Dont vote for ineffective Democrats; vote for none of the above.
The Democratic Party spits with impunity upon liberals and lefties and populists; they acquiesce and surrender to conservatives. Theyre much less able to accomplish anything sustainable.
I hear and read of Tea Partys taking control of the Republican Party insures conservatives future inability to occupy the White House or gain control of both congressional chambers.
I m a populist opposed to trickle down economic theorists. I gauge political partys national political effectiveness by their ability to influence our nation's political policies and I live in a blue congressional district of a blue state.
All parties are more effective when they occupy elected offices and less effective when they lose political elections. But unlike Democrats, Republicans and particularly the Tea Party are recently and currently much less ineffective when they are not in power.
I attribute this to the Tea Partys strategic outlook, they of course want to be elected but their primary goal is exert maximum influence upon our nations political policies. Tea Partiests wont hesitate to cripple Republicans who hinder Tea Party goals.
Republicans have greater fear and more respect for the ability and willingness of Tea Party to seek retribution for anything undermining or even lesser adherence to conservatism. Republicans believe within safer election districts they need only fight general election skirmishes; but if they fail to respect the Tea Party they evoke all out take-no-prisoners primary wars.
Those more on the left of the political spectrum, (e.g. liberals or populists) have not profited from the Tea Partys examples and thus they can be disrespected or ignored by the remainder of the Democratic Party. I cannot recall a single significant Clinton administration's economic or social accomplishment that has not been undone by the following Republican administrations.
I live in a blue state. A Democratic candidate not additionally listed on the ballot as a more liberal third party candidate cannot gain my vote.
I do not share the Green Partys political priorities but I am not generally opposed to their platform and vote for their candidates.
I regret that my state does not profit from Nevadas example. Nevada voters can demonstrate rejection of all of an office's candidates listed upon the ballot by indicating their votes are for none of (the) above. Rather than my prior practice of not voting within many general elections, I intend to commence entering NOA as a write in candidate within general elections lacking any appropriate candidates on the ballots.
Respectfully, Supposn
The Democratic Party spits with impunity upon liberals and lefties and populists; they acquiesce and surrender to conservatives. Theyre much less able to accomplish anything sustainable.
I hear and read of Tea Partys taking control of the Republican Party insures conservatives future inability to occupy the White House or gain control of both congressional chambers.
I m a populist opposed to trickle down economic theorists. I gauge political partys national political effectiveness by their ability to influence our nation's political policies and I live in a blue congressional district of a blue state.
All parties are more effective when they occupy elected offices and less effective when they lose political elections. But unlike Democrats, Republicans and particularly the Tea Party are recently and currently much less ineffective when they are not in power.
I attribute this to the Tea Partys strategic outlook, they of course want to be elected but their primary goal is exert maximum influence upon our nations political policies. Tea Partiests wont hesitate to cripple Republicans who hinder Tea Party goals.
Republicans have greater fear and more respect for the ability and willingness of Tea Party to seek retribution for anything undermining or even lesser adherence to conservatism. Republicans believe within safer election districts they need only fight general election skirmishes; but if they fail to respect the Tea Party they evoke all out take-no-prisoners primary wars.
Those more on the left of the political spectrum, (e.g. liberals or populists) have not profited from the Tea Partys examples and thus they can be disrespected or ignored by the remainder of the Democratic Party. I cannot recall a single significant Clinton administration's economic or social accomplishment that has not been undone by the following Republican administrations.
I live in a blue state. A Democratic candidate not additionally listed on the ballot as a more liberal third party candidate cannot gain my vote.
I do not share the Green Partys political priorities but I am not generally opposed to their platform and vote for their candidates.
I regret that my state does not profit from Nevadas example. Nevada voters can demonstrate rejection of all of an office's candidates listed upon the ballot by indicating their votes are for none of (the) above. Rather than my prior practice of not voting within many general elections, I intend to commence entering NOA as a write in candidate within general elections lacking any appropriate candidates on the ballots.
Respectfully, Supposn
