Likkmee
Gold Member
In 1997, in Jackson Hole I saw an Asian tard try to "turn' a Bison to get a better camera shot. He was DOA---pre Corona
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Doing The Right thing to save folks: Canada expected to announce BAN on assault-style weapons, Yep AR-15 types.
- Thread starter Baz Ares
- Start date
Vandalshandle
Gold Member
And the Op'er asked about the U.S. allowing lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers, so your response in the Op'er defense is either based on you did not read that part or you are just responding out of retardation, so which one is it?Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotiaabcnews.go.com
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
In the U.S. ( which is what the Op'er was writing about when commenting about lawsuits ) you should not be allow to sue gun manufacturers because no one is forcing you to buy a gun...
Now watch you will proclaim the Op'er never wrote the U.S. at the end of their Op!
Cousin Bruicie, I was not responding to you, nor am I here to please you, or for you to critic my posts. Please raise your hand if you want to speak in class.
I agree but my point was the shooter could not have easily committed his crimes with an assault weapon dressed as a CMP stopping vehicles. He would have done it with a sidearmWhy would a man dressed as a CMP doing a vehicle stop have an AK 47 in his control during that stop? Those people were killed in their vehiclesI will guess ak-47 or SKS.What weapon was used in the lastest shooting in Canada?Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why would anybody commit a crime?
Bad people do bad things.
Why should the average Canadian citizen, who had never committed a crime in his life, have his right to keep and bear arms taken away because somebody else commits a crime?
Why should any of us have any of our personal Liberties diminished because other people will abuse them?
I think the Libtard press abuses the right of free speech with their anit Right fake news and it does tremendous harm to this country. Should they have their right to free speech taken away?
A firdy -firty against a .223 semi ? Who are you ? Chuck Connors ?Canada is taking MY guns?/ LOL! somehow..i doubt it.
Who cares anyway..Canada has no 2nd amendment....let the moose and elk rejoice!
I don't think I'd want to shoot a moose with a .223
If I had a moose charging at me, I'd shoot it with whatever I could get my hands on!
I agree, but I wouldn't choose a .223 if something more powerful were available. Maybe a .30-30
How about an AR 15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel
Baz Ares
Gold Member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 10,970
- 1,091
- 260
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #105
A firdy -firty against a .223 semi ? Who are you ? Chuck Connors ?Canada is taking MY guns?/ LOL! somehow..i doubt it.
Who cares anyway..Canada has no 2nd amendment....let the moose and elk rejoice!
I don't think I'd want to shoot a moose with a .223
If I had a moose charging at me, I'd shoot it with whatever I could get my hands on!
I agree, but I wouldn't choose a .223 if something more powerful were available. Maybe a .30-30
How about an AR 15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel
Thanks for the freebie when need one.
Luke 11:21
"Luke chapter 11, the parable is as follows: When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. But when someone stronger attacks him and overcomes him, he takes from him his whole armour in which he trusted, and divides his spoils."
Baz Ares
Gold Member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 10,970
- 1,091
- 260
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #106
Canada is not arming to invade countries like the USA wastes billions on repugger welfare programs.Canada has universal healthcare because they don't have a military defense bill to pay and therefore couldn't defend themselves if pushed into a fightCanada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
Bruce_T_Laney
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #107
And the Op'er asked about the U.S. allowing lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers, so your response in the Op'er defense is either based on you did not read that part or you are just responding out of retardation, so which one is it?Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
In the U.S. ( which is what the Op'er was writing about when commenting about lawsuits ) you should not be allow to sue gun manufacturers because no one is forcing you to buy a gun...
Now watch you will proclaim the Op'er never wrote the U.S. at the end of their Op!
Cousin Bruicie, I was not responding to you, nor am I here to please you, or for you to critic my posts. Please raise your hand if you want to speak in class.
Another lie?
So you were not responding to me but responded to me and told me some nonsense about Canada and asshole we are not related and this your last warning, so do not call me your Cousin again!
So you did not read the entire OP and just felt you needed to respond and once it was pointed out your ignorant mistake you instead insult me again.
