Do you support Trump cheating, as the way to win?

Do you approve of cheating in order for a president to achieve his goals?

  • yes

    Votes: 3 30.0%
  • no

    Votes: 7 70.0%

  • Total voters
    10
First of all, Clinton was accused of rape by 1 woman and accused of sexual misconduct by 3 women, with 2 of them totally dismissed by a court judge. It was never proven that Clinton raped anyone.

On the other hand, Trump has been formally accused of rape by 4 women and one (E. Jean Carrol) did win her lawsuit against Trump. In addition, he was accused of sexual misconduct by 26 women.

So if we are to compare who was a bigger rapist and sex offender, Trump wins the title by a knockout in the first round.

As far as cheating is concerned, the only thing Clinton was accused of cheating on was his wife. Trump has been accused of cheating on every one of his wives (3 of them). In addition, Clinton was never accused of cheating on anything else, on the other hand, Trump has been accused of cheating on just about everything he ever touched.

Another Knockout by Trump in the first round.

This issue was also a knockout in the first round by me over you!

Trump isn't the problem with this country. You're the problem, and I'm glad someone is finally fixing that problem.
 
That's just the gravy.

The meat is a 15% tariff on imports from the EU and a ZERO percent tariff on American exports to the EU.

That's amazing!

Give me that deal from China and India and I swear I'll dance an effin jig.
So you know that Americans pay the 15%.

When and why did you get excited about paying an extra 15% for a foreign product?
 
So you know that Americans pay the 15%.

When and why did you get excited about paying an extra 15% for a foreign product?
To level the playing field for American workers.

You have to agree it's better for the US economy to keep American money in America to be recirculate over and over again. The dollars spent on American products is used to pay American workers, who then spend it in there community, at the diner, at the bowling alley, at the tire shop. And those dollars are spent buying goods made by American workers. The same dollar can circulate a hundred times. But every dollar spent on foreign goods... that dollar is gone... circulating in a foreign economy.
 
AI Overview


The recently announced trade deal between the US and the EU, while avoiding a worst-case scenario of higher tariffs, presents several potential downsides for the United States:

  • Increased Costs for Consumers: The 15% tariff on most EU goods, though lower than initially threatened, will likely lead to higher prices for consumers on a range of products, including cars, furniture, and pharmaceuticals.
  • Potential for Job Losses: Industries that rely on European imports, such as manufacturing and the food and beverage industry (especially wine retailers and restaurants), could face higher costs and reduced profits, potentially leading to job losses.
  • Challenges for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses: Smaller businesses reliant on export markets might struggle more than larger multinational corporations, as they may have a harder time absorbing the increased costs and navigating complex trade regulations.
  • Disruptions to Global Supply Chains: The tariffs could cause disruptions in supply chains, particularly for industries with just-in-time production systems, like the automotive sector.
  • Economic Inefficiency: The protection offered by tariffs could shield less efficient domestic firms from competition, potentially leading to a misallocation of resources and slower overall productivity growth in the long run.
  • Impact on Specific Industries:
    • Automotive: While European carmakers might see a relative advantage compared to US manufacturers facing duties on parts and steel, the new tariffs will still be a burden for European car exporters to the US.
    • Wine and Spirits: The 15% tariffs on EU wine and spirits imports will likely lead to higher prices for consumers and potentially affect the profitability of restaurants and distributors who rely on these products.
  • Uncertainty and Investment Disincentives: The unpredictability surrounding the duration and implementation of these tariffs could discourage European companies from investing in the US, according to Euronews.com.
In essence, while the deal offers some stability compared to a potentially worse outcome, it does come with the cost of higher prices for consumers, potential economic disruptions, and an element of uncertainty for businesses.

Evidently, YOU are willing to pay extra out of your pocket so that Trump gets a fair trade deal, right?
I'm willing to make sacrifices to improve OUR economy and sustain OUR way of life.

60 years ago a single factory income could afford raising a family, buying a new car, buying a house, sending kids through college.

Today a dual income family is living paycheck to paycheck, renting, and making car payments for seven years on a new car.

You tell me, it's the American standard of living on the rise of on the decline?
 
I'm willing to make sacrifices to improve OUR economy and sustain OUR way of life.

60 years ago a single factory income could afford raising a family, buying a new car, buying a house, sending kids through college.

Today a dual income family is living paycheck to paycheck, renting, and making car payments for seven years on a new car.

You tell me, it's the American standard of living on the rise of on the decline?
Do I need to remind you that the population is growing? That is one problem that is at the roto of the decline. That is not going to chance, no matter what Trump does,
 
Do I need to remind you that the population is growing? That is one problem that is at the roto of the decline. That is not going to chance, no matter what Trump does,
1000004967.webp
 
First of all, Clinton was accused of rape by 1 woman and accused of sexual misconduct by 3 women, with 2 of them totally dismissed by a court judge. It was never proven that Clinton raped anyone.

