRAUD is in Social Security Disability.
Fake claims, the person gets better, they are not seriously disabled.

Want to stop that. Hire more SS investigators.
Trump is firing them

Nah man, the REAL money is Medicare/Medicaid fraud.

Ask Senator Rick Scott (R-FL) how the scams work, he can share all the dirty.

WW
 
Last edited:
Well I’m looking down at a pecker and you keep telling me I’m female.

You seem to be the confused one as always
This is the internet where libs can be anything they want today, and something else tomorrow if they choose

If you say you are a man I wont argue with you

But your posts often convey a different message
 
/----/ Libtard outrage.
1742732783524.webp
 
/----/ There is plenty of evidence. You really don't want to admit it.
Waste is in the eye of the beholder

What may be waste to a conservative may be a wise expenditure to a liberal

What may be waste to a billionaire may be badly needed by someone struggling to feed their family.

None of the “waste” you identified could be fixed by firing people
 
Can’t make this stuff up

Trumps Commerce Secretary says only fraudsters would complain if their Social Security check doesn’t come.
Most would just say….Doesn’t matter, they will send two next month

Shows how clueless they are.


The commerce secretary Lutnick probably has a net worth of between $2 billion to $4 billion, according to various sources.

I'm sure if his 95 year old mother-in-law didn't get her check, and needed a few bucks to tide her over until the next months check, he could afford to just give her the money.

But not every senior has a billionaire son-in-law, and not getting a check, means not having money for groceries, or rent, or utilities.
 
I didn't say ANYTHING about planned benefit cuts as a change to SS Retirement.

I was addressing when the Trust Fund is exhausted and not longer able to supplement current revenues. Once the Trust Fund is exhausted benefits WILL be cut by 25%. Currently that will happen circa 2034. If SS benefits become "tax free" the Trust will be exhausted sooner.

Basic math.

(Assuming no other action to make-up the shortfall between revenues collected and benefits paid.)

WW
I would love to hear how this works if you can fictionalize a response for me. Income tax on SS will have no impact on the SS funding.
 
No, the left wants to screw responsible people who planned for their own retirement, in favor of taking money from them and funneling it to people who did not, in order to openly buy votes.
I won't buy you a clue, but i'll rent one to you.
It's like the ant and the grasshopper.
To solve the problem, FDR created social security, which became a forced retirement system, so whether you planned well, or you fiddled away your summer, you had a safe secure adequate retirement.
 
I would love to hear how this works if you can fictionalize a response for me. Income tax on SS will have no impact on the SS funding.

Income tax gives the federal government additional funding with which they can pay social security.
Remember, the federal government reimburses all those social security IOU's from the general fund.
 
Trump and Musk are looking for lib scam artists who are defrauding SS and Medicare, along with Medicaid

The left is worried about losing their criminal gravytrain
I bet you think Jesus is a good MAGAT
 
This is the internet where libs can be anything they want today, and something else tomorrow if they choose

If you say you are a man I wont argue with you

But your posts often convey a different message
Is it activating yer female instincts?
 
/—-/ Tax on SS is just a reduction in benefits. Why would you want less when you retire?
That's true, but he is saying it will reduce the trust fund. I pay no taxes on my SS anyway.

That would have no impact on my contributions to the trust fund. He is confused, just like about SSDI not being funded by the SS Trust Fund, as SSI is funded by general tax revenue.
 
/—-/ Tax on SS is just a reduction in benefits. Why would you want less when you retire?
Except if you're only getting social security, you probably don't make enough to have to pay federal income taxes.
Of course if you have a 401-k, and another pension, you make enough to pay income tax.

It was similar to the law Ronald Reagan signed where your social security benefits were reduced if you received a federal pension.
 
Back
Top Bottom