Samuel Nixon
Active Member
- May 20, 2015
- 89
- 13
- 31
Nearly two-thirds of voters say U.S. allies losing fight against Islamic State - Washington Times
A lot has been said about isis and it seems we the people of the United States are united with the point on the future of isis.
It is clear that they must be killed (no variants).
To solve the problem we train Iraqis troops to do all the dirty job (doesn't work cause muslims sympathize muslims, even the most radical ones) and at the moment we are not officially involved into a War with isis.
What do you think, should we send our troops to fight isis or should we wait for something?
What is more important - lives of our soldiers or lives of the innocent refusing to negotiate with terrorists?
A lot has been said about isis and it seems we the people of the United States are united with the point on the future of isis.
It is clear that they must be killed (no variants).
To solve the problem we train Iraqis troops to do all the dirty job (doesn't work cause muslims sympathize muslims, even the most radical ones) and at the moment we are not officially involved into a War with isis.
What do you think, should we send our troops to fight isis or should we wait for something?
What is more important - lives of our soldiers or lives of the innocent refusing to negotiate with terrorists?