Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

[OnePercenter]

That running a business is not complicated?

I honestly don't know how to communicate with someone who would think that. It would be like a auto mechanic trying to tell me how to rebuild a transmission, a complete waste of time.

I told you: I believe you when you say that running a business is not complicated. Seriously. I have no reason to waste time trying to change your mind.

You win. It's easy as pie. No sweat.

And you continue bloviating.

 

[The Rabbi]

Thats why they can say "You didnt build that." That's why they think just being smart or just working hard arent enough and you need the gov't to succeed.

No business owner actually built their business. Their employes did. Business owners build a platform and plan expansion.

And businesses owned and operated by one person?
If you think that's what business owners do, you have no idea.
Actually you've proven you don't have a ******* clue. There are many business owners on this site. We all know you are talking out of your ass. You never took a business course, much less started a business. And I doubt you ever worked for one either.

 

[OnePercenter]

Sure. I'll do one.

Hmm.

Human resources during uncertain economic times.

I know, I know. Easy.

Finally!!!

You do know that 'uncertain economic times' is a bull shit term. There is always a sector that is always moving. It's the business owners job to exploit that sector.

 

[emilynghiem]

Thats why they can say "You didnt build that." That's why they think just being smart or just working hard arent enough and you need the gov't to succeed.

No business owner actually built their business. Their employes did. Business owners build a platform and plan expansion.

Yes and No, OnePercenter.
Yes, you need the employees or you don't have a business.
Just like you need customers or you don't have a business.

But can you name ONE business that coudl work on its own
with "any old schmoe in charge?"

All the businesses I found that fell apart or had problems at the top
was due to the owners or managers with conflicts and crashed or abused the company.

So this DOES have a direct effect who is in charge and the
SPIRIT/Vision and intent/ethics of that person who INFLUENCES all the employees to do their jobs.

If you have piss poor management who is inconsistent and doesn't respect anyone,
then the workers are not going to respect ethics either.

It's not like they magically work together as a team "automatically"

Just interview workers at the POST OFFICE or Public and Private SCHOOLS,
and they will tell you how much it matters who is running management and how they
determine if the team works together or not.

Ask people who work for SHEILA JACKSON LEE how productive their
staff is, compared to other people they've worked for. Just ask workers
and find out how important it is who their boss is, what their vision and ethics are!

 

[OnePercenter]

Your "prove me wrong" schtick is silly since all you've given us is your opinion.

And yet you can't refute anything I've posted.

You've never owned a business, that much is obvious.

I've owned two which I sold for tens of millions.

I currently own a company that will gross $100M this year.

 

[Oldstyle]

The context of what Hillary said was the failure of trickle down, which is

1. a fact, and,

2. irrelevant to the RWnuts.

Horse shit, that's how she tried to cover it after the fact, how do you even look at yourself in the mirror?

Businesses create jobs IS trickle down. Trickle down is complete bullshit.

I'll make my case.

Baring inception, will a business owner expand and hire more if she/he doesn't have an increased customer base?

You are so incredibly ignorant about what makes business owners expand and hire it's not even funny! Business owners start and expand businesses with the anticipation of making a profit. The size of the customer base has little to do with people taking the risk to invest capital...if the customer base is HUGE but the potential to make profit is tiny...then those with capital will not risk it.

And once again...there is no such thing as "trickle down"...it's a term invented by liberal with little experience with economics to justify policies that make no sense if one DOES understand economics!

As an owner I pay those who work for me continually through the process of starting and running a business...I'm required by law to pay them their wages BEFORE I can take out profits!

 

[OnePercenter]

Trickle down gets you bloated 1% and no money available for demand. See sig pp1- Great job, Pubbies!

Not true pablo, I'm doing fine.

Define, fine.

 

[Oldstyle]

Your "prove me wrong" schtick is silly since all you've given us is your opinion.

And yet you can't refute anything I've posted.

You've never owned a business, that much is obvious.

I've owned two which I sold for tens of millions.

I currently own a company that will gross $100M this year.

You are so OBVIOUSLY full of shit that it border on farce. I suppose you're married to Morgan Fairchild as well?

 

[OnePercenter]

Sorry son, the "employee" is the end user so to speak, glad I could help.

The end user is a marketing term defining the person that buys the product.

An employee makes all of the money for the employer.

 

[Dad2three]

FALSE PREMISES, DISTORTIONS AND LIES, THE ONLY THING RIGHT WINGERS HAVE

The posit again

"Of course there's the Clinton tax increase that did not inhibit growth and was followed by a balanced budget"



YOUR posit was after Dems/BJ Bill's tax increase, the economy went into a recession, 7+ years later? LOL

Nope. Allow me to quote:

No, the 1993 tax increase where BJ Bill and the Dems, without a single GOPer voting for it, created 3 new tax brackets and took the top rate from 31% to 39.6% and saw the economy boom and deficit lowered.
​

In other words, Clinton's tax increase made the economy boom. Now explain how a tax increase makes the economy grow. We're all dying to have a good laugh over your explanation.

