Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,905
- 1,530
Asked and answered multiple times in this thread. And the word I used was patterns.And how do electrical and chemical processes in the brain leave imprints on atoms?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Asked and answered multiple times in this thread. And the word I used was patterns.And how do electrical and chemical processes in the brain leave imprints on atoms?
You are here for no other reason to argue against belief God. You are doing it right now. That's not indifference.Quote me.
Stop telling me what you think I said and post what I actually say.
I don;t think it matters if gods exist or not.
This is my position on gods and it has not changed
How is my thought experiment on interconnectedness arguing against gods?You are here for no other reason to argue against belief God. You are doing it right now. That's not indifference.
Again... Laws of physics do not apply to non-material, non-physical things. Your first clue is in the word physics which refers to physical.yes
but first you have to prove that souls exist you haven't done that.
So you have no proof.Again... Laws of physics do not apply to non-material, non-physical things. Your first clue is in the word physics which refers to physical.
It's not. It's all the other arguments you make. Such as your arguing against souls even though you have concocted a ridiculous argument of thought patterns leaving imprints on atoms to act like a soul.How is my thought experiment on interconnectedness arguing against gods?
I have no proof that physics only applies to material, physical processes because no idiot would ever argue they do except for you.So you have no proof.
Just say it.
Actually you haven't answered it at all. You talk about molecular changes (which is a chemical process) but never explain how that leaves an imprint on ATOMS or what that imprint is or how that imprint affects ATOMS.Asked and answered multiple times in this thread. And the word I used was patterns.
So now souls are god?It's not. It's all the other arguments you make. Such as your arguing against souls even though you have concocted a ridiculous argument of thought patterns leaving imprints on atoms to act like a soul.
No. Souls are not God. Souls are spirit.So now souls are god?
And I never once suggested the patterns left on atoms has any of hate properties you claim souls have.
And I already told you that as well.
I never claimed that if we could see a pattern that it would relate directly to a person or a person's thoughts.
All I said what that I think that we leave some sort of pattern on our constituent atoms.
All the rest is shit you made up
And yet i have proof that a person can make unique changes to his own body at the cellular level and most likely below that simply by his thoughts and actions.I have no proof that physics only applies to material, physical processes because no idiot would ever argue they do except for you.
Of course I have you just dismissed it outright.No. Souls are not God. Souls are spirit.
You haven't explained anything about your belief that thought patterns leave imprints on atoms.
And how are those chemical changes manifest?Actually you haven't answered it at all. You talk about molecular changes (which is a chemical process) but never explain how that leaves an imprint on ATOMS or what that imprint is or how that imprint affects ATOMS.
In chemical compounds. Not in altering the structure of atoms.And how are those chemical changes manifest?
Which do not alter the structure of atoms.And yet i have proof that a person can make unique changes to his own body at the cellular level and most likely below that simply by his thoughts and actions.
At least my thought experiment has a beginning based on scientific facts.
Yours doesn't
Nope. I dismissed it because thought patterns do not alter atomic structure.Of course I have you just dismissed it outright.
Atoms are the agents of chemical reactions.In chemical compounds. Not in altering the structure of atoms.
Again I will ask you to quote where i said the structure of atoms was changed?Which do not alter the structure of atoms.
No. Atoms are not agents of chemical reactions.Atoms are the agents of chemical reactions.
And where did I say the structure was altered?
Atoms of the same element are NOT identical.
What are the causes of this FACT?