DISQUALIFIED! — Congressman Eric Swalwell Names Washington DC Home as ‘Principal Residence’ and Has NO California Address

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The address he gave to Congress was a home where the occupants have lived there nearly 20 years.

Lie.

 

[westwall]

WTF is it with these people. Do they not think people aren't going to check up on them?

Until Trump came along they knew no one ever would.

 

[80zephyr]

Lie.

Do you have any proof?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you have any proof?

That he just lied? Why would I need that?

I don't have to lift a finger to disprove every unsupported lie someone regurgitates.

 

[MarathonMike]

Yes, really show what you're all about.

It definitively shows your programmed Swalwell talking point is something you don't actually care about.

RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!! What a good faithful minion you are. I care plenty about our country's national security, I held security clearances my entire career. Don't tell me what I do or do not care about, faithful minion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

RUSSIAN COLLUSION!!!

Definitely, by Trump's campaign manager who sold confidential.voter data to Russia.

Not that you care.

You don't care about Swalwell and the Chinese spy, either.

These are jist reflexive cult convulsions by you.

 

[80zephyr]

That he just lied? Why would I need that?

I don't have to lift a finger to disprove every unsupported lie someone regurgitates.

If you don't have proof, you cannot call a person a liar, logically. Because you don't know if its a lie or not.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If you don't have proof, you cannot call a person a liar, logically.

I didn't. I called the statement a lie.

The proof is behind the default setting of accepting that he is a resident of California, given he registers to vote in California and represents California in congress, each time having had to prove he is a resident of California.

So yes, I can and should dismiss the unsupported claim as a lie. As should you.

 

[Man With A Plan]

I didn't. I called the statement a lie.

The proof is behind the default setting of accepting that he is a resident of California, given he registers to vote in California and represents California in congress, each time having had to prove he is a resident of California.

So yes, I can and should dismiss the unsupported claim as a lie. As should you.

I hate to point out the painfully obvious here but when someone lies about you and you can refute that lie and make them look foolish...you do it and you do it QUICKLY! As an example? When Jasmine Crockett accused Lee Zeldin of taking donations from Jeffrey Epstein? He immediately informed the world that the man who had contributed to his campaign was ANOTHER Jeffrey Epstein!
So why hasn't Eric Swalwell produced the deed to the home he owns in California and embarrassed those who are claiming he doesn't have a residence in Cali? A common sense person knows the answer to that question.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I hate to point out the painfully obvious here but when someone lies about you and you can refute that lie and make them look foolish...you do it and you do it QUICKLY!

No, I don't. If someone random dummy (or, even dumber, the Gateway Pundit) points at me and says I am not a resident of my state, I don't have to lift a finger to prove to them that I am.

I do , however, have to prove it to the state in which I vote, and to the State in which I win elections to be a Congressperson. As Swalwell has apparently done.

I am missing where anyone but you clowns has to lift a single finger to do anything, here. You're the ones trying to disqualify someone.

Okay then, disqualify him. We're all waiting.

"I can't personally find his California address, therefore he doesn't have one!" isn't going to cut it.

 

[Man With A Plan]

No, I don't. If someone random dummy (or, even dumber, the Gateway Pundit) points at me and says I am not a resident of my state, I don't have to lift a finger to prove to them that I am.

I do , however, have to prove it to the state in which I vote, and to the State in which I win elections to be a Congressperson. As Swalwell has apparently done.

I am missing where anyone but you clowns has to lift a single finger to do anything, here. You're the ones trying to disqualify someone.

Okay then, disqualify him. We're all waiting.

"I can't personally find his California address, therefore he doesn't have one!" isn't going to cut it.

Nobody seems to be able to find his California address. That's the point. In order to be a Congressional Representative you need to live in the State you represent. So where is Swalwell's house? He appears to have been lying about having one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Nobody seems to be able to find his California address.

*Nobody you know, and the Gateway Pundit.. Right, that's what keeping your address private means.

 

[Man With A Plan]

*Nobody you know, and the Gateway Pundit.. Right, that's what keeping your address private means.

When you are required to HAVE an address and you don't...then you hide that fact. When you are required to have an address and you DO...then you provide that address. The whole "privacy" thing is bullshit!

 

[Mack The Finger]

“California Elections Code 349 goes even further. A domicile is defined as “the place in which his or her habitation is fixed” and “the place where a person intends to return and remain.””
His or her? Sooo, California admits there are only two genders? Oopsie…

He IDs with the Cali homeless as one of them.

 

[Doc7505]

He isn't simultaneously claiming two primary residences for any legal purpose.

So I can ignore the irrelevant question.

<~~~~~~>
You're full of crap as always....
Swalwell cannot represent the people of California if is is not a resident of the State.

Eligibility to Serve in the House of Representatives​

General Requirements​

To serve as a member of the House of Representatives, a candidate must meet the following criteria:

• Age: At least 25 years old
• Citizenship: A U.S. citizen for at least seven years
• Residency: Must be an inhabitant of the state they represent at the time of election

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When you are required to HAVE an address and you don't...then you hide that fact.

When you are a congressperson, you keep your address private. For very good reason.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Swalwell cannot represent the people of California if is is not a resident of the State.

But he is, so you fools can stop wasting your time.

 

[Robert W]

DISQUALIFIED! — ​

Congressman Eric Swalwell Names Washington DC Home as ‘Principal Residence’ ​

and Has NO California Address​

DISQUALIFIED! — Congressman Eric Swalwell Names Washington DC Home as ‘Principal Residence’ and Has NO California Address! | The Gateway Pundit | by Joel Gilbert

California Representative Eric Swalwell has faced a barrage of controversy in recent years, from his alleged ties to the Chinese spy “Fang Fang,” to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee over national security concerns, to his infamous on-air mishap during a 2019 interview on...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

12 Nov 2025 ~~ By Joel Gilbert guest contributor

California Representative Eric Swalwell has faced a barrage of controversy in recent years, from his alleged ties to the Chinese spy “Fang Fang,” to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee over national security concerns, to his infamous on-air mishap during a 2019 interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
Now, a new revelation raises even more serious questions about Swalwell’s integrity and eligibility to serve in Congress.
Despite serving as a Congressman from California’s 15th District and claiming Hometown: Livermore on his official House profile, Swalwell has declared his Washington, DC property as his “principal residence.”
A public Deed of Trust for Swalwell’s DC home at 209 S Street NE, dated April 18, 2022, confirms the property is designated as his “principal residence” as a condition of the loan.
The deed includes explicit language making the borrower liable for false or misleading statements regarding occupancy.
“Borrower shall be in default if… Borrower gave materially false, misleading, or inaccurate information or statements to Lender… Material representations include Borrower’s occupancy of the Property as Borrower’s principal residence.”
~Snip~
California Elections Code 349 goes even further. A domicile is defined as “the place in which his or her habitation is fixed” and “the place where a person intends to return and remain.”
If Swalwell’s true domicile is in Washington, DC, the city where he has declared his principal residence, he may no longer meet the basic requirement of being a California “inhabitant.”
Public records searches have not revealed any home ownership or lease under Eric Swalwell’s name in California.
The address most often associated with his background in Livermore, 320 Michell Court, is only a three-bedroom, 1,350 square feet home that belongs to the Mrzywka family who has lived there continuously since 2008, making it highly unlikely that Swalwell resides there today.
~Snip~
Swalwell’s inability to maintain a California home may stem from personal financial mismanagement. His 2025 Financial Disclosure Report paints a bleak picture.
Despite earning $174,000 per year for 13 years in the US Congress, Swalwell has failed to pay down his student loans, remains mired in credit card debt, and has even cashed out his pension.
Trending: John Fetterman Fires Back at Sunny Hostin After She Tries to Shame Him for Voting to Reopen Government Multiple Times
In fact, Swalwell’s debts have remained largely unchanged since his first campaign in 2011.
~Snip~
To this day, Swalwell continues to portray himself as a moral authority, insisting that Trump “cannot defend democratic ideals like the peaceful transfer of power.”
Yet while preaching accountability, Swalwell appears unwilling to meet the most basic standards of his own office, there appears to be a lack of truthfulness and transparency about where he actually lives.
It is time for Eric Swalwell to come clean. As he declared his Washington, DC house as his principal residence, while not disclosing any verifiable domicile in California, he is deceiving both his lenders and his voters.
The law is clear: a member of Congress must remain an inhabitant of the state they represent. By abandoning any genuine California address, Swalwell risks disqualification and betrays the very district that elected him.
The hypocrisy is glaring. The man who once accused others of being “out of touch” has literally moved out of state. If Swalwell cannot demonstrate a legitimate home in California, he should resign immediately, before voters, creditors, and the law force him to do so.


Commentary:
Like NY. AG Letitia James, and Sn. Adam Schiff only Democrats are allowed to lie on Real Estate banking forms as they are above the law...Trump and Trump supporters are not allowed, they go to jail and are fined $$$ billions.
Democrats, "We don't need to follow your stinking laws, we are the law".
Accordingly it seems that Swalwell has not been able to increase his wealth like most Democrats have done. Yet, like Pelosi , Schumer, Sanders nd countless others in Congress, he will retire as a multimillionaire.
Read more:
“California Elections Code 349 goes even further. A domicile is defined as “the place in which his or her habitation is fixed” and “the place where a person intends to return and remain.””
His or her? Sooo, California admits there are only two genders? Oopsie…

Assholes like Swalwell get away with crimes. He used to claim Dublin as his home, maybe 11 miles from Livermore, CA so now his bogus story has caught up to his crimes.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Assholes like Swalwell get away with crimes. He used to claim Dublin as his home, maybe 11 miles from Livermore, CA so now his bogus story has caught up to his crimes.

Nothing has happened at all, save for the Gateway Pundit making up a lie and spoonfeeding it to ignorant MAGAts...that's all.

 

[Man With A Plan]

Nothing has happened at all, save for the Gateway Pundit making up a lie and spoonfeeding it to ignorant MAGAts...that's all.

It's not just the Gateway Pundit that are asking questions about Swalwell's California residence (or lack there of!).