AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,847
- 12,151
- 1,560
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump sexually assaulted at least 27 women, and that doesn't even include the underaged girls he raped on Epstein's island.Clinton raped women, several of them. Believe all women, I think that's your 'moral' code that you're ready to abandon.![]()
Whack Soros and son.Trump sexually assaulted at least 27 women, and that doesn't even include the underaged girls he raped on Epstein's island.
I understand. Pointing out how you abandoned religious beliefs to support a pig embarrasses you. You should be embarrassed.Dude, give it a rest, your broken record has been played one too many times, not to mention it's lame.
WTF....... You talking to me? You got something mixed up.Every leftist communist has to be good at something - I suppose.
That's the entire point of the thread.
Keep preaching hypocrite, no one is listening to your trolling.I understand. Pointing out how you abandoned religious beliefs to support a pig embarrasses you. You should be embarrassed.
Trump sexually assaulted at least 27 women, and that doesn't even include the underaged girls he raped on Epstein's island.
I understand. Pointing out how you abandoned religious beliefs to support a pig embarrasses you. You should be embarrassed.
Cognitive dissonance much??And if a 9 year old article, that describes an election held 49 years ago, doesn't convince you that evangelicals are a major force in 2025 American politics, nothing will.No doubt evangelicals have become a major force in politics. Their rise to power was fueled by groups like the Moral Majority and their insistence that character matters. Jimmy Carter was said to be unfit for the presidency because one of his interviews was published in Playboy magazine. Clinton's affair with an intern was seen as a personal affront to all that is good. With Trump, character doesn't seem to matter. Evangelicals are even proud of his lapses in honesty claiming that God is using a flawed man to do his will. Does character still matter, or does it just not matter for trump?
She talks about character, and yet she was the first to shit on dead kids with the ORANGE MAN BAD card.Dude, give it a rest, your broken record has been played one too many times, not to mention it's lame.
Like I said, with Clinton you set the standard. I would never cheat on my spouse, but you loons made it clear. With Clinton, you don't need morals, so here we are.Maga cult claims high moral standards but supports a lying, cheating, ***** grabbing felon. Some standards you got there, hypocrite.
Did it ever?No doubt evangelicals have become a major force in politics. Their rise to power was fueled by groups like the Moral Majority and their insistence that character matters. Jimmy Carter was said to be unfit for the presidency because one of his interviews was published in Playboy magazine. Clinton's affair with an intern was seen as a personal affront to all that is good. With Trump, character doesn't seem to matter. Evangelicals are even proud of his lapses in honesty claiming that God is using a flawed man to do his will. Does character still matter, or does it just not matter for trump?
No, Jesus is the most important thing. Read revelations in the Bible, and you will see.Got it. **** your deeply held religious beliefs. Politics is more important.
No, but Clinton made adultery cool. You know what sex you are?Did your TACOdaddy commit adultery because of Bill Clinton?
First commandmentTechnically we'd all be Jews if what you say is true.
What if some schools put up teachings of Confucius? Would we all be Buddhists?
Or, what if some non-violent quotes from the Koran were put up, would we all be Muslims?
Putting up simple rules to live by does NOT establish a RELIGION.
Amendment I, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..........". What part of not "prohibiting the free exercise thereof" don't you understand?