Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

.

The only time I've ever seen the term "total capital' used was as a measure of a bank's financial health.

What in the world does this have to do with the thread?

Total capital is used to measure the health of any business.
No, actually it isnt.
Quick ratio, acid test and otehrs measure it.
 
That's actually 5 years' total expenses.
And even that is wrong on any basis, as it assumes no revenue.
Remind us how you eanred a masters in business from Columbia.
Noob.

Don't you need capital to pay expenses?
 

Why don't you use a graph with the last two years on it?

.

I just gave you the last numbers that have been produced. There are no numbers for 2014 yet......other than an interim report through July which showed a modest increase.

It is on the way up. Period.

You're just like Foo and Fakey.

You got pummeled in my thread about median income dropping under Obama .....then the election comes along and completely backs up what I was saying.....but you start all over with one of the BIG LIES.

I know I know....Democrats won the election and Republicans lost. roll eyes


You need to see a mental health professional.
 

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.
Are you still claiming Nancy Pelosi never heard of Gruber? Yeah, you have integrity.
In fact as I posted incomes are down even cherry picking the data. The fact that you cannot admit incomes have not recovered since the recession was over indicates a deep psychosis.


Deep psychosis is right. Funny, I'm starting to think in those terms about these Libs-in-denial too.

Up is down, right is wrong, big is small to these ppl that are clueless about how the economy works.
 
If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?



Whose household income has dropped? Yours? Not mine.

But I got to think that the loss of thousands of good paying manufacturing jobs might have had an impact on middle class incomes. What do you think? No effect?

And you need to read a few of your fellow right wing posters on here. You seem to think that a lack of income from the masses might cause a lack of demand for goods and services and therefore cause an economy that isn't growing as fast as it could.

But, the problem is the ultra wealthy. They won't spend their money because of Obama. SO no jobs.
Has nothing to do with lack of demand. I learned that bullshit on here.

You think like a Socialist. Industrialists are dis-incentivized under Socialist and Socialist leaning politicians.

Enough said.
 
Thanks for that totally useless answer. But then, why should I expect anything else from you?

I can't help it if you don't know the meaning of total capital.
It's meaningless. DOes "total capital" mean the total of expenditures? The total net worth of the business times 5? There's no such thing as "total capital". This must be something else you learned in your masters of business at Columbia.

He doesn't know what it means. He just read it on some business blog.

Amusing! Neither one of you know know the term total capital. Very telling.
Here's your chance to show off what you learned with a masters in business from Columbia! Enlighten us poor rubes!


Columbia is where Buffett went. It's the most left leaning Econ department in the country.

No wonder this guy can't get things right either.
 
'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. In which case you'd have more luck turning water into wine than seeing 99 weeks of unemployment creating a strong thriving economy. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?


Wow, I've missed being on this thread with all the comrades.

They were too stupid to question the professors in college who were dishing out big spending economic theories.
 
Columbia is where Buffett went. It's the most left leaning Econ department in the country.

No wonder this guy can't get things right either.

Then please educate us......I need a laugh.


Educate you??? Dude, haven't you read my threads...all of which predicted in advance what was happening in the economy, in foreign policy, and in the election?

I'm the one laughing, darlin
 
We're all waiting for 1%braincell to explain it to us.

Since you rubes can't figure it out I'll tell you.

Five years total capital is all the money the you need to operate for five years.

You have to be kidding. Anyone who has that much money doesn't need to start a business. He's already a multimillionaire.
 
Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. In which case you'd have more luck turning water into wine than seeing 99 weeks of unemployment creating a strong thriving economy. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Middle class spending creates jobs.

Yeah, we know: jobs create jobs. And around the 1% wheel of circular logic we go.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom