Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

[OnePercenter]

Now you are moving goal posts. It's much more complicated than being an employee BUT it is doable if you are willing to bust your butt doing something you are good at and willing to take the chance. If you need big capital you need to find others willing to take the chance with you.

Goal posts never moved.

It is more complicated than being an employee, I never stated it wasn't. That's why I stated if you can't make at least three times more why do it.

If you bust your butt you're doing it wrong. Employees are the ones that bust their butt to make you all of your money.

You do need 'big capital.' You take your business plan to the 'big capital' guy who either funds or not funds. If she/he doesn't fund, you go back and redo 'cause you missed something.

 

[OnePercenter]

Are you looking for tips, maybe start a economic advisory service?

You have federal and state quarterly taxes to pay, based on your on going records, inventory, sales, advertising, satisfying people from all walks of life, some not so pleasant, utilities, maintenance, inspections, licensing, insurance, location, overhead, etc. for starters. Add an employee and it gets complicated.

You hire a General Manager, accounting firm, and an advertising company.

 

[francoHFW]

Trickle down gets you bloated 1% and no money available for demand. See sig pp1- Great job, Pubbies!

 

[OnePercenter]

No reason. I'd be wasting my time.

You're right, operating a business is easy. Just open the doors and the money pours in.

Right on, bro.

The reason is because you can't.

 

[Antares]

Now you are moving goal posts. It's much more complicated than being an employee BUT it is doable if you are willing to bust your butt doing something you are good at and willing to take the chance. If you need big capital you need to find others willing to take the chance with you.

Goal posts never moved.

It is more complicated than being an employee, I never stated it wasn't. That's why I stated if you can't make at least three times more why do it.

If you bust your butt you're doing it wrong. Employees are the ones that bust their butt to make you all of your money.

You do need 'big capital.' You take your business plan to the 'big capital' guy who either funds or not funds. If she/he doesn't fund, you go back and redo 'cause you missed something.

Your "prove me wrong" schtick is silly since all you've given us is your opinion.

You've never owned a business, that much is obvious.

 

[Antares]

Trickle down gets you bloated 1% and no money available for demand. See sig pp1- Great job, Pubbies!

Not true pablo, I'm doing fine.

 

[OnePercenter]

You don't get it both ways, employment IS trickle down.
The people I work for have a lot of money, I go to work every day, I work very hard, they give me their money.

THE VERY DEFINITION of trickle down.

Trickle down is receiving monies for doing nothing, being employed is not doing nothing.

 

[Antares]

You don't get it both ways, employment IS trickle down.
The people I work for have a lot of money, I go to work every day, I work very hard, they give me their money.

THE VERY DEFINITION of trickle down.

Trickle down is receiving monies for doing nothing, being employed is not doing nothing.

Sorry son, the "employee" is the end user so to speak, glad I could help.

 

[OnePercenter]

.

Come to think of it, OnePercenter has provided us with a great lesson here. All it takes is:

1. Five years operating capital
2. Know who to hire (which can be farmed out)
3. Never ever, ever, ever hire family

I hope all the other lefties are taking notes, this really is gold.

You too, can be rich. Those three steps are all it takes. Bingo bango.

It's not complicated at all.

Oxygen, I need oxygen...

Yet you can't refute what I wrote.

 

[OnePercenter]

Hillary is apparently telling Americans that low employment is their fault. We haven't demanded enough goods and services. I feel ashamed.

Those that voted Republican in the last 40 years are the problem.

 

[Antares]

Hillary is apparently telling Americans that low employment is their fault. We haven't demanded enough goods and services. I feel ashamed.

Those that voted Republican in the last 40 years are the problem.

We'll do it again next Tuesday, were you going to try and stop any of us?

 

[francoHFW]

Trickle down gets you bloated 1% and no money available for demand. See sig pp1- Great job, Pubbies!

Not true pablo, I'm doing fine.

We're talking in general, not your fantasy...

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg image
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--September 18 2014
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

 

[OnePercenter]

Before they opened a new store they had no customer base.
Next.

Sure they did. Have you ever been asked your zip code when you purchased something? The company is seeking information to expand based on you home.

Slide your card at the register? Same thing. Credit card companies routinely sell information about you.

Use a coupon? Same thing. Coupons have ID's based on where the flyer was mailed.

Do you know what a population density map does?

 

[Antares]

Trickle down gets you bloated 1% and no money available for demand. See sig pp1- Great job, Pubbies!

Not true pablo, I'm doing fine.

We're talking in general, not your fantasy...

The Demise of the American Middle Class In Numbers.

Over the past 30 years the American dream has gradually disappeared. The process was slow, so most people didn’t notice. They just worked a few more hours, borrowed a little more and cut back on non-essentials. But looking at the numbers and comparing them over long time periods, it is obvious that things have changed drastically. Here are the details:

1. WORKERS PRODUCE MORE BUT THE GAINS GO TO BUSINESS.

Over the past 63 years worker productivity has grown by 2.0% per year.

