Dominion continues to defy subpoenas in AZ audit

And the legislature has recourse if the POTUS refuses to comply.

The point (which you are continuing to redirect toward Trump, like Lindsey Lohan's character in Mean Girls who couldn't stop talking about Rachal McAdam's character) is that private companies are subject to subpoena power.
The legislature is not in session and will not be until next year.
 
"It is unfortunate the noncompliance by the County and Dominion continues to delay the results and breeds distrust," she said.

The subpoenas demanded routers, machine passwords and voter registration records from the county, and the same machine passwords from Dominion.

Instead of complying, attorneys for Dominion and the supervisors sent letters to the Senate. The supervisors said they have given what they are legally and responsibly able to provide, and Dominion said that they don't legally have to provide anything, given they are a public company.

Supervisor Bill Gates noted that the Senate doesn't have the votes to hold them in contempt, and the judge didn't order them to comply. He said that the subpoenas are not a "serious" request, and called it "political theater."

County leaders flatly refused to provide routers that were requested, which they have done since they were first requested as part of earlier subpoenas.

"Specifically, providing these routers puts sensitive, confidential data belonging to Maricopa County citizens — including Social Security numbers and protected health information — at risk. Further, the Maricopa County Sheriff has explained that the production of the routers would render MCSO internal law enforcement communication infrastructure extremely vulnerable to hackers,” wrote Thomas Liddy, civil division chief for the County Attorney's Office.
I have already told you that excuse is bullshit. Also when does Dominion tell anyone what is legal or not? If there was no fraud what is the problem?
 
I have already told you that excuse is bullshit. Also when does Dominion tell anyone what is legal or not? If there was no fraud what is the problem?
Yeah, you know everything in the world except the truth. Corporations and you do not go around exposing yer most sensitive data because some dork cries that an election was stolen.

But, according to you I need to see all your private personal info to see that you have nothing to hide...I can tell you were a cheerleader for the urinalysis test for employment.
 
That is what the company claims and the Arizona Senate has no power to force them into supplication.

They were also filing frivolous lawsuits they couldn't win against news organizations

And I'm supposed to take their lawyer's word for it?

Nah
 
Yeah, you know everything in the world except the truth. Corporation and you do not go around exposing yer most sensitive data because some dork cries that an election was stolen.
Then you do not run an election, dork. Knowing what went on is the peoples right.
 
Why are they against transparency?

---Maricopa County and Dominion continue to defy legislative subpoenas for the items needed by the Arizona Senate to complete the first full forensic election audit in state history.---

Your Q-Kook Frauditeers already ruined all the voting machines with will cost taxpayers at least 3 million to replace. Why would anyone be interested in handing over their passwords, private emails and servers.

Fuck 'em - Time to go home. They've embarrassed Arizona quite enough already.

PS: Can't you loons find a better source than Hateway Pundit? Seriously! :icon_rolleyes:
 
And the legislature has recourse if the POTUS refuses to comply.

The point (which you are continuing to redirect toward Trump, like Lindsey Lohan's character in Mean Girls who couldn't stop talking about Rachal McAdam's character) is that private companies are subject to subpoena power.
What is the penalty for not complying with a legislative subpoena?

There is no ability for them to do anything to a private company for failing to comply.
 

Forum List

Back
Top