Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In my experience women don't like to see other women bullied, especially by men.
Is this a risk?
Link that she has been nominated and then link that there is a prerequisite for number of years as a judge. Thanks. Stupid Leftist.Age discrimination much? My goodness.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
No, azzhat.
Experience discrimination.
Barrett has only three years experience as a judge.
If you couldn't twist shit, you wouldn't be able to post at all, would you?
Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choiceAll Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.
So you don't like being a fail. Understandable. That won't change until you understand how to post and critically think. Critically thinking we know both parties bully women on the other side. Not going to change.Hmmmm...nice deflection. World would be better off if you were never born. True story.There are several examples above that educate you. Study them on how discuss dems will not alienate females in these hearings.Give me an example. I ll patiently wait. You are one of the reasons I am pro choiceAll Azog had to do was comment on the OP with his trolling, but that is difficult for him. He does not get that con females bully each other, so the OP is silly.Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll? If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
If you deny the above, then you can't read/understand or you are lying.
Hey, you blithering idiot..................Elena Kagan has ZERO.............ZIP...............NADA.............. years experience as a judge.Age discrimination much? My goodness.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
No, azzhat.
Experience discrimination.
Barrett has only three years experience as a judge.
If you couldn't twist shit, you wouldn't be able to post at all, would you?
Link?President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
No , she will be against women rights.
Link to her saying that?President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
One who is hell bent on overturning Roe v Wade?...No.
No risk to Democrats at all.
Where is her quote saying she wants to reverse Roe v Wade? You don't have it. You have leftist Politico spin, Dummy.Ooops....Nope, she wants to reverse Roe v Wade.
That ain't gonna' fly.
White suburban women are not going to take a chance that their daughters and sons could be come mothers and fathers while still in high school or college.
"""A reliable conservative
Religious conservatives would have much to be pleased with Barrett, a devout Catholic.
Barrett has stated that “life begins at conception,” according to a 2013 Notre Dame Magazine article. She also said that justices should not be strictly bound by Supreme Court precedents, a deference known as stare decisis, leaving open the possibility that she could vote to overturn Roe v. Wade if seated on the court.""""
What you need to know about Amy Coney Barrett
The expected nomination of the Seventh Circuit judge sets in motion a likely sharp shift toward a more conservative court.www.politico.com
My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Why is it that the mods allow their fellow cons to troll?
If I wrote something like this I'd have a mod on my ass in 30 minutes.
She's against women's rights.The Dems need to know two very important facts about her.President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett
1. Did she ever wear black face to a Halloween party? And
2. Did she every try to rape this woman?
View attachment 390973
All we need to know about her is in post #63.
She's against women's rights.
This ain't gonna' help Fat Fuck win.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.Truth is always good, and in our cases, I look like a rock star compared to you. Thanks.My pleasure. Truth hurts, eh Jake.View attachment 390971Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never bornNah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
Everyone loves bullying conservative women, even conservative women imo will bully each other.
Barrett is 48 years old.
Used to be, before Clarence Thomas, that judges needed to have a lot more than three fucking years as a judge.
Used to be that a SC post was for judges that had broader, lengthier experience.
RBG was 60 years old when appointed, not a fucking rookie.
Overturning Roe v Wade doesn't outlaw abortion, you raving lunatic.If SCOTUS were ever to overturn RvW, and SoccerMomConservativeInTheValley has her daughter Susie lose a soccer scholarship at Valley State because she can't terminate a pregnancy, the GOP would have less than 20% of its Senate and House member re-elected in the next polls.
I think if the Dims go after Any Barrett hard if will turn off many women who are not hard core Progressives.
President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.
Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.
I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.
Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?
Discuss.
Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.
Schumer should bring in aborted fetuses and shriek that 'Justice Barrett would seek to put an end this!"
Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.
Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.
^^^ what a dumb post looks like.
