Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

Is the USA the only nation with demand? According to your "Theory" China and India should have economies 4 times that of the USA

Is this a serious question?

Oh it's Frank.

Nope, it's not serious.

So the Chinese and Indians don't demand?

Sucks when your stupid theory hits the iceberg.

I said that? Weird, I don't remember saying that.

Yet you had an entire argument based upon something I didn't say.

They should really invent a term for that.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

Is the USA the only nation with demand? According to your "Theory" China and India should have economies 4 times that of the USA

Is this a serious question?

Oh it's Frank.

Nope, it's not serious.

So the Chinese and Indians don't demand?

Sucks when your stupid theory hits the iceberg.

According to libturd parasite economic theory, if someone buys a product, that proves there was demand for the product. It would be impossible for someone to create a product and sell it for which there was no demand because the fact that it sells is proof that there was demand.

The libturd theory of job creation is non-falsifiable. There is no way to prove it wrong. It's a matter of faith, not science or logic.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.

So who are these people that don't have jobs that are the source of all this demand that creates jobs?

Simple ideas are better than moronic wrong ideas.

Furthermore, what idea could be more simple or wrong than the claim that demand creates jobs?
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.
Se the problem is people here take you seriously enough to respond to your crap posts. But snce you are a) ignorant as shit, and b) dishonest as all get out there is no point in engaging you. You either lie, claim someone said something they never said, or make inane statements unsupported by any evidence.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.

So who are these people that don't have jobs that are the source of all this demand that creates jobs?

Simple ideas are better than moronic wrong ideas.

Furthermore, what idea could be more simple or wrong than the claim that demand creates jobs?
Actually he wrote that poor people have jobs but no demand. I guess they live on air.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.

So who are these people that don't have jobs that are the source of all this demand that creates jobs?

Simple ideas are better than moronic wrong ideas.

Furthermore, what idea could be more simple or wrong than the claim that demand creates jobs?
Actually he wrote that poor people have jobs but no demand. I guess they live on air.

So where does all this demand come from? Doesn't he also claim there is no middle class?
 
Outstanding!

I'm going to close my business tomorrow and go into hair ball production. I'm going to hire an advertising firm and lease warehouse space. I will then hire 5 people to collect pet hair from people living in our county.

I will then hire three more people to roll the hair into little balls...as well as a sales and administrative staff.

By the time I'm done risking everything I own, I'll be making millions selling hair balls to the new market I created with all of my capital!

It's genius!!!
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.

So who are these people that don't have jobs that are the source of all this demand that creates jobs?

Simple ideas are better than moronic wrong ideas.

Furthermore, what idea could be more simple or wrong than the claim that demand creates jobs?

Demand does create jobs. Show me a product that no one wanted yet still sold and turned a profit.

Innovation can spur demand, but demand always drives success/growth.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.
Se the problem is people here take you seriously enough to respond to your crap posts. But snce you are a) ignorant as shit, and b) dishonest as all get out there is no point in engaging you. You either lie, claim someone said something they never said, or make inane statements unsupported by any evidence.

You really should get back to driving that "business" of yours in to the ground.

Run along little boy.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.

So who are these people that don't have jobs that are the source of all this demand that creates jobs?

Simple ideas are better than moronic wrong ideas.

Furthermore, what idea could be more simple or wrong than the claim that demand creates jobs?
Actually he wrote that poor people have jobs but no demand. I guess they live on air.

So where does all this demand come from? Doesn't he also claim there is no middle class?

Yup, thats what I said...I said there is no middle class.

Please tell me what else I said, it's fascinating.
 
Outstanding!

I'm going to close my business tomorrow and go into hair ball production. I'm going to hire an advertising firm and lease warehouse space. I will then hire 5 people to collect pet hair from people living in our county.

I will then hire three more people to roll the hair into little balls...as well as a sales and administrative staff.

By the time I'm done risking everything I own, I'll be making millions selling hair balls to the new market I created with all of my capital!

It's genius!!!

You've got it! That's all you need. Money and any idea. It doesn't matter if there is a consumer demand for the product. You are "creating" jobs!!!!
 
Can you imagine one of these nitwits going into the bank to borrow some money to start their business.