So let be clear you responded to me, I corrected you and you then lied and said you were never responding to me!
Canada dumbass can't defend itselfCanada is not arming to invade countries like the USA wastes billions on repugger welfare programs.Canada has universal healthcare because they don't have a military defense bill to pay and therefore couldn't defend themselves if pushed into a fightCanada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
View attachment 330974
Because
Luke 11:21
"Luke chapter 11, the parable is as follows: When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. But when someone stronger attacks him and overcomes him, he takes from him his whole armour in which he trusted, and divides his spoils."
A firdy -firty against a .223 semi ? Who are you ? Chuck Connors ?Canada is taking MY guns?/ LOL! somehow..i doubt it.
Who cares anyway..Canada has no 2nd amendment....let the moose and elk rejoice!
I don't think I'd want to shoot a moose with a .223
If I had a moose charging at me, I'd shoot it with whatever I could get my hands on!
I agree, but I wouldn't choose a .223 if something more powerful were available. Maybe a .30-30
How about an AR 15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel
Thanks for the freebie when need one.
Luke 11:21
"Luke chapter 11, the parable is as follows: When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. But when someone stronger attacks him and overcomes him, he takes from him his whole armour in which he trusted, and divides his spoils."
That's why I will remain armed and trained to use my weapons
Vandalshandle
Gold Member
And the Op'er asked about the U.S. allowing lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers, so your response in the Op'er defense is either based on you did not read that part or you are just responding out of retardation, so which one is it?Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
In the U.S. ( which is what the Op'er was writing about when commenting about lawsuits ) you should not be allow to sue gun manufacturers because no one is forcing you to buy a gun...
Now watch you will proclaim the Op'er never wrote the U.S. at the end of their Op!
Cousin Bruicie, I was not responding to you, nor am I here to please you, or for you to critic my posts. Please raise your hand if you want to speak in class.
Another lie?
So you were not responding to me but responded to me and told me some nonsense about Canada and asshole we are not related and this your last warning, so do not call me your Cousin again!
So you did not read the entire OP and just felt you needed to respond and once it was pointed out your ignorant mistake you instead insult me again.
So let be clear you responded to me, I corrected you and you then lied and said you were never responding to me!
As near as I can tell, you support Trump. That being the case, it is impossible to insult you.
Corazon
Platinum Member
This is a very strange news for me...I thought Canada already had one of the strictest gun laws all over the world....Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Last edited:
Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
Canada is not arming to invade countries like the USA wastes billions on repugger welfare programs.Canada has universal healthcare because they don't have a military defense bill to pay and therefore couldn't defend themselves if pushed into a fightCanada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
View attachment 330974
You just get dumber, doncha?
It's the meth.
Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
And the Op'er asked about the U.S. allowing lawsuits against Gun Manufacturers, so your response in the Op'er defense is either based on you did not read that part or you are just responding out of retardation, so which one is it?Canada's government will make an announcement on banning military-style assault weapons "in the coming days," Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Thursday.
"We have long committed to strengthening gun control in this country, including banning military-style assault weapons," Trudeau said at a press briefing. "There is no need in Canada for guns designed to kill the largest amount of people, in the shortest amount of time."
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Canada bans assault weapons after mass shooting in Nova Scotia
Saving folks from AR Assult weapons. Seems the USA need to allow peoples to file lawsuits on makers. Why are gun makers the only companies we can't make them
pay for damages for arming mass murders. And basic Gun Netters in America.
Why you should not be able to sue the makers of a firearm is because they are not forcing anyone to buy their product and it is a damn choice!
If you do not want to own a firearm then by all means do not own one but stop telling people who want to they can not seeing it is their Constitutional Right to Bear Arms...
But, not in Canada. They also declined to get involved in Vietnam. They also have universal healthcare, and virtually no random mass shootings. Must be something in the water...
In the U.S. ( which is what the Op'er was writing about when commenting about lawsuits ) you should not be allow to sue gun manufacturers because no one is forcing you to buy a gun...
Now watch you will proclaim the Op'er never wrote the U.S. at the end of their Op!
