leftwinger
Diamond Member
Is jughead running again?If a Muslim is elected to public office, do Republicans feel they should be allowed to server or should they be banned?
"Allowed to server"? 340 posts in. Did anyone hammer Dizzy Dean on this yet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is jughead running again?If a Muslim is elected to public office, do Republicans feel they should be allowed to server or should they be banned?
------------------------------------------------------- how can practitioners of the muslim religion that approves of 'islam' approved lying or 'taqiyah' ever be sorted out ?? Best to keep them in muslim lands where they hurt no one but themselves . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Same advice for keeping ALL other third worlders in their he11hole nations and lands DTex ??He was a Shia...Saddam was Sunni. Same old shit. Sort out the human muzzies...kill the rest.like i said , sounds like yer bomber pilot friend was an APOSTATE muslim and other muslims finally dealt with him DTex .
----------------------------------------------------- the problem is that once you let muslims into the USA and they become citizens they then have ALL the RIGHTS and privileges of any other American citizen . The only solution is to stop importing muslims into the USA Gents and Ladies !!Thank you for admitting that you have no respect for the constitution and the traditions that Made America Great long before tRumpI don’t think Muslims should be elected to public office. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
My constitution says I select my candidates on any criteria I find relevant. Are you insane?
"They" ? They who ? Doesn't matter. I don't think any humans are sub-human, but I see Muslims as what they are (based on the Koran), I see LGBT as what they are, based on their abnormal behavior, and I see woman as what they are.Your reality is to think they're sub-human so you can kill them. We liberals are twisted for thinking that they deserve human rights.
Personally, I think christianity and religion is far more twisted and fill in the blanks.
How does that ban them?
------------------------------------- pretty much agree Protectionist , most all American style Christianity is mostly benign . I mean a sodomite is going to continue doing his or her sodomy as much as they like and NO Pastor is ever going to go to the sodomysts house , tie him up and haul him to a tall building to be thrown off of . The most that MIGHT happen will be the Pastor preaching to his congregation against the general topic of 'sodomy' ."They" ? They who ? Doesn't matter. I don't think any humans are sub-human, but I see Muslims as what they are (based on the Koran), I see LGBT as what they are, based on their abnormal behavior, and I see woman as what they are.Your reality is to think they're sub-human so you can kill them. We liberals are twisted for thinking that they deserve human rights.
Personally, I think christianity and religion is far more twisted and fill in the blanks.
As for Christianity, if everyone adhered to its teachings, there wouldn't be a problem in the world.
That's what proves IT MATTERS (big time)History proves that it doesn't matter. Obama was elected twice.
The US itself is not a democracy.Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Afghanistan, Iraq ....Name one Muslim democracy.![]()
Now how did I miss those paradises on Earth?![]()
By far, Muslim extremists.Something to consider.....................
Who is More of a Threat: Far-Right or Muslim Extremists?
How does that ban them?
US Constitution Article 6, Section 2, Part 1 (the Supremacy Clause)
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
The bold print part proclaims supremacy of the Constitution. By definition of the word supremacy, only ONE entity can be supreme (over all else). Thus, this clause bans anything which purports to claim ITSELF to be supreme. Problem with Islam is, it does just that. Supremacy is one of the fundamental tenets of Islam.
--------------------------------------------------------- problem was mostly millenials , gen x , minorities and other aggrieved classes like feminazis , imo !!That's what proves IT MATTERS (big time)History proves that it doesn't matter. Obama was elected twice.
-------------------------------------------- CORRECT , and i don't want MOB Rule / 'democracy' here in the USA Issa .The US itself is not a democracy.Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Pakistan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Afghanistan, Iraq ....Name one Muslim democracy.![]()
Now how did I miss those paradises on Earth?![]()
That would be continent (Europe), not country. You haven't recognized the Islamization of Europe ? ...which have massively undermined their cultures, and/or govtYou are just trying to squirm out of admitting the reality of what I'm saying. Apparently you missed this: Christian Dominionism-The Real Threat to Our Secular Government
As far a looking at other countries, name one that has a tradition of secular government and an establish democracy where the Muslim population has been a threat to - or has undermined-their system of government
Source ? LInk ? Got anything ? You don't get credibility in this forum by telling the other guy to look something up. It's up to YOU to back up your statements, not other posters..I recall a number of these incidents from the last couple of years . If you want to know exact dates look them up. I'm not doing your homework for you. The fact is that in any given time frame, right wing terrorism has been more prevalent
He is respecting the Constitution (Article 6, Section 2, Part 1 - the Supremacy Clause) You are the one who isn't.Thank you for admitting that you have no respect for the constitution and the traditions that Made America Great long before tRump
I refuted itIt is also a red herring fallacy intended to divert attention away from the fact that you can't honestly refute my point
The relevant Clause is Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause) of Article 6, (not Clause 3). And Islam is not a religion. It is the world's longest running ideological con job, masquerading as a religion.Again you prove my point!! No respect for and/or ignorance of the Constitution
The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a clause within Article VI, Clause 3. By its plain terms, no federal office holder or employee can be required to adhere to or accept any particular religion or doctrine as a prerequisite to holding a federal office or a federal government job.
No Religious Test Clause - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Religious_Test_Clause
All Islam is illegal in America,.by US Constitution, Article 6, Section 2, part 1, the Supremacy Clause.I don't think in terms of "should" and "shouldn't but Muslims can't be legally banned unless they are living in America illegally, then YES by all means, ban them. Same with any politician. One must be living here legally to serve. Would I like to see legal Muslims unable to serve? Yes, I would. They are proliferating faster than cockroaches. They and Hispanics will soon be the majority in this country and their radical and progressive agendas will soon be in place. I speak as a conservative, not a Republican but the following appears to be a true statement:
SNIP:
Politically, Republicans are less favorable to Islam than are Democrats; Republicans are more likely to say they are “very concerned” about the rise of Islamic extremism in the world and that “Islam is more likely than other religions to encourage violence among its believers.”
Muslim Population in U.S. to Double by 2050, Study Shows