Yep, you keep proving how dumb you are. WHERE did I say thanks to tax increases the economy boomed? My posit, was in answer to YOURS that said it lead to a recession? Weird you don't get that


"The deficit has come down, and I give the Clinton Administration and President Clinton himself a lot of credit for that. [He] did something about it, fast. And I think we are seeing some benefits."
— Paul Volcker, Federal Reserve Board Chairman (1979-1987), in Audacity, Fall 1994


"Clinton’s 1993 budget cuts (deficit reduction, tax increases and cuts), which reduced projected red ink by more than $400 billion over five years, sparked a major drop in interest rates that helped boost investment in all the equipment and systems that brought forth the New Age economy of technological innovation and rising productivity."
— Business Week, May 19, 1997

I said the Bush tax increase led to a recession, Nimrod.

LOL, Sure it did Bubba, NOT 12 years of GOP blowing up spending WHILE cutting revenues, even Poppy's small tax increase couldn't help/ Ever hear of Biz cycles Bubba? lol

Huh?

LOL, Of course you don't understand how 12 years of GOPers blowing up the debt and decreasing revenues WHILE ignoring the warnings on the S&L crisis, MIGHT come back to hurt US


Google a Biz cycle Bubba

 

[OnePercenter]

We'll do it again next Tuesday, were you going to try and stop any of us?

I don't have any intention of stopping you. I want to say thank you for voting Republican so I can pay less effective tax than you and deduct my private jet, property, and my entire lifestyle.

What you need to understand that by not voting Democrat is that you've screwed yourself, your family, your Kids, your Grand Kids, and your neighbors.

Don't you feel proud?

 

[Antares]

Your "prove me wrong" schtick is silly since all you've given us is your opinion.

And yet you can't refute anything I've posted.

You've never owned a business, that much is obvious.

I've owned two which I sold for tens of millions.

I currently own a company that will gross $100M this year.

Let me help you, nobody needs to "refute" your "opinions",you do understand that don't you?

Sure you do, except that your opinions thus far are just silly.

 

[OnePercenter]

It's impossible to refute bullshit.

Sure it is. Quit bloviating. There, I did it.

 

[OnePercenter]

Yeah we heard you Barak Warren Clinton.

Prove it wrong.

 

[Antares]

Sorry son, the "employee" is the end user so to speak, glad I could help.

The end user is a marketing term defining the person that buys the product.

An employee makes all of the money for the employer.

You seem to have a very limited intellect, is the allusion beyond you?

Your business views don't apply to "small business" which far and away is the largest group of employers we have.

 

[Dad2three]

The ***** of Benghazi "came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt" while "dodging sniper bullets" but "What difference – at this point, what difference does it make?"

"Obama in a pants suit". Another Soros puppet Alinskyite.

For the record, the reason is that she wasn’t fired from that job. It didn’t happen. I knew where that rumor originated—it’s not a new story—because it first arose in Bill Clinton’s second term, when I covered the White House. But I was curious how it flew around the world so fast. The short answer is Rush Limbaugh. The longer answer is the way Americans communicate with each other these days.

The Smear Factor Why We Hate Politics RealClearPolitics

SNOPES

FALSE

snopes.com Jerry Zeifman Fired Hillary Clinton from the Watergate Investigation

 

[Dad2three]

"
Appearing at a Boston rally for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley on Friday, Hillary Clinton told the crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel not to listen to anybody who says that “businesses create jobs.”

Hillary Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

....and you Lefty pusillanimous puss pockets will lap this right up.

The democrats are putting up another moron for president. God help this country.

True, can you imagine the even bigger loser the GOP puts up?

 

[Antares]

Yeah we heard you Barak Warren Clinton.

Prove it wrong.

No need to it's your "opinion" no more,no less....you aren't very good at this, I would think a millionaire like yourself would be better equipped for this debate.

 

[Dad2three]

I hope this thread goes on till the 2016 election. She is never going to live this down. I will hound her ass on twitter then like I have today. Throw in the towel now, Hills.

You ain't weazling out of this one.

Yes, we know, 45% of AmeriKans are slow and can't use reason, logic or honesty. Thanks for pointing it out, again

 

[Dad2three]

most of their base doesn't have a job, they are on welfare. It pits the unemployed dems (lots of them) vs the "rich" white bizness owners

Among the 254 counties where food stamp recipients doubled between 2007 and 2011, Republican Mitt Romney won 213 of them in last year’s presidential election, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data compiled by Bloomberg. Kentucky’s Owsley County, which backed Romney with 81 percent of its vote, has the largest proportion of food stamp recipients among those that he carried.

Food Stamp Cut Backed by Republicans With Voters on Rolls - Bloomberg


Red States Mostly Welfare States Dependent On Blue States But Likely Too Uninformed to Know
Red States Mostly Welfare States Dependent On Blue States But Likely Too Uninformed to Know


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala A theory of a divided nation

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia Red States are from Guatemala New Republic