Do Dems Risk Alienating Women by Rejecting a Female Supreme Court Nominee?

[LordBrownTrout]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

No, libs will though. They're abhorrent. But you know that Starkey. You're a true conservative.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The ladies must love you, Jake.

I think they just have him pegged.
sometimes three or four times a night, even

Real ladies prefer real virile liberal men to incel cons and Trumpbumplicans, yes.

 

[wamose]

Picking a woman shouldn't be a factor in the Democrats decision but then again, who the hell knows how these loons think. They nominated a Black woman for VP thinking that would bring them female and Black votes so anything is possible. They might even hold it against Barrett that she will be the only qualified woman on the court. But any way you look at it, it definitely shows that Democrats don't think women or Blacks are too bright, by the way they think they're so easy to control. Trump and Trump's pick will be better for our country.

 

[bluzman61]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

 

[bluzman61]

As Trump has nominated Barbara Lagoa, a Hispanic, the left will complain that she isn't black and of course, not their preferred candidate. Trump could pick a black female, wheelchair bound lesbian and they'd still bitch. For them, it's all about completely eliminating the multi-party political system and replacing it with a massive authoritarian Socialist government. One need only research the Nazi 20 point political platform and it screams Socialism.

 

[bluzman61]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

She adopted two black kids from Haiti but they'll still call her a racist.

 

[kaz]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

It won't hurt Democrats, no. The first responsibility of Democrats is self victimization. Democrats women push every gender stereotype on Republican women. Democrats women basically treat women like Archie Bunker does. All for the cause, free government cheese. At any price

 

[bluzman61]

Picking a woman shouldn't be a factor in the Democrats decision but then again, who the hell knows how these loons think. They nominated a Black woman for VP thinking that would bring them female and Black votes so anything is possible. They might even hold it against Barrett that she will be the only qualified woman on the court. But any way you look at it, it definitely shows that Democrats don't think women or Blacks are too bright, by the way they think they're so easy to control. Trump and Trump's pick will be better for our country.

 

[bluzman61]

President Trump has already stated his likely New Supreme Court nominee will be a woman. The odds on favorite is Amy Barrett.

Ms. Barrett is 48 years old. She graduated Magna Cum Laude undergrad and was first in her Law School class. She taught Law and has been an Appellate Court judge (the level below the Supreme Court) since 2017. She is Catholic, married, and has children.

I think it is safe to assume the Dems will do everything in their power to bring her down. If that means destroying her life and career so be it.

Question: Is this a risk for Dems. If they attempt to destroy any female Supreme Court nominee do they risk alienating female voters, particularly suburban white female voters?

Discuss.

It won't hurt Democrats, no. The first responsibility of Democrats is self victimization. Democrats women push every gender stereotype on Republican women. Democrats women basically treat women like Archie Bunker does. All for the cause, free government cheese. At any price

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never born

 

[bluzman61]

Dems have painted themselves into a corner with women. It's going to be very difficult for Dems to attack and oppose a female SCOTUS nominee. Bank on this though, their #1 argument is likely to be abortion.

 

[bluzman61]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

Another case in point why the world would be better if you were never born

 

[bluzman61]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

 

[bluzman61]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

^^^ what a dumb post looks like.

 

[bluzman61]

Nah, not in this case, women will want to see her bullied.

The ladies must love you, Jake.

 

[bluzman61]

Nah, 'queen, a female GOP justice nominee is like a fish out of water to Dems and libs.

No problem saying momma gotta leave the house.

What meds have you stopped taking? I have literally no idea what you just tried to say

 

[bluzman61]

Yep, GOP are fundamentalist character actors to the bone.

 

[Norman]

As Trump has nominated Barbara Lagoa, a Hispanic, the left will complain that she isn't black and of course, not their preferred candidate. Trump could pick a black female, wheelchair bound lesbian and they'd still bitch. For them, it's all about completely eliminating the multi-party political system and replacing it with a massive authoritarian Socialist government. One need only research the Nazi 20 point political platform and it screams Socialism.

Why play the leftist game at all.

Nominate a white man who is unapologetically American. The leftists will moan anyway.

 

[bluzman61]

The ladies must love you, Jake.

I think they just have him pegged.
sometimes three or four times a night, even

Real ladies prefer real virile liberal men to incel cons and Trumpbumplicans, yes.

 

[shockedcanadian]

The question is, if they go forward with a S.C nomination, what do they intend to Impeach Trump for this time, and, how will voters view THAT second attempt to destroy the voters choice as president?