Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
no infringement on our rights is modest or reasonable.When one side takes an extreme position, the other side often does the same in response. In the aftermath of the Parkland shooting, the gun lobby's refusal to support sensible, modest measures like raising the age for rifles to 21 and universal background checks has pushed some on the left to call for repealing the Second Amendment.
The anti-gun lobby's reaction has been just as extreme: They are placing 99% of the blame on guns, guns, guns, and are virtually ignoring the repeated and egregious failures of the local police, not to mention the failure of the FBI, the failure of the legal guardian, the misguided program that encouraged the police not to arrest teens for actions that would normally warrant arrest, and the cop at the school who refused to engage the shooter.
and the left has mocked every other reasonable option.
down with or rights or nothing, that's their stance.
drinking beer or fostering kids isn't a right.no infringement on our rights is modest or reasonable.When one side takes an extreme position, the other side often does the same in response. In the aftermath of the Parkland shooting, the gun lobby's refusal to support sensible, modest measures like raising the age for rifles to 21 and universal background checks has pushed some on the left to call for repealing the Second Amendment.
The anti-gun lobby's reaction has been just as extreme: They are placing 99% of the blame on guns, guns, guns, and are virtually ignoring the repeated and egregious failures of the local police, not to mention the failure of the FBI, the failure of the legal guardian, the misguided program that encouraged the police not to arrest teens for actions that would normally warrant arrest, and the cop at the school who refused to engage the shooter.
and the left has mocked every other reasonable option.
down with or rights or nothing, that's their stance.
It's not an infringement to have to wait till you're 21 to buy a rifle. We make teens wait till their 21 to buy beer; we can certainly make them wait to buy rifles. Nor is it an infringement to require that anyone who buys a gun undergo a background check. If you want to work as a daycare worker, you undergo a background check--no rights infringed. If you want to be a foster parent or host an exchange student, you undergo a background check--no rights infringed there either.
He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
I'm on the left. You don't get any more liberal than me. And that's not my goal. I want some guns restricted. Some guns prohibited. That has nothing to do with repealing the 2nd amendment.He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
your stance is unconstitutional and therefore unreasonable.I'm on the left. You don't get any more liberal than me. And that's not my goal. I want some guns restricted. Some guns prohibited. That has nothing to do with repealing the 2nd amendment.He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
When are you fuckers going to get a rational argument on this issue?
What's unconstitutional? You still have the right to bear arms. You just can't bear some of them.your stance is unconstitutional and therefore unreasonable.
shall not be infringedWhat's unconstitutional? You still have the right to bear arms. You just can't bear some of them.your stance is unconstitutional and therefore unreasonable.
He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
Trump didn't do it. Trump even decided that it was better to ignore the 2A, until someone told him that all these nutters who support him think their gun is an extension of their penis and love their guns more than their own family.
The number of school shootings, and other shootings, has brought the issue to the fore.
You're not infringed, you can still bear arms. You just got no business, as a civilian, owning a weapons designed for war. It is illegal for you to start a war, so why have a weapon of war? You think you should be able to own an F-16? How about a Cobra gun ship? Does the 2nd amendment allow you to buy one of those?shall not be infringed
you don't get pick and choose our rights, that's why we have the Constitution, to keep people, like you, from voting them away.
You're not infringed, you can still bear arms. You just got no business, as a civilian, owning a weapons designed for war. It is illegal for you to start a war, so why have a weapon of war? You think you should be able to own an F-16? How about a Cobra gun ship? Does the 2nd amendment allow you to buy one of those?shall not be infringed
you don't get pick and choose our rights, that's why we have the Constitution, to keep people, like you, from voting them away.
do you have a link of them, as a group, actually stating they want to repeal it?
a former scotus isn't the dnc and not enough of a leader
Especially since that former SC judge is a republican.
He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
It is not my goal.
Next.
You're not infringed, you can still bear arms. You just got no business, as a civilian, owning a weapons designed for war. It is illegal for you to start a war, so why have a weapon of war? You think you should be able to own an F-16? How about a Cobra gun ship? Does the 2nd amendment allow you to buy one of those?shall not be infringed
you don't get pick and choose our rights, that's why we have the Constitution, to keep people, like you, from voting them away.
What's unconstitutional? You still have the right to bear arms. You just can't bear some of them.your stance is unconstitutional and therefore unreasonable.
not allowing someone to buy a product is CLEARLY an infringement.
Two Thumbs, post: 19623052,not allowing someone to buy a product is CLEARLY an infringement.
You are not allowed to by auto-matic firearms.
He has made the left admit word for word that repealing the second amendment is there goal. Donald Trump si the greatest President in history.
It is not my goal.
Next.
It is what you are fighting for though since you are in lock step with people who are
do you have a link of them, as a group, actually stating they want to repeal it?
a former scotus isn't the dnc and not enough of a leader
Especially since that former SC judge is a republican.
Seriously? You believe John Paul Stevens is a Republican? I didn't think I could think you were any dumber than I thought before. I stand corrected.
JPS is a Republican. Wow, that's classic
Also, you're lying. You're implying that if we ban semi-automatics you'll be happy and become a second amendment supporter. Actually, you'll move on to the next thing to ban.
