Trump has put forward many lawful defenses. The problem is that one such defense, actually implicates him in another crime. And the defense of that crime, implicates him in yet another crime.
That's how it works in a common court of law in which justice is determined on the merits of the case. Furhman did find that glove but I don't believe had custody of any of the blood samples at any time. But when subsequently questioned he took the 5th three times that never helps the case for the prosecution.
That's how it works in a common court of law in which justice is determined on the merits of the case. Furhman did find that glove but I don't believe had custody of any of the blood samples at any time. But when subsequently questioned he took the 5th three times that never helps the case for the prosecution.
Nevertheless the defense was able to plant the suggestion that the police either mishandled the blood samples or deliberately placed them strategically. There was no evidence presented of that but O J Simpson fans will forever believe that happened. After watching most of the trial before the jury went out to deliberate, I bet my boss a steak dinner that O J would be acquitted. He took the bet. He bought me a steak dinner.
And here we are dealing with a politicized and weaponized DOJ. And it will pull every string at its disposal to ensure Trump will have a hostile judge and jury. And the evidence they will say is irrefutable and it is anybody's guess if anybody deciding his guilt will care that the evidence is suspect.
This is where your argument goes into the crapper.
You got BJ in your name
so what
As you have "Gerbil" in yours.I was just mentioning you have "BJ" in your name
Yet Trump couldn't show them to the biographer.
The DOJ can force the judge out of the case if they choose to do that, and you can be sure they'll do everything in their power to impanel a jury as hostile to Trump as they can get.
Not to mention Trump refuted that claim to the biographer, that was recorded at Bedminster.We will see about that in court
Remember, the judge that Trump appointed oversees jury selection. She gets the final word on who's on the jury.
Nothing Trump says can be considered "fact".
Trump was busy breaking the law.We are all busy, right? Too busy is an excuse.
A trail will determine if that excuse holds water.
Fox News has released a preview clip of anchor Bret Baier’s interview with Donald Trump, the former president’s first sit down since he was indicted last week on federal charges related to his withholding of classified documents.
According to the clip (watch it below), Trump offered another explanation for why he didn’t just return the classified material, even in response to a subpoena: He was too busy to sort through the boxes where they were kept.
Donald Trump Talks Ballot-Stuffing With Fox News’ Bret Baier, Who Then Says, “You Lost The 2020 Election”
UPDATE: Donald Trump offered a fusillade of unfounded claims and falsehoods in his interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier, who seems to have gone into the sit down with a strategy to challenge the former president on certain topics and move on at other moments. “Why did you have this very sensitive...www.yahoo.com
