- Thread starter
- #121
In the nineteenth century, the Chinese became so addicted to drugs that they were unable to defend themselves against the British. After suffering that humiliation, they decided it had to stop. Their solution was to kill anyone associated with opium: a landowner could be executed for having a single opium plant growing on his land. Opium users were executed anywhere, and anyone with knowledge of opium use who failed to report it was also executed.Yeah I do but the problem will never end until there's no market. The problem is a moral problem and it begins and ends with us
This began before the Communists in the 1800s, continued into the 20th century, and was even enforced by the Communists. The policy completely wiped-out opium use in China. So don’t say it can’t be done—it can be done. It just depends on how badly you want to do it.
I don’t think we have to go to that extreme, but we do need to take strong measures, because what we have been doing is not working. I don’t buy the slippery slope argument. As far as I’m concerned, your constitutional rights end at the border. As long as the government doesn’t blow up civilian aircraft over the United States, I don’t see the problem. And if you’re at war, you’re at war—you don’t read your enemy his rights. If you want to ensure that your constitutional rights are protected, just stay within the United States. This is war. This is something that has to be done if we value our children's future.
