Does Ted Cruz Have A Memory Problem?

[IlarMeilyr]

Yup, it was stupid up the butt idea, because that is where the citizens' polls lodged it.

Boehner's right, Ilar is frothing.

Fakey is overdue for his time at Obumbler's anus. He has some serious salad tossing to get to.

Meanwhile, Boehner remains wrong and Fakey remains an utterly unpersuasive liberal Democrat.

And got your ass kicked on the farm bill.

Ilar and the freak right crowd are all crying.

Fakey, being a lolberal Democrat, enjoys when the GOP loses ANYTHING. That fact does not go unnoticed, Fakey.

Meanwhile, he still likes to pretend that there is anybody familiar with his posts who "believes" that he is anything other than a laughable liberal Democratic.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

13. Is Obamacare still at risk of getting repealed or defunded?


Republicans would like to think so, but it’s nearly impossible at this point. The U.S. House of Representatives has voted 42 times to dismantle the law, but hasn’t succeeded once. The Democratic-controlled Senate won’t agree to get rid of the law in its entirety. Most recently, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) performed a sham 21-hour “filibuster” in an effort to force the Senate to agree to defund the health law. But that ultimately won’t work either — the money designated to fund Obamacare’s most important provisions has already been appropriated, and can’t be removed unless the law is totally repealed.




You lose again, you silly *****!

Look at that. Silly ***** Tranny quoted some unacknowledged bleatings of some other stupid asshole, and being the silly ***** it is, Tranny accepts it as the truth.



The fact that he's flatly wrong just makes it more entertaining.

Congress can refuse to fund ANY program, you pathetic hack asshole.

They don't require the permission (or the dead hand) of any PRIOR congress to do so, either.

You are clueless, you silly *****.


The pillars of the law’s health insurance expansion strategy—increased eligibility for Medicaid and the new premium and cost-sharing subsidies for private health insurance—are exempt from the annual appropriations process. These so-called “mandatory” or “entitlement” programs are permanent and have permanent funding authority. Furthermore, the Department of Health and Human Services has the ability to fund related provisions without seeking additional appropriations from Congress. For example, Federal grants to states to plan and build the new health insurance exchanges fall into this category. It also includes funding necessary to immediately lower insurance costs for uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions and early retirees.

One does not need much of a clue to correctly conclude that you lack honesty.

Try to focus you mental pygmy. NO law, no appropriation, NOTHING is beyond the power of Congress to modify or revoke, you turd hole.

If Congress passed some laws that they put in a lock box, by operation of "law," then they ALSO have the power to undo that lock-box law and address whatever the **** was in it. You dishonest hack silly ***** ************.

Have a good night you hapless hopeless hump.

 

[RandomVariable]

Fakey is overdue for his time at Obumbler's anus. He has some serious salad tossing to get to.

Meanwhile, Boehner remains wrong and Fakey remains an utterly unpersuasive liberal Democrat.

And got your ass kicked on the farm bill.

Ilar and the freak right crowd are all crying.

Fakey, being a lolberal Democrat, enjoys when the GOP loses ANYTHING. That fact does not go unnoticed, Fakey.

Meanwhile, he still likes to pretend that there is anybody familiar with his posts who "believes" that he is anything other than a laughable liberal Democratic.

JakeStarkey, the fact that over 80% of the righties on this board have absolutely no idea of what you are saying makes me laugh. Don't mean to be cruel but your party is so far over the edge you are going to suffer for a long, long time to come.

 

[Synthaholic]

I watched it in real time on the floor on C-Span.
You should watch it because it is easy to document.
The Dems refused to bargain with any amount of delay time, doing that, shut down the Government and then they turned around and delayed it anyway.

Because it wasn't their responsibility to negotiate anything.

It is - Constitutionally - the House Republicans responsibility to fund the government.

I'm sorry that you are unable to understand.

You are not the one who understands that the House holds the purse strings and they have the right to not fund some of the bills. In this case one very unpopular bill.

As I have already proven, you are wrong in this case.

 

[Synthaholic]

Look at that. Silly ***** Tranny quoted some unacknowledged bleatings of some other stupid asshole, and being the silly ***** it is, Tranny accepts it as the truth.



The fact that he's flatly wrong just makes it more entertaining.

Congress can refuse to fund ANY program, you pathetic hack asshole.

They don't require the permission (or the dead hand) of any PRIOR congress to do so, either.

You are clueless, you silly *****.


The pillars of the law’s health insurance expansion strategy—increased eligibility for Medicaid and the new premium and cost-sharing subsidies for private health insurance—are exempt from the annual appropriations process. These so-called “mandatory” or “entitlement” programs are permanent and have permanent funding authority. Furthermore, the Department of Health and Human Services has the ability to fund related provisions without seeking additional appropriations from Congress. For example, Federal grants to states to plan and build the new health insurance exchanges fall into this category. It also includes funding necessary to immediately lower insurance costs for uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions and early retirees.

One does not need much of a clue to correctly conclude that you lack honesty.

