Do Democrats really not see their party has moved way too far to the left?

[AzogtheDefiler]

Musk didn't create Tesla he bought out the creators and slapped his name on it.

With spaceX he bought existing technology and its creator after failing to buy and copy russian rockets.

That’s entirely untrue

So Michael Jordan needs to share his wealth? Why?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Do Democrats really not see their party has moved way too far to the left?​

They are moving along with it, so many of them don't. It's no different than how so many in the Republican Party can't see the way Trump is damaging the GOP and the country as a whole.

Blind tribalism

 

[otto105]

That’s entirely untrue

So Michael Jordan needs to share his wealth? Why?

Hilarious

Google it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hilarious

Google it.

I accept your surrender

 

[otto105]

I accept your surrender

Founding of Tesla​

Tesla, Inc. was founded in July 2003 by engineers Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning in San Carlos, California, inspired by the destruction of GM’s EV1 electric cars and the potential for high-performance, fuel-efficient electric vehicles (EVs) Wikipedia+1. They named the company after inventor Nikola Tesla and initially aimed to develop an electric sports car, the Roadster Wikipedia+1. Eberhard served as CEO and Tarpenning as CFO, while Ian Wright and J.B. Straubel joined as early employees

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Founding of Tesla​

Tesla, Inc. was founded in July 2003 by engineers Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenning in San Carlos, California, inspired by the destruction of GM’s EV1 electric cars and the potential for high-performance, fuel-efficient electric vehicles (EVs) Wikipedia+1. They named the company after inventor Nikola Tesla and initially aimed to develop an electric sports car, the Roadster Wikipedia+1. Eberhard served as CEO and Tarpenning as CFO, while Ian Wright and J.B. Straubel joined as early employees

Aha and who founded McDonalds and then took it to new heights. Musk literally engineered it and marketed it to become a multi billionaire.

You are a moron and you support Nazis


When Elon Musk joined and later led Tesla, Inc., many industry experts believed electric cars would remain niche products. Tesla focused on building desirable, high-performance EVs rather than small economy cars. The early Tesla Roadster showed EVs could be fast and exciting.


2. Product vision and execution


Tesla’s vehicles offered features that stood out:

• Long driving range
• Fast acceleration
• Over-the-air software updates
• Large touchscreen interfaces
• A strong charging network

Many consumers viewed Tesla as a technology company as much as a car company.


3. Building the charging network


Tesla invested heavily in the Tesla Supercharger Network. This helped address “range anxiety,” one of the biggest barriers to EV adoption.


4. Vertical integration


Unlike many automakers that rely heavily on suppliers, Tesla brought much of its battery, software, manufacturing, and charging infrastructure under its own control. This allowed faster innovation but also required enormous capital investment.


5. Aggressive risk-taking


Musk repeatedly pushed the company through periods when failure seemed possible, including the production ramp of the Tesla Model 3. Tesla came close to major financial stress several times but ultimately scaled production.


6. Marketing without traditional advertising


For years Tesla spent little or nothing on conventional advertising. Musk’s public profile and large social media following generated tremendous attention and free publicity.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

We heard the same thing in 2020.

Then Biden got the most votes in the history of anything.

*Biden got more black votes than the first black president in history. Twice!
It’s true! It really really is!

 

[otto105]

Aha and who founded McDonalds and then took it to new heights. Musk literally engineered it and marketed it to become a multi billionaire.

You are a moron and you support Nazis


When Elon Musk joined and later led Tesla, Inc., many industry experts believed electric cars would remain niche products. Tesla focused on building desirable, high-performance EVs rather than small economy cars. The early Tesla Roadster showed EVs could be fast and exciting.


2. Product vision and execution


Tesla’s vehicles offered features that stood out:

• Long driving range
• Fast acceleration
• Over-the-air software updates
• Large touchscreen interfaces
• A strong charging network

Many consumers viewed Tesla as a technology company as much as a car company.


3. Building the charging network


Tesla invested heavily in the Tesla Supercharger Network. This helped address “range anxiety,” one of the biggest barriers to EV adoption.


4. Vertical integration


Unlike many automakers that rely heavily on suppliers, Tesla brought much of its battery, software, manufacturing, and charging infrastructure under its own control. This allowed faster innovation but also required enormous capital investment.


5. Aggressive risk-taking


Musk repeatedly pushed the company through periods when failure seemed possible, including the production ramp of the Tesla Model 3. Tesla came close to major financial stress several times but ultimately scaled production.


6. Marketing without traditional advertising


For years Tesla spent little or nothing on conventional advertising. Musk’s public profile and large social media following generated tremendous attention and free publicity.

Hilarious

 

[Woodznutz]

So you don’t defend the constitution, you ignore it.

I don't defend a weaponized Constitution re birthright citizenship for children of illegals.

 

[Woodznutz]

*Biden got more black votes than the first black president in history. Twice!
It’s true! It really really is!

Maybe because black people have an innate distrust of other black people.

 

[marvin martian]

Self-identified ideology among Democrats: In 1994, 25% of Democrats called themselves liberal (48% moderate). By 2022-2025, this rose to 54-59% liberal, with moderates declining sharply (Gallup and Pew data).


• Voter ideology scores: American National Election Studies (ANES) show Democratic voters’ average self-placement shifted markedly left from 2012-2020 (mean from ~3.3-3.7 toward more liberal scores), widening the partisan gap, with both white and nonwhite Democrats moving left.


• Congressional voting records (DW-Nominate): House Democrats have become more liberal on average since the 1970s (e.g., median shifting from around -0.31 to -0.38 or further), though Republican rightward movement has been steeper in some analyses. Overall polarization has increased with reduced overlap.


• Platform and policy evolution: The 1990s Clinton-era platform emphasized centrism, welfare reform (“end welfare as we know it”), tough-on-crime policies, and market-friendly economics. Later platforms and priorities shifted toward expansive social spending, student debt relief, wealth redistribution emphasis, more progressive taxation, identity-focused equity policies, and cultural liberalism (e.g., stronger stances on abortion, immigration, policing).


• Broader trends: Pew and other analyses note Democrats moving left on social issues and safety net expansion since the 1990s, with rising influence of progressive factions (e.g., Squad, Sanders wing) and declining moderate influence within the party. Public perception and some electoral analyses link this to losses among working-class and moderate voters.

• Transgender participation in women’s sports: Many Democratic leaders and platforms have supported or defended policies allowing biological males to compete in women’s categories, despite declining public support (e.g., Gallup shows Democratic backing for transgender athletes in gender-identity teams dropping from 55% in 2021 to 45% in 2025, with overall U.S. opposition at ~69%). Critics argue this prioritizes ideology over biological fairness and women’s opportunities.


• Patriotism and national symbols: Declining national pride among Democrats (Gallup: only 36% “extremely/very proud” to be American in 2025, down sharply in recent years) and high-profile incidents like NFL anthem protests (often defended by Democratic figures/politicians), reduced emphasis on flag respect in some progressive circles, and platform shifts (e.g., 2024 platform opening with land acknowledgments vs. earlier patriotic framing). Analyses note a patriotism gap hurting the party with moderates.


• “Defund the Police” movement: Prominent support from progressive Democrats and figures (e.g., some Squad members, initial endorsements or praise from officials like Kamala Harris in 2020) during 2020 protests, leading to budget cuts or reallocations in several Democratic-led cities. Though later walked back by many, it contributed to perceptions of reduced support for law enforcement amid rising crime concerns in some areas.


• Emphasis on identity politics and DEI: Greater focus on race/gender equity frameworks (e.g., critical race theory elements in education, expansive DEI mandates in institutions/government), gender ideology in schools/curricula, and group-specific appeals over class/economic populism. Post-election analyses link this to alienation of working-class and male voters.


• Immigration and border policies: Shift toward more permissive stances (e.g., opposition to stricter enforcement, sanctuary policies, resistance to border wall expansions), with progressive wings pushing decriminalization or reduced ICE funding—contrasting earlier bipartisan efforts and contributing to voter backlash on security.

Here's Cory Booker saying he's all in on electing Nazis if it means controlling the Senate.

The DemoKKKrat party is finished.

 

[otto105]

I don't defend a weaponized Constitution re birthright citizenship for children of illegals.

Fuckup hilarious

 

[marvin martian]

Fuckup hilarious

^^^Nazi supporter

 

[otto105]

^^^Nazi supporter

Come on marv.

You love being a national socialist for christofascism.

Wear it like a proud boi.

 

[Meister]

It's hard to say "no" when everything is "free".

Hold on folks, it's an E ticket ride.

 

[marvin martian]

Come on marv.

You love being a national socialist for christofascism.

Wear it like a proud boi.

LOL

Here's who got your votes:

 

[otto105]

LOL

Here's who got your votes:

View attachment 1272068

View attachment 1272069

Hilarious

Are those examples of maga appropriation that angers you?

 

[SeaMajor7]

They are moving along with it, so many of them don't. It's no different than how so many in the Republican Party can't see the way Trump is damaging the GOP and the country as a whole.

Blind tribalism

Oh BULLSHIT.
Screw your what-about-ism.
Go ahead and outline what exactly Trump is damaging for the GOP and THE COUNTRY.
Check your rabid TDS TRIBALISM yourself.
GEE ZUS.

 

[marvin martian]

Hilarious

Are those examples of maga appropriation that angers you?

Those are your people. A klansman and a nazi.

It's who you are now.

Own it.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hilarious

Facts