Denialism isn't a theory, AGW is.
You're right. Denialism isn't disprovable, therefore it's not a theory. It's just a relgious belief.
Hotter...AGW
Colder...AGW
Wetter...AGW
Drier...AGW
Don't be silly. Global warming means warming, not cooling. Why do so many deniers say that warming means cooling?
You can see why we're suspicious when this is given as the reason we should spend trillions on less reliable, "Green Energy".
I can see you're not stating our position honestly, or talking about green energy honestly, meaning there's little reason to pay attention to you.
When you guys get your story straight and push for more nuclear energy as the solution to too much CO2, get back to me and we can talk.
So that's the logic fallacy you're using to run now?
Nuclear energy fails on an economic level, and is beaten on an economic level by renewables. Opposing it in favor of renewables is in no way inconsistent with supporting global warming theory. You being ignorant of the science and economics only make you look bad, not us.