What Ratcliffe said then was based on Smith getting caught with his pants down lying to the court. Smith reconfirmed those admissions with a little legal turd polish to congress recently.You’re saying Ratcliffe is talking about Smith’s testimony a year and a half before it happened?
It was a minor issue that could provide reasonable doubt in the FBI's handling of the evidence.Ratcliffe is a Trump hack and his characterization of the issue with the evidence is absurd. There was a minor issue with the way some of the documents were ordered, that’s it.
And disclose them to the media?No being tghe worlds mostg prestigius LEO, you follow the simple procedures associated with taking crime scene photographs of evidence.