Try to focus you mental pygmy. NO law, no appropriation, NOTHING is beyond the power of Congress to modify or revoke, you turd hole.

If Congress passed some laws that they put in a lock box, by operation of "law," then they ALSO have the power to undo that lock-box law and address whatever the **** was in it. You dishonest hack silly ***** ************.

Have a good night you hapless hopeless hump.

That's not what you were arguing, you silly *****!

You were arguing that they could defund it. I proved that they cannot.

Sure, they can repeal it again. It would be #43 or so. It's not going anywhere in the Senate and Obama sure isn't going to sign it, so what's the point? It has zero chance of success.


So, once again, I am right and you are wrong.

 

[Synthaholic]

Yeah - Ted Cruz has a "memory" problem:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/337951-more-proof-ted-cruz-is-a-liar.html#post8548295

 

[The Rabbi]

Yeah - Ted Cruz has a "memory" problem:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/337951-more-proof-ted-cruz-is-a-liar.html#post8548295

Actually you're the liar. Doofus.

 

[Sallow]

I watched it in real time on the floor on C-Span.
You should watch it because it is easy to document.
The Dems refused to bargain with any amount of delay time, doing that, shut down the Government and then they turned around and delayed it anyway.

The 'bargaining position' proffered by the Tea Party types was basically capitulate to our demands to scrap Obamacare or we will shut down the government. There was no negotiation about it. The Tea Party types wanted Obamacare on a slab. They knew that the deadlines for implementation were just around the corner. Their keystone piece of legislation was the chloroforming of the ACA. They wanted nothing else. They represent a minority of voters and hold a minority position in the House. But the plan was to put Obamacare in a burlap bag and throw it in the river.

Capitulation ain't negotiation. Shutting down the government was a last resort tactic that blew up in their faces. Now they want to re-write history. We're not that gullible. We are not that blinded by rabid partisanship. We are not the ideological zealots who are roused up by nonsense and blind suspicions and hatreds. Therefore, we're not falling for the ham handed re-writes.

Seems that they are representing the majority of the people who don't want this new ACA.
The majority did not want when it was passed either.

Polls: 77 Percent of Uninsured Don't Want Obamacare, Majority of Voters Want Repeal

NewsMax..

 

[Thatthatisistha]

There are a lot of misconceptions here. To refresh memories and understandings:
- the House alone has the power of the purse, and bills about money / taxes must originate in the House. So funding the government starts in the House.
- HOWEVER The ACA law had its funding built into it. Therefore when the House originally passed the ACA, they passed its funding as well, at that time. It did not need to be re-funded.
- to defund ACA would have required that the law be repealed. It was not subject to the funding bill that the House was voting on.
- Cruz lead the fight to shut down the gov't to force a repeal of ACA. He met with House Republicans in the bar across from Union Station to plan the strategy. The Republican leadership unanimously blame him for the shut down.
- the shut down was a first, historically speaking. We have had other shutdowns, but they've been to negotiate bills that were being considered, or, in the case of Vietnam, to force the president to stop certain military actions.

This shutdown was the first time since 1789 that the House refused to fund the government in order to try to force the President and Senate to repeal an actual existing law.

- The government shut down over the House Republican demands that Obamacare be repealed. The push to only delay the law came later, DURING the shutdown.

 

[peach174]

You are clueless, you silly *****.


The pillars of the law’s health insurance expansion strategy—increased eligibility for Medicaid and the new premium and cost-sharing subsidies for private health insurance—are exempt from the annual appropriations process. These so-called “mandatory” or “entitlement” programs are permanent and have permanent funding authority. Furthermore, the Department of Health and Human Services has the ability to fund related provisions without seeking additional appropriations from Congress. For example, Federal grants to states to plan and build the new health insurance exchanges fall into this category. It also includes funding necessary to immediately lower insurance costs for uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions and early retirees.

One does not need much of a clue to correctly conclude that you lack honesty.

Try to focus you mental pygmy. NO law, no appropriation, NOTHING is beyond the power of Congress to modify or revoke, you turd hole.

If Congress passed some laws that they put in a lock box, by operation of "law," then they ALSO have the power to undo that lock-box law and address whatever the **** was in it. You dishonest hack silly ***** ************.

Have a good night you hapless hopeless hump.

That's not what you were arguing, you silly *****!

You were arguing that they could defund it. I proved that they cannot.

Sure, they can repeal it again. It would be #43 or so. It's not going anywhere in the Senate and Obama sure isn't going to sign it, so what's the point? It has zero chance of success.


So, once again, I am right and you are wrong.

You proved that you don't know anything at all about how the House has control over the purse strings.
You are reading and listening to the lies the left is putting out there.