BANKER: Well Mr Ice Weasel, what kind of business do you want to start?
Mr IW. Want to start a widget business. I need 100 thousand dollars.
Bankeer: Widgets?
Mr. IW, Yep, widgets, I invented the widget.
Banker: Have you sold a lot of widgets in the past?
Mr. IW; Nope. Just now getting ready to make them. That's why I need the money.
Banker: Have you done any studies to see if people want widgets? Is there a demand for your widget?
Mr IW, Nope don't need to. I already know that market. There isn't one. Yet.
Banker; Have you pre sold, have any orders for or any other forms of projected sales?
Mr IW, Nope, don't need to. IF I BUILD THEM WIDGETS, THEY WILL COME. Says so in the scriptures.;

Banker; No thanks Mr IW.
The end.
I've been in business for 28 years, Slick. I asked about you so the answer is obvious.

Your scenario is stupid. If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it. You would go to an investor(s) not a banker for a loan. Your pizza delivery job didn't teach you that?



You axd me wat? Slick?

My little "banking conversation " is what you idiots sound like. Then when you realize how ******* stupid you all have been and you want to start changing what I wrote. For instance;
you wrote; If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it"

What you wrote goes to two things; I had written that you alleged to have invented the widget. Which means it now exists as your invention.

Secondly; what you have inadvertently admitted is that no one brings a product to market without understanding if there is a demand for that product.

WHICH IS ******* EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES HAVE BEEN SAYING.

Thank you.

As to borrowing 100k from an "investor" You can't be so stupid that you didn't know that banks make business loans. Please tell me you are not that dumb. If you are that stupid, I can't talk to you no more.
 
Can you imagine one of these nitwits going into the bank to borrow some money to start their business.


BANKER: Well Mr Ice Weasel, what kind of business do you want to start?
Mr IW. Want to start a widget business. I need 100 thousand dollars.
Bankeer: Widgets?
Mr. IW, Yep, widgets, I invented the widget.
Banker: Have you sold a lot of widgets in the past?
Mr. IW; Nope. Just now getting ready to make them. That's why I need the money.
Banker: Have you done any studies to see if people want widgets? Is there a demand for your widget?
Mr IW, Nope don't need to. I already know that market. There isn't one. Yet.
Banker; Have you pre sold, have any orders for or any other forms of projected sales?
Mr IW, Nope, don't need to. IF I BUILD THEM WIDGETS, THEY WILL COME. Says so in the scriptures.;

Banker; No thanks Mr IW.
The end.
I've been in business for 28 years, Slick. I asked about you so the answer is obvious.

Your scenario is stupid. If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it. You would go to an investor(s) not a banker for a loan. Your pizza delivery job didn't teach you that?



You axd me wat? Slick?

My little "banking conversation " is what you idiots sound like. Then when you realize how ******* stupid you all have been and you want to start changing what I wrote. For instance;
you wrote; If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it"

What you wrote goes to two things; I had written that you alleged to have invented the widget. Which means it now exists as your invention.

Secondly; what you have inadvertently admitted is that no one brings a product to market without understanding if there is a demand for that product.

WHICH IS ******* EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES HAVE BEEN SAYING.

Thank you.

As to borrowing 100k from an "investor" You can't be so stupid that you didn't know that banks make business loans. Please tell me you are not that dumb. If you are that stupid, I can't talk to you no more.
LOL. Lots of emotion there, all hat no cattle. Banks do make loans but it's difficult these days. You'd need an investor or more if you need to raise big capital.

There is no demand for something that doesn't exist. The demand is created when people see it and want it. You calling someone stupid is funny.
 
Because she's right. Businesses don't "create jobs". They answer the need for jobs that is created by consumer demand. It's that demand that creates jobs. Businesses are just there to fulfill the demand.

Ultimately it's a healthy middle class that creates jobs.

By "healthy middle class" you mean people with jobs. By "demand" you mean people with jobs. In other words, you have simply restated the inane libturd theory that jobs create jobs.

Take another spin in the libturd wheel of circular logic.

Jobs don't create jobs. Poor people have jobs, but they don't drive the economy. Want to try again?

But then again you're a simple person with simple ideas.
Se the problem is people here take you seriously enough to respond to your crap posts. But snce you are a) ignorant as shit, and b) dishonest as all get out there is no point in engaging you. You either lie, claim someone said something they never said, or make inane statements unsupported by any evidence.

