- Thread starter
- #261
Oh please….stop with the liberal scare tactics.Their argument also opens the door to making contraception illegal again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh please….stop with the liberal scare tactics.Their argument also opens the door to making contraception illegal again.
The IUD is…..doesn’t really prevent conception, just implantation. Still, early hours, and nobody is going to make an issue about it.big difference btwn contraception and murder
big one
(although, that said, some contraceptives are really abortifacients)
I’m not. It is based on the same argument.Oh please….stop with the liberal scare tactics.
I wouldn’t worry about it. Nobody is going to ban birth control. Get real. Thats just a lib Detroit newspaper going with the scare tactics,I’m not. It is based on the same argument.
Michigan GOP AG candidates criticize case that nixed law banning use of birth control
The comments come amid a broader national discussion about cases challenging abortion rights and the right to privacy before the Supreme Court.www.freep.com
The IUD is…..doesn’t really prevent conception, just implantation. Still, early hours, and nobody is going to make an issue about it.
Are you saying both should be entirely unregulated?If a non enumerated right like abortion enjoys nationwide protection (states can't vote to outlaw it), then the right to keep and bear arms(an actual constitutional right), and conceal/open carry should also enjoy nationwide reciprocity, right?
I'm not sure about unregulated, but, I mean, if you are suggesting that states be forced to recognize the right to an abortion nationwide, then states should be forced to recognize conceal carry and open carry rights nationwide. States shouldn't be able to deny one right, but not another, right?Are you saying both should be entirely unregulated?
And that’s what I just said. It should be up to each individual state to decide whether to allow their residents to kill their unborn babies. The Supreme Court can’t force them to ban the practice.
I'm not sure about unregulated, but, I mean, if you are suggesting that states be forced to recognize the right to an abortion nationwide, then states should be forced to recognize conceal carry and open carry rights nationwide. States shouldn't be able to deny one right, but not another, right?
Well, some states allow open/conceal carry, some don't. Some states recognize reciprocity from other states, some don't.I don't think it's quite the same thing. No state is banning concealled carry. Lots of states are banning abortion.
It's more like voting. Every voting right should be available to every voter in every state. Why should polls open late and close early in one state.
Abortion is part of one’s right to one’s own body, it is imo Constitutional. The right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, so no state can outright ban it (or abortion). That doesn’t mean there are no limits that states can impose on either and that would include recognizing reciprocity for example, or restricting abortion after fetal viability.I'm not sure about unregulated, but, I mean, if you are suggesting that states be forced to recognize the right to an abortion nationwide, then states should be forced to recognize conceal carry and open carry rights nationwide. States shouldn't be able to deny one right, but not another, right?
You do want to ban abortion. “Let the states decide” is code for “don’t look, nothing’ here”. You aren’t satisfied with banning it in your state, you are now trying to ban people in your state from going elsewhere to get an abortion.Here's how this goes every time:
Right: We want to oppose Roe V Wade
Left: YOU WANT TO BAN ABORTION
Right: No, we want to ban late abortions and leave it up to the states to decide
Left: YOU'RE ATTACKING WOMEN AND PUTTING THEM INTO SLAVERY
You can't have these discussions with emotionally vomiting leftists.
Not equivalent.Well, some states allow open/conceal carry, some don't. Some states recognize reciprocity from other states, some don't.
The right to keep and BEAR arms, shall not be infringed. So, if all states MUST be forced to allow abortion, then all states MUST be forced to recognize conceal/open carry laws from other states. That's all I'm saying.
Yes, and your reply is "code" for "I want to murder everyone"...You do want to ban abortion. “Let the states decide” is code for “don’t look, nothing’ here”. You aren’t satisfied with banning it in your state, you are now trying to ban people in your state from going elsewhere to get an abortion.
Question: If a fetus could get pregnant, would it be okay to kill the fetus?Abortion is part of one’s right to one’s own body,
Well, some states allow open/conceal carry, some don't. Some states recognize reciprocity from other states, some don't.
The right to keep and BEAR arms, shall not be infringed. So, if all states MUST be forced to allow abortion, then all states MUST be forced to recognize conceal/open carry laws from other states. That's all I'm saying.
Here's how this goes every time:
Right: We want to oppose Roe V Wade
Left: YOU WANT TO BAN ABORTION
Right: No, we want to ban late abortions and leave it up to the states to decide
Left: YOU'RE ATTACKING WOMEN AND PUTTING THEM INTO SLAVERY
You can't have these discussions with emotionally vomiting leftists.
I'm a libertarian, I don't like "moral" laws.The difference is that PERHAPS a handful of states make it illegal. It will still be widely available in the majority of cities where the majority of people live. All the dumb, poor, irresponsible women in Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles, for example, can continue to abort their babies.
If Texas makes it illegal, then the woman or girl who wants an abortion can take a bus to a neighboring state. Planned Parenthood can reallocate all their abortion funds in Texas to an “abortion transportation fund.”