Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

[The Rabbi]

Household incomes have risen since 2011.

Put the hookah down ...

Falling income rising poverty State of Working America

Real Household Incomes Fall 5.9 Under Obama

Median Income Falls For 5th Year Inequality At Record High

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ncome-down-7-3-since-start-of-recession/?_r=0

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444426404577647470593975642

The ones from the New York Times, Huffington Post, Working America and the Wall Street Journal all have pictures just in case you have trouble with comprehension.

.

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.

Are you still claiming Nancy Pelosi never heard of Gruber? Yeah, you have integrity.
In fact as I posted incomes are down even cherry picking the data. The fact that you cannot admit incomes have not recovered since the recession was over indicates a deep psychosis.

 

[The Rabbi]

Household incomes have risen since 2011.

Put the hookah down ...

Falling income rising poverty State of Working America

Real Household Incomes Fall 5.9 Under Obama

Median Income Falls For 5th Year Inequality At Record High

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ncome-down-7-3-since-start-of-recession/?_r=0

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444426404577647470593975642

The ones from the New York Times, Huffington Post, Working America and the Wall Street Journal all have pictures just in case you have trouble with comprehension.

.

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.

And since you need others to read a chart: the chart you posted shows incomes are lower now than 2011.
No need to thank me.

 

[Antares]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Household incomes have risen since 2011. The economy is growing.

Wages are stagnant........but that's a symptom of trickle down economic policies.

The US government is the spender of last resort. When corporations have record profits and a historically low tax burden.....and they STILL won't invest in their employees.....or invest in capital.......then the US government needs to.

Look how easy it is to grasp once you get your facts right!

You don't think Pelosi knew Gruber?

 

[The Rabbi]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Household incomes have risen since 2011. The economy is growing.

Wages are stagnant........but that's a symptom of trickle down economic policies.

The US government is the spender of last resort. When corporations have record profits and a historically low tax burden.....and they STILL won't invest in their employees.....or invest in capital.......then the US government needs to.

Look how easy it is to grasp once you get your facts right!

You don't think Pelosi knew Gruber?

Not in the Biblical sense anyway. Or maybe she did.
LoneHuffer is like an alcoholic. He doesnt have a problem. Everyone else has the problem.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Household incomes have risen since 2011.

Put the hookah down ...

Falling income rising poverty State of Working America

Real Household Incomes Fall 5.9 Under Obama

Median Income Falls For 5th Year Inequality At Record High

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ncome-down-7-3-since-start-of-recession/?_r=0

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444426404577647470593975642

The ones from the New York Times, Huffington Post, Working America and the Wall Street Journal all have pictures just in case you have trouble with comprehension.

.

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.

Are you still claiming Nancy Pelosi never heard of Gruber? Yeah, you have integrity.
In fact as I posted incomes are down even cherry picking the data. The fact that you cannot admit incomes have not recovered since the recession was over indicates a deep psychosis.

Incomes have risen since 2011. Enjoy the facts.

 

[LoneLaugher]

'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Household incomes have risen since 2011. The economy is growing.

Wages are stagnant........but that's a symptom of trickle down economic policies.

The US government is the spender of last resort. When corporations have record profits and a historically low tax burden.....and they STILL won't invest in their employees.....or invest in capital.......then the US government needs to.

Look how easy it is to grasp once you get your facts right!

You don't think Pelosi knew Gruber?

Never said that. I said she knew of him. Clearly.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Household incomes have risen since 2011.

Put the hookah down ...

Falling income rising poverty State of Working America

Real Household Incomes Fall 5.9 Under Obama

Median Income Falls For 5th Year Inequality At Record High

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2...ncome-down-7-3-since-start-of-recession/?_r=0

http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB10000872396390444426404577647470593975642

The ones from the New York Times, Huffington Post, Working America and the Wall Street Journal all have pictures just in case you have trouble with comprehension.

.

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.

And since you need others to read a chart: the chart you posted shows incomes are lower now than 2011.
No need to thank me.

Nope. The chart doesn't even include 2014. You might be retarded.

 

[BlackSand]

I will accept your apology any time.

I provided several links to graphs and articles that contradict yours ... And used a broad base of political persuasions such as adding the New York Times and Huffington Post. The Median House Income cratered again in 2013 after the ACA went into effect.

Use a current graph next time ... Or smoke some more and pass out.

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I will accept your apology any time.

I provided several links to graphs and articles that contradict yours ... And used a broad base of political persuasions such as adding the New York Times and Huffington Post. The Median House Income cratered again in 2013 after the ACA went into effect.

Use a current graph next time ... Or smoke some more and pass out.

.

All of your links discuss the median income drop that began before the president took office. You saddle him with the drop that continued for two years into his presidency. You ignore the fact that the drop ended and that the median income is rising. It has been since 2011.

There is no other discussion needed. Your contention is false.

 

[LoneLaugher]

US Household Income Department of Numbers

 

[BlackSand]

I will accept your apology any time.

I provided several links to graphs and articles that contradict yours ... And used a broad base of political persuasions such as adding the New York Times and Huffington Post. The Median House Income cratered again in 2013 after the ACA went into effect.

Use a current graph next time ... Or smoke some more and pass out.

.

All of your links discuss the median income drop that began before the president took office. You saddle him with the drop that continued for two years into his presidency. You ignore the fact that the drop ended and that the median income is rising. It has been since 2011.

There is no other discussion needed. Your contention is false.

It fell in 2013 Loner ... When people lost their jobs or were switched to part-time work due to the ACA ... And is lower now. You can tell yourself whatever you want ... But you are still wrong.

.

 

[BlackSand]

US Household Income Department of Numbers

Why don't you use a graph with the last two years on it?

.

 

[LoneLaugher]

US Household Income Department of Numbers

Why don't you use a graph with the last two years on it?

.

I just gave you the last numbers that have been produced. There are no numbers for 2014 yet......other than an interim report through July which showed a modest increase.

It is on the way up. Period.

 

[Toro]

What an icredibly dumb thing for Hillary to say.

She doesn't do left-wing populism well.

 

[BlackSand]

US Household Income Department of Numbers

Why don't you use a graph with the last two years on it?

.

I just gave you the last numbers that have been produced. There are no numbers for 2014 yet......other than an interim report through July which showed a modest increase.

It is on the way up. Period.

No it isn't ... Get back to us when you can talk about more the 2011-12.

.

 

[The Rabbi]

US Household Income Department of Numbers

Yup, another link showing flat income, lower in the last year posted than 2011.
You're doing a great job proving the point,. At least if the point is you're an idiot.

 

[OnePercenter]

We're all waiting for 1%braincell to explain it to us.

Since you rubes can't figure it out I'll tell you.

Five years total capital is all the money the you need to operate for five years.

 

[OnePercenter]

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. In which case you'd have more luck turning water into wine than seeing 99 weeks of unemployment creating a strong thriving economy. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Middle class spending creates jobs.

 

[OnePercenter]

.

The only time I've ever seen the term "total capital' used was as a measure of a bank's financial health.

What in the world does this have to do with the thread?

Total capital is used to measure the health of any business.

 

[The Rabbi]

We're all waiting for 1%braincell to explain it to us.

Since you rubes can't figure it out I'll tell you.

Five years total capital is all the money the you need to operate for five years.

That's actually 5 years' total expenses.
And even that is wrong on any basis, as it assumes no revenue.
Remind us how you eanred a masters in business from Columbia.
Noob.