- Dec 16, 2017
- 23,295
- 12,628
- 1,290
Seems like this practice is not uncommon lol.DISQUALIFIED! —
Congressman Eric Swalwell Names Washington DC Home as ‘Principal Residence’
and Has NO California Address12 Nov 2025 ~~ By Joel Gilbert guest contributor
DISQUALIFIED! — Congressman Eric Swalwell Names Washington DC Home as ‘Principal Residence’ and Has NO California Address! | The Gateway Pundit | by Joel Gilbert
California Representative Eric Swalwell has faced a barrage of controversy in recent years, from his alleged ties to the Chinese spy “Fang Fang,” to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee over national security concerns, to his infamous on-air mishap during a 2019 interview on...www.thegatewaypundit.com
California Representative Eric Swalwell has faced a barrage of controversy in recent years, from his alleged ties to the Chinese spy “Fang Fang,” to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee over national security concerns, to his infamous on-air mishap during a 2019 interview on Hardball with Chris Matthews.
Now, a new revelation raises even more serious questions about Swalwell’s integrity and eligibility to serve in Congress.
Despite serving as a Congressman from California’s 15th District and claiming Hometown: Livermore on his official House profile, Swalwell has declared his Washington, DC property as his “principal residence.”
A public Deed of Trust for Swalwell’s DC home at 209 S Street NE, dated April 18, 2022, confirms the property is designated as his “principal residence” as a condition of the loan.
The deed includes explicit language making the borrower liable for false or misleading statements regarding occupancy.
“Borrower shall be in default if… Borrower gave materially false, misleading, or inaccurate information or statements to Lender… Material representations include Borrower’s occupancy of the Property as Borrower’s principal residence.”
~Snip~
California Elections Code 349 goes even further. A domicile is defined as “the place in which his or her habitation is fixed” and “the place where a person intends to return and remain.”
If Swalwell’s true domicile is in Washington, DC, the city where he has declared his principal residence, he may no longer meet the basic requirement of being a California “inhabitant.”
Public records searches have not revealed any home ownership or lease under Eric Swalwell’s name in California.
The address most often associated with his background in Livermore, 320 Michell Court, is only a three-bedroom, 1,350 square feet home that belongs to the Mrzywka family who has lived there continuously since 2008, making it highly unlikely that Swalwell resides there today.
~Snip~
Swalwell’s inability to maintain a California home may stem from personal financial mismanagement. His 2025 Financial Disclosure Report paints a bleak picture.
Despite earning $174,000 per year for 13 years in the US Congress, Swalwell has failed to pay down his student loans, remains mired in credit card debt, and has even cashed out his pension.
Trending: John Fetterman Fires Back at Sunny Hostin After She Tries to Shame Him for Voting to Reopen Government Multiple Times
In fact, Swalwell’s debts have remained largely unchanged since his first campaign in 2011.
~Snip~
To this day, Swalwell continues to portray himself as a moral authority, insisting that Trump “cannot defend democratic ideals like the peaceful transfer of power.”
Yet while preaching accountability, Swalwell appears unwilling to meet the most basic standards of his own office, there appears to be a lack of truthfulness and transparency about where he actually lives.
It is time for Eric Swalwell to come clean. As he declared his Washington, DC house as his principal residence, while not disclosing any verifiable domicile in California, he is deceiving both his lenders and his voters.
The law is clear: a member of Congress must remain an inhabitant of the state they represent. By abandoning any genuine California address, Swalwell risks disqualification and betrays the very district that elected him.
The hypocrisy is glaring. The man who once accused others of being “out of touch” has literally moved out of state. If Swalwell cannot demonstrate a legitimate home in California, he should resign immediately, before voters, creditors, and the law force him to do so.
Commentary:
Like NY. AG Letitia James, and Sn. Adam Schiff only Democrats are allowed to lie on Real Estate banking forms as they are above the law...Trump and Trump supporters are not allowed, they go to jail and are fined $$$ billions.
Democrats, "We don't need to follow your stinking laws, we are the law".
Accordingly it seems that Swalwell has not been able to increase his wealth like most Democrats have done. Yet, like Pelosi , Schumer, Sanders nd countless others in Congress, he will retire as a multimillionaire.
Read more:
“California Elections Code 349 goes even further. A domicile is defined as “the place in which his or her habitation is fixed” and “the place where a person intends to return and remain.””
His or her? Sooo, California admits there are only two genders? Oopsie…
And yes, if you are no longer an inhabitant of the state you represent, you are disqualified from being a member of congress.
Same with AG, letitia james was disqualified from being AG in new york when she filed her primary residence in virginia.
