Do You Feel Safe At This Time With Trump At The Helm?

Do you feel safe under Trump's Administration?

  • I'm a conservative and I feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 34 41.5%
  • I'm a conservative and I do not feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 1 1.2%
  • I'm an independent and I feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 14 17.1%
  • I'm an independent and I do not feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 14 17.1%
  • I'm a liberal and I feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 9 11.0%
  • I'm a liberal and I do not feel safe w/Trump

    Votes: 10 12.2%

  • Total voters
    82

IM2

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
38,959
Reaction score
6,448
Points
1,170
Really?

He did disband the pandemic response team and then there is this:
That's a leftist lie. Need the FactCheck article, just ask. I have it right here in my folder.

DumBama and Slow Joe tried to cut funding to the CDC for years while in leadership. Thank goodness the Republicans didn't approve it.
Bullshit. I've read the fact check article. We see the daily briefings. Where is the response team?
 

2aguy

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
79,211
Reaction score
15,968
Points
2,180
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?

I trust Trump....he knows what he is doing vs. the corrupt democrat party members of the press pushing panic, fear and hysteria.....and the democrat party politicians blocking bills to help Americans so they can pass their left wing agenda.....

He stopped Travel to China and you morons called him a racist and a xenophobe.........you are the problem, not Trump.

Trust the Trump.....he will get us through this.
Fool.

Posts the idiot who votes for democrats and other left wing asshats.
 

2aguy

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
79,211
Reaction score
15,968
Points
2,180
He did disband the pandemic response team
That's a debunked lie, pull your head out of your ass.
No it isn't. Pull you head out of yours. For if we had a pandemic response team, they'd be standing with trump and pence daily at the briefings.

Moron, we have a pandemic response team......but the NIH spent 30 billion out of 40 billion not getting ready for the corona virus pandemic......stating they didn't think it would be a problem, back in 2003, so they spent that 30 billion dollars researching monkeys and alcohol....


you doofus.
 

The Original Tree

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
27,666
Reaction score
5,173
Points
290
Location
OHIO
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
Liberals side with China and Russia
Liberals wish death and destruction in America
Liberals steal from the taxpayers to enrich themselves.

Liberals do this kinda shit!

 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
59,022
Reaction score
9,796
Points
2,140
Really?

He did disband the pandemic response team and then there is this:
That's a leftist lie. Need the FactCheck article, just ask. I have it right here in my folder.

DumBama and Slow Joe tried to cut funding to the CDC for years while in leadership. Thank goodness the Republicans didn't approve it.
Bullshit. I've read the fact check article. We see the daily briefings. Where is the response team?
You didn't read anything apparently.

Several Democrats have criticized the Trump administration’s response to the coronavirus outbreak by pointing to the dissolving of a team within the White House’s National Security Council dedicated to coordinating a response to a pandemic. As we’ve written before, in 2018, the administration did eliminate a key position that would have been involved in such a response — the senior director of the NSC’s Office of Global Health Security and Biodefense. But that doesn’t mean the responsibilities of that office were eliminated.

 

Dick Foster

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
5,993
Reaction score
2,269
Points
350
Location
The People's Republic of the Californicated
With Trump this country is in much better hands dealing with a crisis than it would have been with Obummer or heaven forbid Hiterley. He knows how to cut through the crap and get shit done while the other two bozos wouldn't even have tried must less care. Unless of course they could use the situation to screw us for their personal gain.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
21,719
Reaction score
4,517
Points
290
Location
Tejas
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I take issue with your use of the word "liberal" as being an antonym for "conservative" and vice versa. In fact, those labels are wholly irrelevant. Liberal's antonym is "authoritarian."

I am a true liberal. Those claiming to be liberals today are not liberal. They are anything but liberal.


Liberal:


Liberal:



Liberal:



Liberal:



Contrast with the following:

Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



über Authoritarian from Hel, and the underworld:



I blame Rush Limbaugh for perpetuating this misnomer. He didn't start that shit. The Communists did when they were trying to hide their identity and agenda. They started calling themselves progressives shortly after Teddy Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party. See Woodrow Wilson.

Then, the Commies started calling themselves socialists, after FDR (which is really the same thing, as true Communism requires Anarchy and Anarchy is impossible because it is like a fart in the wind---it blows away and becomes something else [statism] in a matter of seconds).

Then, the Commies went back to calling themselves Communists in the 1960s for a brief period, then back to socialists, then liberals in the late 70s and early 80s, then progressives in the 90s to 2000s, now they are calling themselves "democratic socialists" but they are really Communists, who do not understand that Communism (a stateless existence with all property held in common) will almost immediately become Socialism (the state owning/controlling all property) within a matter of minutes because the people will soon decide that they want an organization of the people to manage it all (i.e. government, which makes such a society no longer Communism, but Socialism).

But, I digress. Rush Limbaugh continues to call Leftists and Communists "liberals" when even he knows it is the wrong label.

I am a liberal. Leftists are decidedly and admittedly NOT liberal.


.
 

toobfreak

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
25,335
Reaction score
7,324
Points
290
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
So basically, out of the three categories, Trump scores a THUMBS UP in about 200 (66.6%) out of a possible 300% of the cases! BTW, liberal and conservative are ideological leanings. Independent is a political leaning. But no matter, your polling shows the nation is behind Donald Trump.
 

toobfreak

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
25,335
Reaction score
7,324
Points
290
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I take issue with your use of the word "liberal" as being an antonym for "conservative" and vice versa. In fact, those labels are wholly irrelevant. Liberal's antonym is "authoritarian."

I am a true liberal. Those claiming to be liberals today are not liberal. They are anything but liberal.


Liberal:


Liberal:



Liberal:



Liberal:



Contrast with the following:

Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



über Authoritarian from Hel, and the underworld:



I blame Rush Limbaugh for perpetuating this misnomer. He didn't start that shit. The Communists did when they were trying to hide their identity and agenda. They started calling themselves progressives shortly after Teddy Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party. See Woodrow Wilson.

Then, the Commies started calling themselves socialists, after FDR (which is really the same thing, as true Communism requires Anarchy and Anarchy is impossible because it is like a fart in the wind---it blows away and becomes something else [statism] in a matter of seconds).

Then, the Commies went back to calling themselves Communists in the 1960s for a brief period, then back to socialists, then liberals in the late 70s and early 80s, then progressives in the 90s to 2000s, now they are calling themselves "democratic socialists" but they are really Communists, who do not understand that Communism (a stateless existence with all property held in common) will almost immediately become Socialism (the state owning/controlling all property) within a matter of minutes because the people will soon decide that they want an organization of the people to manage it all (i.e. government, which makes such a society no longer Communism, but Socialism).

But, I digress. Rush Limbaugh continues to call Leftists and Communists "liberals" when even he knows it is the wrong label.

I am a liberal. Leftists are decidedly and admittedly NOT liberal.
BLF, you may wish to read this:
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
21,719
Reaction score
4,517
Points
290
Location
Tejas
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I take issue with your use of the word "liberal" as being an antonym for "conservative" and vice versa. In fact, those labels are wholly irrelevant. Liberal's antonym is "authoritarian."

I am a true liberal. Those claiming to be liberals today are not liberal. They are anything but liberal.


Liberal:


Liberal:



Liberal:



Liberal:



Contrast with the following:

Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



über Authoritarian from Hel, and the underworld:



I blame Rush Limbaugh for perpetuating this misnomer. He didn't start that shit. The Communists did when they were trying to hide their identity and agenda. They started calling themselves progressives shortly after Teddy Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party. See Woodrow Wilson.

Then, the Commies started calling themselves socialists, after FDR (which is really the same thing, as true Communism requires Anarchy and Anarchy is impossible because it is like a fart in the wind---it blows away and becomes something else [statism] in a matter of seconds).

Then, the Commies went back to calling themselves Communists in the 1960s for a brief period, then back to socialists, then liberals in the late 70s and early 80s, then progressives in the 90s to 2000s, now they are calling themselves "democratic socialists" but they are really Communists, who do not understand that Communism (a stateless existence with all property held in common) will almost immediately become Socialism (the state owning/controlling all property) within a matter of minutes because the people will soon decide that they want an organization of the people to manage it all (i.e. government, which makes such a society no longer Communism, but Socialism).

But, I digress. Rush Limbaugh continues to call Leftists and Communists "liberals" when even he knows it is the wrong label.

I am a liberal. Leftists are decidedly and admittedly NOT liberal.
BLF, you may wish to read this:
Yes, they identify as liberals, but liberal, they are not.

That's the point. Those calling themselves "liberal" are not.

.
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
33,138
Reaction score
9,998
Points
1,400
Trump and Pence are handling this perfectly...but I do hope we open up the country again...Sweden is taking a different approach...they are letting the virus move through their nation just like they do with the seasonal flu...nothing closed and no mandates as of yet.....we will see which way is right....
 

toobfreak

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
25,335
Reaction score
7,324
Points
290
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I take issue with your use of the word "liberal" as being an antonym for "conservative" and vice versa. In fact, those labels are wholly irrelevant. Liberal's antonym is "authoritarian."

I am a true liberal. Those claiming to be liberals today are not liberal. They are anything but liberal.


Liberal:


Liberal:



Liberal:



Liberal:



Contrast with the following:

Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



über Authoritarian from Hel, and the underworld:



I blame Rush Limbaugh for perpetuating this misnomer. He didn't start that shit. The Communists did when they were trying to hide their identity and agenda. They started calling themselves progressives shortly after Teddy Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party. See Woodrow Wilson.

Then, the Commies started calling themselves socialists, after FDR (which is really the same thing, as true Communism requires Anarchy and Anarchy is impossible because it is like a fart in the wind---it blows away and becomes something else [statism] in a matter of seconds).

Then, the Commies went back to calling themselves Communists in the 1960s for a brief period, then back to socialists, then liberals in the late 70s and early 80s, then progressives in the 90s to 2000s, now they are calling themselves "democratic socialists" but they are really Communists, who do not understand that Communism (a stateless existence with all property held in common) will almost immediately become Socialism (the state owning/controlling all property) within a matter of minutes because the people will soon decide that they want an organization of the people to manage it all (i.e. government, which makes such a society no longer Communism, but Socialism).

But, I digress. Rush Limbaugh continues to call Leftists and Communists "liberals" when even he knows it is the wrong label.

I am a liberal. Leftists are decidedly and admittedly NOT liberal.
BLF, you may wish to read this:
Yes, they identify as liberals, but liberal, they are not.

That's the point. Those calling themselves "liberal" are not.

.
AGREE.png
My point is that use of the word "Liberal" now has been co-opted. True liberals seem to have disappeared in the modern lexicon and when I call or refer to someone as a liberal here, it is under the current usage rather than the accurate one.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
59,022
Reaction score
9,796
Points
2,140
Trump and Pence are handling this perfectly...but I do hope we open up the country again...Sweden is taking a different approach...they are letting the virus move through their nation just like they do with the seasonal flu...nothing closed and no mandates as of yet.....we will see which way is right....
Certainly a good way to get rid of old and sick people.
 

BluesLegend

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2014
Messages
45,143
Reaction score
9,177
Points
2,410
Location
Trump's Army
He did disband the pandemic response team
That's a debunked lie, pull your head out of your ass.
No it isn't. Pull you head out of yours. For if we had a pandemic response team, they'd be standing with trump and pence daily at the briefings.
It was merged into a broader team for better coordination you idiot. If you want to gripe about something gripe about Obama and Biden who repeatedly tried to cut CDC funding.
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
78,403
Reaction score
14,991
Points
2,220
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I feel safer than a bullet passing through Central Park.
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
78,403
Reaction score
14,991
Points
2,220

Dick Foster

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Messages
5,993
Reaction score
2,269
Points
350
Location
The People's Republic of the Californicated
To those who support him, the reason why there's "panic", to the extent there is, it's due to his constant lies.

The man lies non-stop, and he's not taking this threat seriously, moreover, he doesn't do anything that doesn't benefit him personally. On top of that he only surrounds himself w/yes-men, people who coddle him, have his warped view of reality, and to add icing on the cake, get's RID of those who are actual professionals.

That said, how many of you feel safe under such a person's Administration?
I take issue with your use of the word "liberal" as being an antonym for "conservative" and vice versa. In fact, those labels are wholly irrelevant. Liberal's antonym is "authoritarian."

I am a true liberal. Those claiming to be liberals today are not liberal. They are anything but liberal.


Liberal:


Liberal:



Liberal:



Liberal:



Contrast with the following:

Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



Authoritarian:


Authoritarian:



über Authoritarian from Hel, and the underworld:



I blame Rush Limbaugh for perpetuating this misnomer. He didn't start that shit. The Communists did when they were trying to hide their identity and agenda. They started calling themselves progressives shortly after Teddy Roosevelt formed the Progressive Party. See Woodrow Wilson.

Then, the Commies started calling themselves socialists, after FDR (which is really the same thing, as true Communism requires Anarchy and Anarchy is impossible because it is like a fart in the wind---it blows away and becomes something else [statism] in a matter of seconds).

Then, the Commies went back to calling themselves Communists in the 1960s for a brief period, then back to socialists, then liberals in the late 70s and early 80s, then progressives in the 90s to 2000s, now they are calling themselves "democratic socialists" but they are really Communists, who do not understand that Communism (a stateless existence with all property held in common) will almost immediately become Socialism (the state owning/controlling all property) within a matter of minutes because the people will soon decide that they want an organization of the people to manage it all (i.e. government, which makes such a society no longer Communism, but Socialism).

But, I digress. Rush Limbaugh continues to call Leftists and Communists "liberals" when even he knows it is the wrong label.

I am a liberal. Leftists are decidedly and admittedly NOT liberal.
BLF, you may wish to read this:
Yes, they identify as liberals, but liberal, they are not.

That's the point. Those calling themselves "liberal" are not.

.
View attachment 317584 My point is that use of the word "Liberal" now has been co-opted. True liberals seem to have disappeared in the modern lexicon and when I call or refer to someone as a liberal here, it is under the current usage rather than the accurate one.
It's easy to figure out what a true liberal is from the word itself. The root of liberal has to do with liberty and the assholes calling themself liberal today what nothing to do with liberty but the exact opposite of it. The same goes for the so called progressive today as there's nothing in the least progressive about any of the book burning cretins.
 

candycorn

Alis volat propriis
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
60,954
Reaction score
7,784
Points
1,830
Thailand was asked by the blob for assistance.

The funny thing was that a shipment of medical supplies from the US was just pulling up in Bangkok.

See Politico for details
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top