◾Congress routinely enacts changes to mandatory spending programs as part of its annual appropriations process. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recognizes these changes when analyzing spending bills and scores them as CHiMPS—changes in mandatory program spending.
◾In February 2011, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 1—legislation intended to reduce federal spending by $100 billion, consistent with House Republicans’ “Pledge to America.” CBO found 23 pages’ worth of CHiMPS in the House-passed version of H.R. 1. These reductions in mandatory spending ran the gamut from $26 million in savings over one year, and $74 billion in savings over ten years, achieved by reducing the maximum Pell Grant award (Section 1831), to $30 million in savings achieved by reducing mandatory appropriations to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Section 1517).
◾Congress has already defunded mandatory programs within Obamacare—and done so through appropriations measures. Section 1857 of the continuing resolution Congress enacted in April 2011 (P.L. 112-10) “permanently canceled” $2.2 billion in mandatory funding to Obamacare’s co-op health insurance program.


The House has always used the power of the purse to defund certain parts of any bills.

 

[hangover]

Does Ted Cruz Have A Memory Problem?

No, he just hopes the voters do.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Does Ted Cruz Have A Memory Problem?

No, he just hopes the voters do.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

 

[hangover]

Does Ted Cruz Have A Memory Problem?

No, he just hopes the voters do.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

No surprise, it's ******* TexASS.

 

[Sallow]

Does Ted Cruz Have A Memory Problem?

No, he just hopes the voters do.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

Who knows?

Texas is becoming more "blue".

 

[Redfish]

No, he just hopes the voters do.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

Who knows?

Texas is becoming more "blue".

No its not. Texas will never be a blue state. but take another drag on your roach and continue the dream.

 

[Redfish]

No, he just hopes the voters do.

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

No surprise, it's ******* TexASS.

Yeah, terrible state. Thats why people are leaving the high tax liberal blue states in droves to move to Texas.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

You are clueless, you silly *****.


The pillars of the law’s health insurance expansion strategy—increased eligibility for Medicaid and the new premium and cost-sharing subsidies for private health insurance—are exempt from the annual appropriations process. These so-called “mandatory” or “entitlement” programs are permanent and have permanent funding authority. Furthermore, the Department of Health and Human Services has the ability to fund related provisions without seeking additional appropriations from Congress. For example, Federal grants to states to plan and build the new health insurance exchanges fall into this category. It also includes funding necessary to immediately lower insurance costs for uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions and early retirees.

One does not need much of a clue to correctly conclude that you lack honesty.

Try to focus you mental pygmy. NO law, no appropriation, NOTHING is beyond the power of Congress to modify or revoke, you turd hole.

If Congress passed some laws that they put in a lock box, by operation of "law," then they ALSO have the power to undo that lock-box law and address whatever the **** was in it. You dishonest hack silly ***** ************.

Have a good night you hapless hopeless hump.

That's not what you were arguing, you silly *****!

You were arguing that they could defund it. I proved that they cannot.

You silly dishonest ****, you "proved" no such thing and it is impossible to "prove" your contention because it is flatly false.

You really are a dishonest hack silly useless ****.

The HOUSE can repeal it and IF the Senate gets taken-over by rational Republicans, the Senate could join in, you ******* asshole simpleton lying ***** ****.

Now it is true that Obumbler would stage his last gasp effort to derail it by vetoing the bill. And if there are insufficient votes to over ride his ******* veto, then the repeal would take a bit longer. It would have to await that glorious day (if it comes again) when a scumbag far left wing liberal Democrat is NOT acting as President and is replaced by a moderate to conservative (and most importantly, an intelligent) alternative.

So once again, and as always, you are wrong and I am entirely correct, you silly dishonest ****.

 

[Synthaholic]

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

Who knows?

Texas is becoming more "blue".

No its not. Texas will never be a blue state. but take another drag on your roach and continue the dream.

You're crazy. It's already starting with Wendy Davis.

 

[hangover]

Your ignorance knows no bounds.

His voters support him and he will be a Senator for as long as he wants the job. He's doing exactly what we sent him there to do and part of that was to piss you liberals off. I love it when a plan comes together.

No surprise, it's ******* TexASS.

Yeah, terrible state. Thats why people are leaving the high tax liberal blue states in droves to move to Texas.

The Lone Star State stands virtually alone when it comes to the proportion of an area’s citizens who didn’t finish high school.

Texas ties California for dead last among the 50 states and the District of Columbia in terms of residents 25 or older without high-school educations — 19.3% for both states.

The Lone Star State also places 10th from the bottom in terms of young people attending college, with just 52.8% of 18- to 24-year-olds enrolled in post-secondary schools.

Similarly, a 499 average SAT math score places Texas at a below-average 28th place nationwide, while 36.3% of the state’s high schoolers watch three hours or more of TV daily. That’s the 11th-highest rate nationwide.

Texas “Third-dumbest state in America.”
Guess which state is 3rd ?Dumbest in the Nation??! | Cloaking Inequity

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Texas and California have something very much in common that accounts for the "stats" about the percentage of their populations lacking a high school degree.

Care to guess what that significant thing in common might be?

I'll give you a hint. A good solid clear hint.

It has to do with -- wait for it --

immigration.

Now go sit in the back of the class on that uncomfortable stool, in the corner facing the wall, and put on your dunce cap hungover.