I couldn't agree more. That's why I always use the word 'marionettes.' These days folks react in the exact way they were manipulated to react. And they don't even realize it. There's a lot more I could say about that, but I better stop. lol. It'll probably get deleted for being off topic.
The intent of the topic is a transparent charade.
As I said, and correctly so, it's presented as a stalking horse by presupposing a concept and then asking the question for the sole intent of selling people on normalizing the concept of ''hate'' crimes in general, again by way of presupposition.
And if/when support for the concept by the drones is realized he's gonna bombard the board with examples of ''hate'' crimes against the Jews because that's what he's truly interested in justifying andpromoting as his content record consistenly illustrates.
It's so amateur and transparent.
But that's how that particular faction has and does operate on herem observably.
It's almost humorous.
He don't give a shit about the girl, I don't think.
And you're not of-topic at all.
The question was raised about ''hate'' crimes.
That whole ''hate' speech gambit has already adopted by your own government as arbitrarily defined by some non-governmental foreign entity and used to try to usurp your 1st Amendment.
For every inch you give the purveyors of such connivery, they will absolutely take a mile, so it is imperitive to head it off at th pass in every instance that it presents itself before it is able to flourish any further among the drones.
If they don't like your thoughts with regard to the social implementation and illusion of legitimacy and justification for the concept of so-called ''hate'' crimes, fukem.
Say it again if they delete it.
That's what I do. Pft...
Don't ever let anyone else control your arguments. Ever...