Cousin Bruicie, I was not responding to you, nor am I here to please you, or for you to critic my posts. Please raise your hand if you want to speak in class.
Another lie?
So you were not responding to me but responded to me and told me some nonsense about Canada and asshole we are not related and this your last warning, so do not call me your Cousin again!
So you did not read the entire OP and just felt you needed to respond and once it was pointed out your ignorant mistake you instead insult me again.
So let be clear you responded to me, I corrected you and you then lied and said you were never responding to me!
As near as I can tell, you support Trump. That being the case, it is impossible to insult you.
Near as I can tell, you're a radical left democrat. That being the case, it is impossible to reason with you.
China says, Vandal believes, end of story.
Baz Ares
Gold Member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 10,970
- 1,091
- 260
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #114
Saving lives is first in Canada.
Manual six shooter handguns and deleyed 2 secounds firing glocks types should be fully allowed.
Same in the USA.
The guy just sealed reelection.
"Canadian prime ministers do not have a fixed term of office. Nor do they have term limits."
Seem the Great Orange Douche will not win in 2020, what will cowardly DOPer Trumpster do?
Baz Ares
Gold Member
- Feb 2, 2017
- 10,970
- 1,091
- 260
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #115
You can Try suing Chevy now.If someone t-bones me in their Malibu, can I sue Chevy?
Suing gun manufacturers is the height of idiocy.
If you had to ban only one of these, which gun would you ban and why?
Now gun makers.
That just WRONG!
Banned both for public uses.
Manual six-shooter. 3to 5 round clip load bolt action rifle.
Or Shotguns.
Is all any sane hunter or home protector needs.
What is your qualitative experience in the use of deadly force? What gives you the ability to have an opinion on what an individual needs to prevail in a fight for their life?If someone t-bones me in their Malibu, can I sue Chevy?
Suing gun manufacturers is the height of idiocy.
If you had to ban only one of these, which gun would you ban and why?
Manual six-shooter. 3to 5 round clip load bolt action rifle.
Or Shotguns.
Is all any sane hunter or home protector needs.
Canadians still have that enslavement to the crown mentality
Saving lives is first in Canada.
View attachment 331663
Manual six shooter handguns and deleyed 2 secounds firing glocks types should be fully allowed.
Same in the USA.
The guy just sealed reelection.
"Canadian prime ministers do not have a fixed term of office. Nor do they have term limits."
Seem the Great Orange Douche will not win in 2020, what will cowardly DOPer Trumpster do?
Have you ever driven in Toronto?You aren’t Canadian, why do you care?Canada is about to ban rifles from the possession of its subjects, specifically any rifle that looks like a military combat rifle! Why? Because one person misused one!
NEXT UP: Canada to ban TV if someone watches too much.
Canada to ban cars if someone speeds or has a wreck.Canada to ban sex if someone has too many kids.
Canada expected to announce ban on assault-style weapons
Canada’s government is set to announce a ban on assault-style weapons following a deadly shooting in Nova Scotia this month that killed 22 people.Officials told The Associated Press …thehill.com
They park at 95MPH.
You can barely do 30 in Toronto during daylight hours. It's bumper to bumper all day long downtown.
Indeependent
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2013
- 73,633
- 28,500
- 2,250
I wish it was like than when I was there; nobody would let anyone else change lanes.Have you ever driven in Toronto?You aren’t Canadian, why do you care?Canada is about to ban rifles from the possession of its subjects, specifically any rifle that looks like a military combat rifle! Why? Because one person misused one!
NEXT UP: Canada to ban TV if someone watches too much.
Canada to ban cars if someone speeds or has a wreck.Canada to ban sex if someone has too many kids.Canada expected to announce ban on assault-style weapons
Canada’s government is set to announce a ban on assault-style weapons following a deadly shooting in Nova Scotia this month that killed 22 people.Officials told The Associated Press …
They park at 95MPH.
You can barely do 30 in Toronto during daylight hours. It's bumper to bumper all day long downtown.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 459
- Replies
- 49
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 92
- Views
- 5K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 46
- Views
- 492
- Replies
- 88
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 61
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8045
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-