But after 1980, workers received a smaller share every year. Labor’s share of income (1992 = 100%):

1950 = 101%
1960 = 105%
1970 = 105%
1980 = 105% – Reagan
1990 = 100%
2000 = 96%
2007 = 92%

A 13% drop since 1980

2. THE TOP 10% GET A LARGER SHARE.

Share of National Income going to Top 10%:

1950 = 35%
1960 = 34%
1970 = 34%
1980 = 34% – Reagan
1990 = 40%
2000 = 47%
2007 = 50%

An increase of 16% since Reagan.

3. WORKERS COMPENSATED FOR THE LOSS OF INCOME BY SPENDING THEIR SAVINGS.

The savings Rose up to Reagan and fell during and after.

1950 = 6.0%
1960 = 7.0%
1970 = 8.5%
1980 = 10.0% – Reagan
1982 = 11.2% – Peak
1990 = 7.0%
2000 = 2.0%
2006 = -1.1% (Negative = withdrawing from savings)

A 12.3% drop after Reagan.

4. WORKERS ALSO BORROWED TO MAKE UP FOR THE LOSS.

Household Debt as percentage of GDP:

1965 = 46%
1970 = 45%
1980 = 50% – Reagan
1990 = 61%
2000 = 69%
2007 = 95%

A 45% increase after 1980.

5. SO THE GAP BETWEEN THE RICHEST AND THE POOREST HAS GROWN.

Gap Between the Share of Capital Income earned by the top 1%
and the bottom 80%:

1980 = 10%
2003 = 56%

A 5.6 times increase.

6. AND THE AMERICAN DREAM IS GONE.

The Probably of Moving Up from the Bottom 40% to the Top 40%:

1945 = 12%
1958 = 6%
1990 = 3%
2000 = 2%

A 10% Decrease.

Links:

1 = ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/pf/totalf1.txt
1 = https://www.clevelandfed.org/Research/PolicyDis/No7Nov04.pdf
1 = Clipboard01.jpg image
2 – Congratulations to Emmanuel Saez The White House
3 = http://www.demos.org/inequality/images/charts/uspersonalsaving_thumb.gif
3 = U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis BEA
4 = http://www.prudentbear.com/index.php/household-sector-debt-of-gdp
4 = FRB Z.1 Release--Financial Accounts of the United States--September 18 2014
5/6 = Wealth And Inequality In America - Business Insider

Overview = http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010062415/reagan-revolution-home-roost-charts

Pedro?

You are assuming that most are like, wanting more for doing nothing.

Not the way it works.

There are people like me all over this Nation who simply decide they want more and then do what they need to do to get it, now I know that that is beyond you....but that's ok.

 

[OnePercenter]

Missed the point much?

No. I'm dead on.

 

[jon_berzerk]

here is how it works

a democrat says anything

sheeple defend it

even after the dem back peddles it

sheeple defend it

the leaders call them useful idiots

If you don't know than admit it! Don't bloviate it!

O'Reilly would be so proud --LOL

 

[OnePercenter]

Thats why they can say "You didnt build that." That's why they think just being smart or just working hard arent enough and you need the gov't to succeed.

No business owner actually built their business. Their employes did. Business owners build a platform and plan expansion.

 

[MaryL]

"
Appearing at a Boston rally for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Martha Coakley on Friday, Hillary Clinton told the crowd gathered at the Park Plaza Hotel not to listen to anybody who says that “businesses create jobs.”

Hillary Don t Let Anybody Tell You That Businesses Create Jobs

....and you Lefty pusillanimous puss pockets will lap this right up.

Hillary and Bill Clinton make millions for doing NOTHING. What do they do? It's little wonder Hillary would say something like this, these leeches suck off the blood of small little hard working people with well meaning aspirations. I once voted for Bill Clinton. I did a lot of well intended but mistaken things in my life, forgive me. So, if there were NO business, what JOBS would we have? Working for politians making hot air? Sorry, that's not how economics works, and Hillary knows it.

 

[The Rabbi]

.

Come to think of it, OnePercenter has provided us with a great lesson here. All it takes is:

1. Five years operating capital
2. Know who to hire (which can be farmed out)
3. Never ever, ever, ever hire family

I hope all the other lefties are taking notes, this really is gold.

You too, can be rich. Those three steps are all it takes. Bingo bango.

It's not complicated at all.

Oxygen, I need oxygen...

Yet you can't refute what I wrote.

It's impossible to refute bullshit.

 

[Antares]

Thats why they can say "You didnt build that." That's why they think just being smart or just working hard arent enough and you need the gov't to succeed.

No business owner actually built their business. Their employes did. Business owners build a platform and plan expansion.

Yeah we heard you Barak Warren Clinton.