If you ask a question in an OP that has already been answered pointing out that fact seems reasonable don't you think?ok, are you both forkup and busybee?
My post 24 was replying to busybee, but I'm happy to reply to your posts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you ask a question in an OP that has already been answered pointing out that fact seems reasonable don't you think?ok, are you both forkup and busybee?
My post 24 was replying to busybee, but I'm happy to reply to your posts.
Well I did, I also watched ideological commentators... VERY ideological commentators.
Barr about 10 seconds in.
-Cannon decided without precedent I'm aware of that she had the right to enjoin in a civil matter the government in the criminal matter of Trump's document stash
-She decided that an injunction that is supposed to have a reasonable chance to succeed in the case of Trump should be executed even if the chances of succeeding were "unlikely"
-She decided that Trump is allowed to attempt to prevent the government from looking at their own documents.
-She decided that a special master should be able to cut out not just documents shielded by attorney-client privilege but also by executive privilege. Without even establishing the parameters for what executive privilege means in this context.
-She decided that irreparable harm is inflicted by the mere threat of an indictment as opposed to the usual standard. An actual indictment.
As a justification for all those things, she came up with some pretty strained arguments that seem to only be applicable to the person Trump.
Namely that somehow his position as a former president makes his reputation somehow more important than that of regular people. And that his previous position somehow makes the presumption of fairness somehow more applicable.
I count at least five actions she took in order to come to her ruling that are rare to unheard of. And the justification for it is pure favoritism without any link to what the law actually states.
ok, but its not my OP.If you ask a question in an OP that has already been answered pointing out that fact seems reasonable don't you think?
Ah, so now Barr all of a sudden wants to "save his career". How pray tell is he doing that exactly by going on Fox and throwing Trump under the bus? Do you think Biden sees that and thinks " this Barr dude is not such a bad guy, after all, let's offer him a job?"I don’t resent Barr for not wanting to lose his career.
Barr will be around until he retires.Ah, so now Barr all of a sudden wants to "save his career". How pray tell is he doing that exactly by going on Fox and throwing Trump under the bus? Do you think Biden sees that and thinks " this Barr dude is not such a bad guy, after all, let's offer him a job?"
We know you don’t value securing one’s property because you don’t own oneUnlikely, and stupid.
Multiple, fake, ever changing names is from people who want to lie and hide.ok, are you both forkup and busybee?
My post 24 was replying to busybee, but I'm happy to reply to your posts.
Or lives in a gated community.We know you don’t value securing one’s property because you don’t own one
Possible 12’X10’ “gated”Or lives in a gated community.
Cannon didn’t follow the law. She demonstrated considerable pro-Trump bias. She practically dude the lawyering for Trump’s crappy lawyers.1. Democrat judges are partisan. Republican judges follow the law. It shouldn't matter who appointed the judge. You're whining that 5 of 11 judges is skewed to Trump?? You aren't a math major are you?
2. So if Cannon's decision is upheld on appeal, you'll apologize to Cannon in a post?
Who gets fired from fox for defending Trump?I don’t resent Barr for not wanting to lose his career.
I think it would stall it anyway, but with time as a critical factor, the DOJ is exercising its concern by way of this bogus special master that does nothing.Of course the DoJ would appeal.
Judge Cannon's ruling would stall and impede the Federal investigation of Trump.
"The U.S. Dept. of Justice on Thursday filed a notice of appeal against U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling allowing Donald Trump the “special master” his legal team requested. The order also halted DOJ from taking any investigative steps in conjunction with the 13,000 items, including more than 100 classified documents federal agents seized during the August 8 search warrant execution of Mar-a-Lago"
"“The Justice Department also argued that a former president cannot assert executive privilege after he leaves office, and that it is not possible for one part of the executive branch to assert privilege to shield documents from another part,” The Washington Post reports, but notes that the “appeals process could take longer than any document review by the special master.”
DOJ appeals Trump judgeâs special master ruling: 'Irreparably harm the government and the public'
The U.S. Dept. of Justice on Thursday filed a notice of appeal against U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon’s ruling allowing Donald Trump the “special master” his legal team requested. The order also halted DOJ from taking any investigative steps in conjunction with the 13,000 items, including...www.rawstory.com
Like most outlets, Fox follows the ratings.Who gets fired from fox for defending Trump?
Some people are all excuses. No brain.
I've heard the same analogy. She granted relief his attorneys didn't even ask for.Cannon didn’t follow the law. She demonstrated considerable pro-Trump bias. She practically dude the lawyering for Trump’s crappy lawyers.
But, but, she was concerned for his reputation. Don't worry about the nuclear secrets. LOL! What a fucking idiot this woman is. She hasn't got enough sense to pour piss out of a boot.Cannon didn’t follow the law. She demonstrated considerable pro-Trump bias. She practically dude the lawyering for Trump’s crappy lawyers.
She's a piece of work.I've heard the same analogy. She granted relief his attorneys didn't even ask for.
You’re out of your mind if you are going to claim that defending Trump costs them ratings.Like most outlets, Fox follows the ratings.
That's why CNN is killing one commentator at a time.
It pulls in the cultists. And they love that.Like most outlets, Fox follows the ratings.
That's why CNN is killing one commentator at a time.
But the public wants a special master so they should get a special master. The law? Who cares.But, but, she was concerned for his reputation. Don't worry about the nuclear secrets. LOL! What a fucking idiot this woman is. She hasn't got enough sense to pour piss out of a boot.