Diversity, equity and inclusion are American values.

What a dumb remark. Military weapons had advanced well beyond clubs and knives at that time.
.

They weren't using clubs and knives ... But the highest grade weapons available at the time.
Shit ... That was during the same time as Pontiac's War, not the Stone Ages you fucking retard.

Plus ... I really don't care if your stupid ass thinks one type of dead might be worse than any other of type of dead.
I promise you ... The dead children don't give a rat's ass what description you prefer.

Damn you are an ignorant twat ... Just shut the fuck up retard ... :thup:

.
 
Since when?

The only desired 'diversity' is diversity of concept, vision, ideas, possibilities, abilities, talent, aptitude, etc. when that is beneficial. Skin color should be of no more importance than hair color or eye color. Nor should gender or sexual orientation should factor into it at all.

If diversity is the goal, the Kansas City Chiefs should have to let me be their quarterback at least some of the time.

The only equity that makes any sense is equity of opportunity to qualify oneself and compete within reason. The Kansas City Chiefs should not be required to waste their time letting me try out for the team as I am quite obviously incapable of even being an effective water girl, much less the quarterback. But there should be no discrimination between allowing everybody who does qualify to compete for jobs, elected positions, appointments, trophies, etc. Equity of outcome according to Jeffries requires us to reject excellence and quality and to lower standards and expectations to the lowest common denominator and that hurts everybody.

Natural diversity enriches us all and there should be no cultural or legal barriers to that happening. Forced diversity harms people by taking away respect and appreciation for their intellect, qualifications, work ethic, ability, aptitude, intuition etc. and makes of them the token or affirmative action or DEI persons. That is a certain prescription for creating barriers to the pursuit of happiness as well as it tends to again lower standards for excellence and quality.
I think you'd make a fine water girl ;)
 
A most inspiring acceptance speech ........i watched it live with over 100 locals .......one could literally feel the American spirit surge and swell through the crowd........~S~
yeah it was a great speech----ALL the politicians use that ploy.
Best not to be overly impressed with rhetoric
 
youre to used to empty speechs from progressive politicians,,
No----I am aware of empty speeches from any and just about
ALL POLITICIANS (sign me "registered democrat"---remember
JFK? he was good at it too ---as IS DONALD) and as WAS
KAMALA
 
No----I am aware of empty speeches from any and just about
ALL POLITICIANS (sign me "registered democrat"---remember
JFK? he was good at it too ---as IS DONALD) and as WAS
KAMALA
I still dont understand how anyone could call trump a politician when hes a private citizen thats just had enough of the corruption and stepped up,,

more so when hes compared to lifetime politicians,,
 

Diversity, equity and inclusion are American values​


No. They aren’t.

Diversity we already have. It’s not a “value,” it’s just a factual predicate.

Equity is a silly effort to relabel what we do have which is equality. We have long believed in equality of opportunity. We have long denied any right to equality of outcome. We are already a fair-minded people.

And inclusion isn’t a “value,” either. Again, it’s simply a state of being.

When it comes to hiring, we have long embraced merit. As we should.

The Fourteenth Amendment, [Justice Douglas] wrote, “commands the elimination of racial barriers, not their creation in order to satisfy our theory as to how society ought to be organized.”
— quoting the late liberal SCOTUS Justice William O. Douglas. See,
Can Affirmative Action Survive?
Can Affirmative Action Survive?.

Very specifically, Douglas also wrote:

The Equal Protection Clause commands the elimination of racial barriers, not their creation in order to satisfy our theory as to how society ought to be organized. The purpose of the University of Washington cannot be to produce black lawyers for blacks, Polish lawyers for Poles, Jewish lawyers for Jews, Irish lawyers for Irish. It should be to produce good lawyers for Americans, and not to place First Amendment barriers against anyone. [Footnote 2/23] That is the point at the heart of all our


Page 416 U. S. 343


school desegregation cases, from Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U. S. 483, through Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U. S. 1. A segregated admissions process creates suggestions of stigma and caste no less than a segregated classroom, and, in the end, it may produce that result despite its contrary intentions. One other assumption must be clearly disapproved: that blacks or browns cannot make it on their individual merit. That is a stamp of inferiority that a State is not permitted to place on any lawyer.

DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974) (dissent of Justice Douglas at 343 - 344) (emphasis added).​

 
I still dont understand how anyone could call trump a politician when hes a private citizen thats just had enough of the corruption and stepped up,,

more so when hes compared to lifetime politicians,,
Interesting (but that's it---just interesting) comment. Long ago---some greek guy----I think it was Plato said that only RICH PEOPLE
should be politicians because they will not engage in corruption. In fact---the SENATE consisted only of LAND OWNERS (ie rich people) My take on Trump is that he is not the most HONEST
person in the world (nor was JFK) BUT---now he is highly motivated to JUSTIFY HIS EXISTENCE BY --(gasp) --uhm "good
works"
 
.

They weren't using clubs and knives ... But the highest grade weapons available at the time.
Shit ... That was during the same time as Pontiac's War, not the Stone Ages you fucking retard.

Plus ... I really don't care if your stupid ass thinks one type of dead might be worse than any other of type of dead.
I promise you ... The dead children don't give a rat's ass what description you prefer.

Damn you are an ignorant twat ... Just shut the fuck up retard ... :thup:

.
Not according to Archie McCullough, who survived his wounds.
 
Not according to Archie McCullough, who survived his wounds.
.

It's clear I may have misidentified you as stupid and retarded ... You can obviously find and provide us with Wikipedia.

You would like to suggest that the schoolmaster and ten children that perished are somehow less dead ...
Because the Native American savages that slaughtered them didn't gun them down with Uzi's.

That's an example of how you are willing to contort any logic, and abandon all forms of critical thinking ...
Most likely in attempts to promote a somewhat unrelated ignorant political agenda, simply for the sake of argument.
That, most likely, would be a more accurate sign of willful ignorance, than stupidity or retardation.

Look on the bright side ...
You're probably not stupid and you still get to keep your title as an ignorant twat ... :thup:

.
 
“Diversity, equity and inclusion are American values…The motto of the United States of America is e pluribus unum. Out of many, one. That’s diversity. The 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution—one of the most influential important amendments in our country—provides equal protection under the law. That’s equity. In this country, we pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. A flag that we just presented to the new President and Vice President. And in that pledge, we promise, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. A-L-L. That’s inclusion. Not complicated. Diversity, equity and inclusion are American values.”


Leader Jeffries is correct.

So, you're saying the US didn't exist prior to 8 years ago? I find it funny that the "I" stands for inclusion when DEI actually EXCLUDES everyone but who they want to be inclusive with.
 
.

It's clear I may have misidentified you as stupid and retarded ... You can obviously find and provide us with Wikipedia.

You would like to suggest that the schoolmaster and ten children that perished are somehow less dead ...
Because the Native American savages that slaughtered them didn't gun them down with Uzi's.

That's an example of how you are willing to contort any logic, and abandon all forms of critical thinking ...
Most likely in attempts to promote a somewhat unrelated ignorant political agenda, simply for the sake of argument.
That, most likely, would be a more accurate sign of willful ignorance, than stupidity or retardation.

Look on the bright side ...
You're probably not stupid and you still get to keep your title as an ignorant twat ... :thup:

.
Nope. They are still dead.
 
Nope. They are still dead.
.

Of course they are ... And you were the one that wanted to pretend it somehow made a difference.
But thanks for allowing me the opportunity to correct my possible error in judgement ... You ignorant twat ... :auiqs.jpg:

.
 
Back
Top Bottom