On the other hand, Trump has been formally accused of rape by 4 women and one (E. Jean Carrol) did win her lawsuit against Trump. In addition, he was accused of sexual misconduct by 26 women.

So we believe all women unless the accuse politicians on my team? Is that how it works? LOL>
So if we are to compare who was a bigger rapist and sex offender, Trump wins the title by a knockout in the first round.

As far as cheating is concerned, the only thing Clinton was accused of cheating on was his wife. Trump has been accused of cheating on every one of his wives (3 of them). In addition, Clinton was never accused of cheating on anything else, on the other hand, Trump has been accused of cheating on just about everything he ever touched.

Another Knockout by Trump in the first round.

This issue was also a knockout in the first round by me over you!

Once again and not surprisingly you miss the point.
 
So we believe all women unless the accuse politicians on my team? Is that how it works? LOL>

Did I at any time mention say "I believe all women unless"?

What I said was NOT opinion but facts. By the same token, if both are presidents and both have a reputation of being unfaithful and attacking women, and the benefits of unfairly accusing them is the same, why would there be 4 times more against Trump than against Clinton? Ever consider that?
Once again and not surprisingly you miss the point.

Make your point clear.
 
Did I at any time mention say "I believe all women unless"?
Right you just happen to believe all the women who have accused Trump (not your team) and don't believe any of the women who have accused Clinton (your team). I'm sure it's just a coincidence.... You are a hack. I'd have some modicum of respect for you if you'd just admit it.
What I said was NOT opinion but facts. By the same token, if both are presidents and both have a reputation of being unfaithful and attacking women, and the benefits of unfairly accusing them is the same, why would there be 4 times more against Trump than against Clinton? Ever consider that?


Make your point clear.

The point was clear. Not my fault you're too dumb to see it. Hint: it isn't about the sexual assault/rape of women....
 
Right you just happen to believe all the women who have accused Trump (not your team) and don't believe any of the women who have accused Clinton (your team). I'm sure it's just a coincidence.... You are a hack. I'd have some modicum of respect for you if you'd just admit it.

Did I say that or even suggest it? NO, I did not. I clearly stated facts:

1) Tump was accused of rape 3 times more than Clinton was accused
2) Clinton was accused of sexual molestation 4 times more than Clinton
3) One of Trump' victims won a court case against him.
4) None of Clinton's victims won any case against him

That is fact. There are no suggestions of any case there!!
The point was clear. Not my fault you're too dumb to see it. Hint: it isn't about the sexual assault/rape of women....

Deflection #1
 
To level the playing field for American workers.

You have to agree it's better for the US economy to keep American money in America to be recirculate over and over again. The dollars spent on American products is used to pay American workers, who then spend it in there community, at the diner, at the bowling alley, at the tire shop. And those dollars are spent buying goods made by American workers. The same dollar can circulate a hundred times. But every dollar spent on foreign goods... that dollar is gone... circulating in a foreign economy.
Trump is always bragging about the Billions of Dollars his tariffs are bringing in in increased revenue.
It appears that people are still buying these foreign products all while paying an additional TAX.

You love higher taxes?
Because that is exactly what tariffs are.
A TAX on the American consumer.
 
Trump is always bragging about the Billions of Dollars his tariffs are bringing in in increased revenue.
It appears that people are still buying these foreign products all while paying an additional TAX.

You love higher taxes?
Because that is exactly what tariffs are.
A TAX on the American consumer.
Is it though?

If I buy American products, is there any tariff related increase in prices?

No?

Then it is a penalty for supporting cheap imports that rely on super-cheap labor to undermine American workers. You can still chose to buy imported products, but you will be paying to fund welfare payments to workers in our country who are trying to compete with countries who are paying $1 a day wages.

Do you want a LIVING WAGE???

Well, this is how you get it. Now American businesses can compete with cheap overseas labor.
 
15th post
To level the playing field for American workers.

You have to agree it's better for the US economy to keep American money in America to be recirculate over and over again. The dollars spent on American products is used to pay American workers, who then spend it in there community, at the diner, at the bowling alley, at the tire shop. And those dollars are spent buying goods made by American workers. The same dollar can circulate a hundred times. But every dollar spent on foreign goods... that dollar is gone... circulating in a foreign economy.


That's WHY leftards are against it. Because they know it is good for America.
 
Trump is always bragging about the Billions of Dollars his tariffs are bringing in in increased revenue.
It appears that people are still buying these foreign products all while paying an additional TAX.

You love higher taxes?
Because that is exactly what tariffs are.
A TAX on the American consumer.
In principle I agree that tariffs as a general idea are a bad idea, and that they are just a tax on the consumer. But that can be said of any tax the government puts on a producer of a product assuming that tax is passed on to the consumer. To this point we have not seen evidence that the tariffs have increased prices thus far.
 
Back
Top Bottom