You really should get back to driving that "business" of yours in to the ground.

Run along little boy.
Eat shit, asshole.
You're gone.
 
15th post
Can you imagine one of these nitwits going into the bank to borrow some money to start their business.


BANKER: Well Mr Ice Weasel, what kind of business do you want to start?
Mr IW. Want to start a widget business. I need 100 thousand dollars.
Bankeer: Widgets?
Mr. IW, Yep, widgets, I invented the widget.
Banker: Have you sold a lot of widgets in the past?
Mr. IW; Nope. Just now getting ready to make them. That's why I need the money.
Banker: Have you done any studies to see if people want widgets? Is there a demand for your widget?
Mr IW, Nope don't need to. I already know that market. There isn't one. Yet.
Banker; Have you pre sold, have any orders for or any other forms of projected sales?
Mr IW, Nope, don't need to. IF I BUILD THEM WIDGETS, THEY WILL COME. Says so in the scriptures.;

Banker; No thanks Mr IW.
The end.
I've been in business for 28 years, Slick. I asked about you so the answer is obvious.

Your scenario is stupid. If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it. You would go to an investor(s) not a banker for a loan. Your pizza delivery job didn't teach you that?



You axd me wat? Slick?

My little "banking conversation " is what you idiots sound like. Then when you realize how ******* stupid you all have been and you want to start changing what I wrote. For instance;
you wrote; If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it"

What you wrote goes to two things; I had written that you alleged to have invented the widget. Which means it now exists as your invention.

Secondly; what you have inadvertently admitted is that no one brings a product to market without understanding if there is a demand for that product.

WHICH IS ******* EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES HAVE BEEN SAYING.

Thank you.

As to borrowing 100k from an "investor" You can't be so stupid that you didn't know that banks make business loans. Please tell me you are not that dumb. If you are that stupid, I can't talk to you no more.
LOL. Lots of emotion there, all hat no cattle. Banks do make loans but it's difficult these days. You'd need an investor or more if you need to raise big capital.

There is no demand for something that doesn't exist. The demand is created when people see it and want it. You calling someone stupid is funny.
Zeke singlehandedly created mass demand for Blatz Beer.
 
Can you imagine one of these nitwits going into the bank to borrow some money to start their business.


BANKER: Well Mr Ice Weasel, what kind of business do you want to start?
Mr IW. Want to start a widget business. I need 100 thousand dollars.
Bankeer: Widgets?
Mr. IW, Yep, widgets, I invented the widget.
Banker: Have you sold a lot of widgets in the past?
Mr. IW; Nope. Just now getting ready to make them. That's why I need the money.
Banker: Have you done any studies to see if people want widgets? Is there a demand for your widget?
Mr IW, Nope don't need to. I already know that market. There isn't one. Yet.
Banker; Have you pre sold, have any orders for or any other forms of projected sales?
Mr IW, Nope, don't need to. IF I BUILD THEM WIDGETS, THEY WILL COME. Says so in the scriptures.;

Banker; No thanks Mr IW.
The end.
I've been in business for 28 years, Slick. I asked about you so the answer is obvious.

Your scenario is stupid. If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it. You would go to an investor(s) not a banker for a loan. Your pizza delivery job didn't teach you that?



You axd me wat? Slick?

My little "banking conversation " is what you idiots sound like. Then when you realize how ******* stupid you all have been and you want to start changing what I wrote. For instance;
you wrote; If no such widget existed it would be impossible to demonstrate the demand for it"

What you wrote goes to two things; I had written that you alleged to have invented the widget. Which means it now exists as your invention.

Secondly; what you have inadvertently admitted is that no one brings a product to market without understanding if there is a demand for that product.

WHICH IS ******* EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU AND YOUR BUDDIES HAVE BEEN SAYING.

Thank you.

As to borrowing 100k from an "investor" You can't be so stupid that you didn't know that banks make business loans. Please tell me you are not that dumb. If you are that stupid, I can't talk to you no more.
LOL. Lots of emotion there, all hat no cattle. Banks do make loans but it's difficult these days. You'd need an investor or more if you need to raise big capital.

There is no demand for something that doesn't exist. The demand is created when people see it and want it. You calling someone stupid is funny.

You are stating OUR position and don't even realize it. DEMAND is the necessary component. You've said it yourself repeatedly.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom