CDZ Do you consider a country free when 62% of its people are afraid to express an opinion? Simple Yes or NO please.

[Correll]

You would be wrong.

It's not war. You'll understand that if Trump succeeds in getting us into a real war.

You're insane. You're going to be staring at your navel, fretting about your "culture war", when China invades.

1. China is doomed. They are going to crash and burn, regardless of what we do or do not do at this point.


2. I will consider those that call me a nazis, to be out to kill or destroy me and mine. You don't call someone a nazis, because you have a reasonable policy disagreement with them. You call them a nazis, becasue you are working yourself up to killing them.

 

[dblack]

1. China is doomed. They are going to crash and burn, regardless of what we do or do not do at this point.

LOL - miss the point much?

2. I will consider those that call me a nazis, to be out to kill or destroy me and mine. You don't call someone a nazis, because you have a reasonable policy disagreement with them.

Someone calling you names isn't a war. Didn't we all learn that in grade school?

You call them a nazis, becasue you are working yourself up to killing them.

LOL - no. I don't call MAGA Nazi's. But they are fascists, and I will call them out on that. That doesn't mean I'm working myself up to killing them. It means I think they're a dangerous threat to the nation, to freedom and justice. You're all bent. Wake up.

 

[Correll]

LOL - miss the point much?

ALL the outside threats together are less than the internal one from the left.

Someone calling you names isn't a war. Didn't we all learn that in grade school?

LOL - no. I don't call MAGA Nazi's. But they are fascists, and I will call them out on that. That doesn't mean I'm working myself up to killing them. It means I think they're a dangerous threat to the nation, to freedom and justice. You're all bent. Wake up.

So, you deny that you are out to destroy us,

then you admit that you consider us "a dangerous threat to the nation", AND to "freedom and justice".

.... ..... .... you see how that makes me NOT relax? YOu see how that makes it look just like the behavior I described, ie, you are working yourself up to the point, where you pull the trigger, or support someone else doing it.

 

[dblack]

ALL the outside threats together are less than the internal one from the left.

They've convinced you that your own countrymen are your enemies. They've done that so that we'll simply destroy ourselves. They won't have to invade. You're doing their dirty work for them.

Whimper, not a bang.

So, you deny that you are out to destroy us,

Yes. You're paranoid. We discussed that. Get help.

... then you admit that you consider us "a dangerous threat to the nation", AND to "freedom and justice".

Yep. You can't parse that??? NO calls for murder there. No need to destroy anything or anyone. Just trying to get you to come back to the light. Pull your panties back up and join the discussion. Or continue raging and throw your country into the shitter. Your call.

.... ..... .... you see how that makes me NOT relax?

I don't give a single **** if you're relaxed. You're insane. We need to deal with that first.

YOu see how that makes it look just like the behavior I described, ie, you are working yourself up to the point, where you pull the trigger, or support someone else doing it.

Nope. Again, delusional, paranoid, insane.

 

[Correll]

... Pull your panties back up and join the discussion.....

Fine. YOu open to a discussion? With the "dangerous threat to your nation"?

It is our turn. We won the election. Can we implement policy, without RESIST so that the concept of peaceful transfer of power survives?

 

[Hector12]

Very serious intellectual. Not really "on the right" so much as just not pushing the hard left.

Also pushed a lot of self help for young men. Which, oddly attracted a lot of hate from the left.

They eventually drove him from academia and then from his psychology practice.

From what I have heard, his work was very, very helpful to a LOT of people.

He is still doing stuff. And his books are still helping people.

He sounds like an interesting man.

 

[dblack]

Fine. YOu open to a discussion? With the "dangerous threat to your nation"?

Definitely, yeah. Whadya got?

It is our turn. We won the election. Can we implement policy, without RESIST so that the concept of peaceful transfer of power survives?

Nope. RESISTing is our Constitutional right.

The bottom line is that you can't force policy on people when a half (or even a large minority) of the people vehemently oppose the policy. If we can't figure out how to get back to consensus government, we're fucked.

 

[Correll]

He sounds like an interesting man.

Lot of stuff on youtube. Check this out.

 

[dblack]

Lot of stuff on youtube. Check this out.

Brilliant man. He hasn't been quite the same since his inadvertent drug addiction, but still has a really unique perspective. This is how we should approach the "culture war" issues. Rational, open-minded discussion - without government intervention.

 

[Correll]

Brilliant man. He hasn't been quite the same since his inadvertent drug addiction, but still has a really unique perspective. This is how we should approach the "culture war" issues. Rational, open-minded discussion - without government intervention.

You see what his government did to him?

 

[dblack]

You see what his government did to him?

Yep. That was obviously wrong. Exactly the kind of thing your "culture war" produces.

 

[Correll]

Yep. That was obviously wrong. Exactly the kind of thing your "culture war" produces.

Explain how MY SIDE, would do or have done the same to anyone.

 

[Hellbilly]

of course it is.

People can CHOOSE whether or not so say what they want.

Just like Charlie Kirk

 

[dblack]

Explain how MY SIDE, would do or have done the same to anyone.

Sides.

Regardless, Republicans pursue the culture war agenda via laws: Don't Say Gay, banning transgender athletes, political restrictions on what teachers can teach, etc...

And, outside of actual legislation, there's Trump's revenge tour - where he just randomly threatens and bullies companies and groups into doing his bidding. That's more about the fascism than the culture war, but it all dovetails.

 

[Correll]

Don't Say Gay,

You want teachers to be pushing pro-homosexual politics onto gradeschool children?

banning transgender athletes,

No one has a right to play in the other sex's sports. That is not ruining someone's life for political reasons. It is protecting women and women's spaces.

restrictions on what teachers can teach, etc...

Again, preventing the spread of... debunked or political propaganda in curriculums is not the same. Not even close.

And, outside of actual legislation, there's Trump's revenge tour - where he just randomly threatens and bullies companies and groups into doing his bidding.

Give me your best example.

That's more about the fascism than the culture war, but it all dovetails.

No, none of it does. And only an asshole would call us facists.


Especially while YOUR side wanted to send Peterson to an indoctrination center for politicial reasons.

 

[Sparker]

I avoid attaching my name to political opinions because I don't want extra junk mail, spam, and robocalls. When pollsters are at my home, I reflexively tell them to buzz off. But I would be interested if politicians legislate criminal penalties for junk mail.

 

[dblack]

You want teachers to be pushing pro-homosexual politics onto gradeschool children?

I don't want the government involved in educating my children. If they are, it should be controlled locally. Not by central, authoritarian leaders.

No one has a right to play in the other sex's sports.

That's entirely up to the government body of the league or sports association. We don't need the state to govern athletics,.

That is not ruining someone's life for political reasons. It is protecting women and women's spaces.



Again, preventing the spread of... debunked or political propaganda in curriculums is not the same. Not even close.

And, in your fascist wet dream, the state determines what's been debunked at what hasn't, eh?

Give me your best example.

You're not worth my best. Ever. Have some AI:

Google Search

for the obvious.

No, none of it does. And only an asshole would call us facists.

Only a fascist would deny it! --- see how that works? Idiot.

Especially while YOUR side wanted to send Peterson to an indoctrination center for politicial reasons.

Oh boy, your precious ******* "sides" again. That's really the only way you can think, isn't it? You need a "side" to do your thinking for you. Pathetic.

 

[jc456]

But they are fascists,

you don't even know what that means.

 

[dblack]

you don't even know what that means.

Nah... you don't get to play that game. You are a fascist. And it doesn't really matter, to me, whether you admit it. Most fascists won't - it's rightfully disgraced as a political ideology. But it has an enduring appeal, especially among those who are prone to see themselves as victims.

 

[jc456]

Nah... you don't get to play that game. You are a fascist. And it doesn't really matter, to me, whether you admit it. Most fascists won't - it's rightfully disgraced as a political ideology. But it has an enduring appeal, especially among those who are prone to see themselves as victims.

haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahaha, democrats love to throw out words they know nothing about. Shows who the true fascists really are.