Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

What is "5 years total capital?" Does that mean everything you'll spend for 5 years, include your employees wages? That would run into the millions of dollars even for a small business. Who do you think you're kidding?

Total capital.

Thanks for that totally useless answer. But then, why should I expect anything else from you?

I can't help it if you don't know the meaning of total capital.
It's meaningless. DOes "total capital" mean the total of expenditures? The total net worth of the business times 5? There's no such thing as "total capital". This must be something else you learned in your masters of business at Columbia.

He doesn't know what it means. He just read it on some business blog.

Amusing! Neither one of you know know the term total capital. Very telling.
 
FALSE PREMISES, DISTORTIONS AND LIES, THE ONLY THING RIGHT WINGERS HAVE

The posit again

"Of course there's the Clinton tax increase that did not inhibit growth and was followed by a balanced budget"



YOUR posit was after Dems/BJ Bill's tax increase, the economy went into a recession, 7+ years later? LOL


Nope. Allow me to quote:

No, the 1993 tax increase where BJ Bill and the Dems, without a single GOPer voting for it, created 3 new tax brackets and took the top rate from 31% to 39.6% and saw the economy boom and deficit lowered.
In other words, Clinton's tax increase made the economy boom. Now explain how a tax increase makes the economy grow. We're all dying to have a good laugh over your explanation.

Yep, you keep proving how dumb you are. WHERE did I say thanks to tax increases the economy boomed? My posit, was in answer to YOURS that said it lead to a recession? Weird you don't get that


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits."
— Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994


"Clinton’s 1993 budget cuts (deficit reduction, tax increases and cuts), which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997

I said the Bush tax increase led to a recession, Nimrod.


LOL, Sure it did Bubba, NOT 12 years of GOP blowing up spending WHILE cutting revenues, even Poppy's small tax increase couldn't help/ Ever hear of Biz cycles Bubba? lol

Huh?

ROFLMNAO!

You can NOT make this crap up! Red meat for the comrades... (And Gruber called 'em "STUPID!"... LOL!)
 
Total capital.

Thanks for that totally useless answer. But then, why should I expect anything else from you?

I can't help it if you don't know the meaning of total capital.
It's meaningless. DOes "total capital" mean the total of expenditures? The total net worth of the business times 5? There's no such thing as "total capital". This must be something else you learned in your masters of business at Columbia.

He doesn't know what it means. He just read it on some business blog.

Amusing! Neither one of you know know the term total capital. Very telling.
Here's your chance to show off what you learned with a masters in business from Columbia! Enlighten us poor rubes!
 
Here's your chance to show off what you learned with a masters in business from Columbia! Enlighten us poor rubes!



Enlighten a ******* rube rabbit? LMAO. Ain't happening. Pass the Blatz.
 
Rabbit, so I busted a nut all over your face eh? Is that your "wishful thinking"? Weird ass rabbit.

Hey rabbit you ever take me up on that bet about me not having 100 dollars?

Did you get down to the homeless shelter last night to stay warm. Soup kitchen feed you? Who knew that the library opened so early so you could post more drivel. I'll be damned. You got a key?
 
'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. In which case you'd have more luck turning water into wine than seeing 99 weeks of unemployment creating a strong thriving economy. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?
 
Last edited:
If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?



Whose household income has dropped? Yours? Not mine.

But I got to think that the loss of thousands of good paying manufacturing jobs might have had an impact on middle class incomes. What do you think? No effect?

And you need to read a few of your fellow right wing posters on here. You seem to think that a lack of income from the masses might cause a lack of demand for goods and services and therefore cause an economy that isn't growing as fast as it could.

But, the problem is the ultra wealthy. They won't spend their money because of Obama. SO no jobs.
Has nothing to do with lack of demand. I learned that bullshit on here.
 
'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Household incomes have risen since 2011. The economy is growing.

Wages are stagnant........but that's a symptom of trickle down economic policies.

The US government is the spender of last resort. When corporations have record profits and a historically low tax burden.....and they STILL won't invest in their employees.....or invest in capital.......then the US government needs to.

Look how easy it is to grasp once you get your facts right!
 
Total capital.

Thanks for that totally useless answer. But then, why should I expect anything else from you?

I can't help it if you don't know the meaning of total capital.
It's meaningless. DOes "total capital" mean the total of expenditures? The total net worth of the business times 5? There's no such thing as "total capital". This must be something else you learned in your masters of business at Columbia.

He doesn't know what it means. He just read it on some business blog.

Amusing! Neither one of you know know the term total capital. Very telling.

You're making it obvious that you have no idea what it means.
 
.

The only time I've ever seen the term "total capital' used was as a measure of a bank's financial health.

What in the world does this have to do with the thread?

.

We're all waiting for 1%braincell to explain it to us.
 
'DON'T LET ANYBODY TELL YOU' THAT 'BUSINESSES CREATE JOBS'

Yet you have the most difficult time effectively proving that amidst all the examples that demonstrate otherwise, and you are unable to counter. Let me guess, you are one of those extremists who somehow believes a deep recession can be revived through federal unemployment extensions, that takes from government revenue at a rate that is more than it could possibly hope to recoup in return. If such a theory among Democrats is true, why have household incomes dropped under this administration and the economy remains stagnant?

Household incomes have risen since 2011. The economy is growing.



Look how easy it is to grasp once you get your facts right!
No, that is untrue.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acsbr12-02.pdf
The overall shows a .1% increase (that's point one percent) within a margin of error higher than that. Effectively income is down. I would suspect if you took out the highest 5% of earners it is down even more.
It is undoubted we have the worst recovery on record. Over 60% of people surveyed believe the recession never ended. That is because their income and wealth have not recovred to where it was the day Bush left office.
Get your facts right and the rest is easy!
 
15th post
.

The only time I've ever seen the term "total capital' used was as a measure of a bank's financial health.

What in the world does this have to do with the thread?

.

We're all waiting for 1%braincell to explain it to us.
He wont. He cant because he doesnt understand it himself. He was absent that day in his masters in business at COlumbia class.
 

Let's do what nutters do and pretend that time began in January 2009. Let's disregard the cause of the decline that we see in the following chart.

What do you see after 20011? Is the number lower now or higher now than it was in 2011?

http://news.investors.com/photopopu...urce=&width=800&height=492&caption=&id=626959

I will accept your apology any time.
 
Back
Top Bottom